Previous Next
Do you think Kansas should have private prisons?
Asked at Massachusetts Street on March 26, 2006
“Sure, for the economic development and to relieve some of the pressure on the state.”
“Private for-profit prisons would be less likely to use money for rehabilitation, and rehabilitation is important because 90 percent of the people who are in prison will be out in the next 10 years.”
“Only if they are willing to trade for having publicly owned and managed utilities. See how many of the energy companies won’t quit and open up a prison.”
“I don’t think so. I don’t really know that much about it, but I don’t see what the benefit would be.”
Related story
Top ads RSS
- PSYCHOTHERAPIST Community Mental Health Center Outpatient Serve adults, children and ...
- SIGN ON BONUS! Full time! $400 - $500 per week. ...
- ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE The World Company is a communications and media ...
- CARPENTERS - FT positions available on school project in Baldwin ...
- Wheat State Pizza General Manager or Assistant Managers Must be ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- KU employee suspected of charging personal items on university credit card February 9, 2010 · 18 comments
- ‘Tea party’ is Palin’s people February 7, 2010 · 209 comments
- Kansas Legislature considers poverty waivers for those looking to get married, but unable to pay fees February 9, 2010 · 21 comments
- KDHE orders salvage yard to change practices February 9, 2010 · 7 comments
- The only choice February 9, 2010 · 49 comments
- Blog: Haskell Indian Nations University Get's Another Day Off. February 9, 2010 · 1 comment
- Rep. John Murtha, Iraq war critic, dies at 77 February 9, 2010 · 89 comments
- Proposed constitutional amendment to block federal health care reform considered February 9, 2010 · 28 comments
- Historic KU building to get $1.1 million exterior renovation February 9, 2010 · 8 comments
- Bill would allow big-cat hunting February 9, 2010 · 71 comments
- Bill would allow big-cat hunting February 9, 2010
- Aldrich’s father gets to ‘live a dream’ — in Lawrence February 9, 2010
- Under her wing: Parent writes book on developmental disabilities February 8, 2010
- Chancellor Gray-Little supports schools February 9, 2010
- Eudora man hospitalized after head-on crash into tree February 9, 2010
- Jayhawks knock off Longhorns to get first win in Austin under Bill Self February 9, 2010
- HealthGrades releases list of hospitals with lower mortality, complication rates February 9, 2010
- Climber prepares to peak in Argentina February 8, 2010
- KU communication studies professor is a finalist for MU post February 9, 2010
- KU employee suspected of charging personal items on university credit card February 9, 2010


26 March 2006
at 8:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunflower_sue (Anonymous) says…
OK, I have some questions: “Where does the money come from to run a private prison?”
“If the money comes from the state, isn't it a state prison?”
“How does a prison make money?”
“Will it be a club med prison and the inmate will pay to go there?”
“How does inmate feel about this?”
26 March 2006
at 8:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Jayhawk226 (Anonymous) says…
I thought I was already in a prison….
…>
26 March 2006
at 8:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
pelliott (Anonymous) says…
One of the problems of privitising public services is the state is still responsible for delivery of the services. the theory is the government is so bloated and corrupt through decades of inbreeding combined with the bulky legislative management athority that just hiring an outside party cuts the government red tape cost. Lots of problems, lots of problems. Like with the privatising of roads, the costs rise and the people pay, it is the company that charges instead of a guy who votes in topeka that was elected. The state gets a lesser cut of the moolaa. Another layer to feed. Many of the private efforts in other states have revealed, torture and brutality, coruption of service delivery. I know that many believe that if someone is in the system there is no limit to the amount of abuse and degradation they 'deserve”. I am so ashamed of the abuses, torture and lack of accountability that I would almost say, lets go private, the government seems not to be embarassed by the tyrant attitude of hidden horrors behind stone walls. i wonder if the private companies can be sued and trusted.
26 March 2006
at 9:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
pellioit has it right. Private prisons elsewhere have been a dismal failure. The corporations running these prisons do so only for money, and the prisoners and their families suffer the consequences. Some of you may say they deserve it, but eventually nearly everyone of these folks will be out and rubbing elbows with you and your family, and if they are bitter and ill-prepared for life on the outside, we all pay, and pay dearly.
Another aspect is that private prisons create a vested interest group, and like all businesses, they want growth. How do they grow? By having more prisoners. They'll use their money to buy influence with legislators to ensure a steady supply, regardless of whether that is what is best for those going through the criminal justice system, or society as a whole. It's called the prison-industrial complex.
26 March 2006
at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
Consider that housing prisoners can cost taxpayers approximately $150k per year for males and around $300k for females it might do well to evaluate this idea. Private prisions will hit taxpayers hard in the pocketbooks.
Private corporations over charge taxpayers with some degree of consistentency.
About 50% of prisoners could be non violent. Before spending big bucks on more prisons let's clear out the non violent offenders. It might cost less money to release this segment of the prison population with a one year guranteed training at a VO-Tech plus 6 months rent. Get them on their way with skilled training and a roof over their head. This is treatment and will not cost the $50k-100k to have them remain locked up for another year.
The state would make payment to respective schools and a property manager.
26 March 2006
at 9:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
katybleu (Anonymous) says…
Bozo you are onto something here - If prisons were to go private it would evolve into a prison-industrial-complex and guess what?? I can see our personal freedoms being systemically taken away from us. How else would the PIC get their customers. Then before long people will be inprisoned just for chewing gum in public (just about). NO, the system's not perfect by far, however it should stay the way it is. The government needs to take responsibility for overhauling the prison system. If they'd get their act together and stop being so concerned about image and do some REAL work perhaps this could be accomplished.
26 March 2006
at 9:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
DaREEKKU (Anonymous) says…
It is not the job of you and I to run prisons, it is a function of the state (although I believe our penile system should be reviewed).
26 March 2006
at 9:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
yourworstnightmare (Anonymous) says…
I'm telling you, prison vouchers are the way to go. Each convict would get $100k per year to use at the prison of his/her choice, whether it be public or private.
It's time to break up this big government, spend and spend Department of Corrections monopoly on prisons. Support the “Freedom of Incarceration” measure!
26 March 2006
at 10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
yourworstnightmare (Anonymous) says…
Da,
My penile system is working just fine, thank you. I think you meant penal.
26 March 2006
at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
Money for prisons but not public schools?
Prison vouchers….hmmmmmm what a concept.
26 March 2006
at 10:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
if private prisons are outlawed,
then only outlaws will have private prisons!
***
not a good idea, profit motive which is good in most cases, doesn't work here.
***
kansas needs to develop its own devil's island for the worst most disruptive or violent inmates. hmmmm maybe an island in a river? or perhaps kansas could purchase an unused [unused] island off the coast somewhere.
pref, somewhere where sharks live.
26 March 2006
at 10:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
hey, hannibal,
there's an idea…
crooks check in, but they don't check out!
hey, what's that smell?
26 March 2006
at 10:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
p.s. Hannibal, you could open a “private” prison in your basement, then the state would pay you for this service!
you'd be paid to do what you love, now isn't that the *recipe* for success in any job?
26 March 2006
at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
Say no to private prisons:
davis@house.state.ks.us
26 March 2006
at 11:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
inmate (Anonymous) says…
As much as I'd miss all my friends, I love to be in a family atmosphere. I'd be really good…you wouldn't even have to lock the door….I'd do ironing…sharpen your knives…clean your guns.
26 March 2006
at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
conservativepunker (Anonymous) says…
Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out….
26 March 2006
at 12:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunflower_sue (Anonymous) says…
Maybe I could take in a non-violent prisoner or two to do nothing but my family's never ending laundry. If they ever get finished with that, I've got 3 billion other things that need done that I certainly don't get paid to do.
Hmmmmmmm…….
26 March 2006
at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Multidisciplinary (Anonymous) says…
I read the question and thought..are they sitting at their desks tailoring questions for posters now? Hannibal's brain scan could light Mass. street for the whole holiday season on this one!
26 March 2006
at 4:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
militant (Anonymous) says…
If we let Walmart run the prisons we'd be keeping the jobs in America and paying the same wages that they do in China.
26 March 2006
at 6:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Lorenzo_Teris (Anonymous) says…
Does private prisons mean more or less sexual assaults amongst the inmates?
26 March 2006
at 7:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
dorothyhr (Dorothy Hoyt-Reed) says…
merrill,
Why does it cost twice as much to house females? Kotex don't cost that much!
26 March 2006
at 8:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hitme (Anonymous) says…
batteries
26 March 2006
at 9:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunflower_sue (Anonymous) says…
hitme, good one!
26 March 2006
at 10:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
l_eustacy (Anonymous) says…
Why not have a citizen/deputy program so we can arrest law-breakers and hold them at home while they are awaiting trial. Kansas's answer to the Arizona minutemen.
We'll be checking IDs and treating anyone from Topeka as an illegal alien.
Kansas: As bad as we wanna be
Kansas: nos pessimus
26 March 2006
at 10:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
right on there Hann!
bet jerk jerky tastes really good?
you know, we could also set up cameras at the private prison and make it a 24-hour-pay-per view tv experiencce to raise money. the view would really rake in the bux if it were at hannibal's prison:
criminals check in, but they don't check out!”
***
kansas: SMOKIN!
26 March 2006
at 10:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
xenophonschild (Anonymous) says…
Private prisons are warehouses. Someone mentioned earlier that they cut corners to improve their profit margins, with the result there are few, if any, jobs; limited recreation; limited access to libraries, law and otherwise. Kansas evidently spent a boatload of money a few years ago renting prison space from a private prison in Texas. An acquaintance who was sent to a Texas private prison from a Kansas prison said he, and ninety other Kansas inmates, hated the place, as they were routinely locked in their cells for upwards of 23 hours @ day. They spent all their spare time writing petitions to be returned to Kansas prisons!
26 March 2006
at 10:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Purell (Anonymous) says…
xenophonschild, So it sounds like private prisons promote literacy
26 March 2006
at 10:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
gosh, xenobuns, you mean they actually HATED being in prison? golly that's really terrible…smirk.
actually if the prison experience is worse, maybe fewer will opt for for the prison lifestyle then?
27 March 2006
at 10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
would've been better question than:
who in the he|| is the coach of Missouri…don't know, don't care.
***
no, lawrence shouldn't apologize to topeak! instead, we should start forcing them to install roundabouts between topeak and lawrence, to help slow down and weed out the thug traffic.
27 March 2006
at 10:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bearded_gnome (Anonymous) says…
what a great typo: “topeak!”