Do you think the state should require blood tests at the scenes of major accidents?
Asked at Massachusetts Street on February 01, 2008

“No, because it's a violation of the Fourth Amendment to conduct a bodily search without probable cause.”
— Sarah Johnson, criminal defense attorney, Lawrence

“I think a Breathalyzer would be fine, but I don't see any reason to draw blood.”
— Jeremy Hill, freight broker, Shawnee

“If a fatality is involved, I think it would be a good idea to test the driver at fault.”
— Audrianna Kozlowski, Kansas University freshman, Larned

“To me, it seems reasonable to do a blood test for alcohol or drugs that may have affected the driver.”
— Mike Maude, consultant, Lawrence