Do you think the restaurants that had to close because of the water main break should be compensated?
Asked at Massachusetts Street on January 22, 2005
“Well, I think it's bad luck. Unfortunately it's not a water law issue, so I don't think the city can be held responsible.”
— Burke Griggs, clerk, Lawrence
“They should definitely get some kind of compensation. It's not their fault that it broke, so they should get something.”
— Nesta Wilson, video clerk, rural Lawrence
“Yes. I think that they should probably be compensated for the business that they lost that day.”
— Kerry Glynn, physician, Sabetha
“No. Although the city may be responsible, it is just the cost of doing business. Things happen.”
— Sergio Delgado, attorney, Kansas City, Mo.