Previous   Next

The Kansas City Chiefs traded Tony Gonzalez; Is that a bad thing or a good thing?

Asked at Wayne & Larry’s Sports Bar, 933 Iowa on April 25, 2009

Browse the archives

Photo of Richard Rodriguez

“Bad thing for the Chiefs, good thing for Tony because he isn’t going to get a Super Bowl ring with the Chiefs.”

Photo of Nicolas Shump

“I think it’s a bad thing for the Chiefs, but I think it’s a good thing for Tony Gonzalez because he might have a chance to win a Super Bowl.”

Photo of Katie Ezell

“I think it’s a bad thing because he was one of their stronger players … and he’s really hot.”

Photo of Jenny Hepner

“Well, maybe a good thing for him, but a bad thing for the Chiefs because they need to win some games, so they probably should have kept him.”


labmonkey 9 years, 1 month ago

He should have stayed. If he finished his career in KC and decided to move to KC, he would have been a God in KC forever... Len Dawson is gonna die someday and Gonzalez would have been a good replacement for him.

jumpin_catfish 9 years, 1 month ago

When comes to the kc chiefs it's a I don't care thing. Tony should have got out a long time ago.

BigPrune 9 years, 1 month ago

Len Dawson certainly is NOT a people person. He's more like a jerk.

As for Tony Gonzalez, me thinks it's a bad thing for the Chiefs.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.