Archive for Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Judge tosses lawsuit challenging federal marijuana laws

Iraq war veteran Jose Belen, who takes marijuana to treat post-traumatic stress disorder, poses in front of federal court, Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2018, in New York. Belen is one of five plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging federal marijuana laws. He was set to appear in a New York courtroom for arguments in a lawsuit that claimed classifying marijuana as a dangerous drug is irrational and unconstitutional. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

Iraq war veteran Jose Belen, who takes marijuana to treat post-traumatic stress disorder, poses in front of federal court, Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2018, in New York. Belen is one of five plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging federal marijuana laws. He was set to appear in a New York courtroom for arguments in a lawsuit that claimed classifying marijuana as a dangerous drug is irrational and unconstitutional. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

February 28, 2018

Advertisement

— A judge this week dismissed a lawsuit challenging federal laws criminalizing marijuana as unconstitutional, saying the five plaintiffs had failed to pursue changes in the drug's legal status by first going through the Drug Enforcement Administration.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein did not address the plaintiffs' claim that marijuana has medical benefits, but said Monday that the DEA has the authority to make that decision and not the courts.

The plaintiffs included former NFL player Marvin Washington, the co-founder of a company that sells hemp-based sports products, Army veteran Jose Belen, who said the horrors of the Iraq War left him with post-traumatic stress disorder, and two young children who use marijuana to treat medical conditions.

More health coverage
See more coverage of health-related issues, health care, fitness, and how to live a healthy and active life on the LJWorld Health homepage.

Michael Hiller, lead attorney for the plaintiffs, said they would appeal the decision.

"Resigning the plaintiffs to the petitioning administrative process is tantamount to a death sentence for those patients who need cannabis to live," said Hiller, who had earlier argued that the administrative process takes an average of nine years.

In a statement, Belen called the ruling disappointing, "but just the beginning."

"We are on the right side of history, and we will take this fight to the Supreme Court if necessary," Belen said.

Maurice Evans, left, Blake Hunt, center, and Angel Martinez leave federal court after attending a hearing Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, in New York. The three attended to show their support for a lawsuit that claims the government's decision to classify marijuana as dangerous is irrational, unconstitutional and motivated by politics, not hard science. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

Maurice Evans, left, Blake Hunt, center, and Angel Martinez leave federal court after attending a hearing Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, in New York. The three attended to show their support for a lawsuit that claims the government's decision to classify marijuana as dangerous is irrational, unconstitutional and motivated by politics, not hard science. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

Hellerstein earlier had evinced sympathy for the plaintiffs' claims that medical marijuana had helped them, but appeared to take the government's argument seriously that the plaintiffs should petition the DEA.

The suit originally was filed in July as a growing number of states broke with the federal government and declared marijuana to be legal. Thirty have now legalized it in some fashion, including six for recreational use.

The lawsuit challenged the listing of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, a category that includes heroin and LSD. The federal government says drugs under that classification have no accepted medical use and cannot legally be prescribed.

The plaintiffs had asked the court for a permanent injunction preventing the government from enforcing the Controlled Substances Act as it pertains to cannabis.

Marijuana got its Schedule I designation as part of the ranking or "scheduling" of drugs under the 1970 act.

Government lawyers had argued there were logical reasons to classify marijuana as a dangerous drug under federal law.

A message seeking comment from the U.S. Attorney's office was not immediately returned.

Comments

Aaron McGrogor 1 month, 3 weeks ago

"Government lawyers had argued there were logical reasons to classify marijuana as a dangerous drug under federal law."

Would love to hear some of this BS.

Bob Summers 1 month, 3 weeks ago

Move to pothead paradise Colorado or Washington Jose'.

Steve King 1 month, 3 weeks ago

You can literally hear the sucking sound of more people leaving Kansas than coming. Wonder why that is? Part of that conservative condition perhaps?

Mike Riner 1 month, 3 weeks ago

That's the nice thing about living here.....if you don't like it, you are free to go.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.

loading...