Archive for Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Building jail expansion in phases would take 16 years, $6M to $8M a year, county says

Douglas County Jail

Douglas County Jail

February 20, 2018


Douglas County would have to spend between $6.5 million and $8 million annually for 16 years to build a proposed jail expansion in phases should this spring’s half-cent sales tax referendum fail, County Administrator Craig Weinaug estimates.

Those figures are in a memo Weinaug provided the Douglas County Commission in advance of its Wednesday meeting. Commissioners will meet twice Wednesday, once at 4 p.m. to consider their regular agenda and again at 6 p.m. to receive Weinaug’s report on what will happen if voters choose not to authorize the additional sales tax authority.

The sales tax, if approved, would raise an estimated $9.8 million a year, which would be used for the $44 million jail expansion and the $11 million behavioral health campus. It would also provide $5.1 million a year for new behavioral health programming and $1 million of the $6.1 million needed per year to operate an expanded jail.

Weinaug’s memo explores the annual costs of building the jail in phases. He said the consequences needed to be considered because the County Commission “has been very clear in stating that the jail needs are a legal and moral obligation that the county must provide, even if the voters fail to approve the sales tax initiative on May 15.”

The memo doesn’t make assumptions about how the proposed design would be broken into phases or what parts of the project would be built first.

To expand the jail in phases, Weinaug said the county would have to:

• Annually set aside $4.5 million to $6 million for jail construction.

• Lease temporary incarceration facilities for 50 inmates at a cost of $620,000 annually. It would cost another $905,000 a year to hire the additional correctional officers needed to oversee the temporary cells. Weinaug said the lease cost would increase over time because of inflation and the need to lease more cells.

• Continue to place some inmates out of county at a cost of $400,000 a year. The Douglas County Sheriff’s Office currently spends $1.1 million to house inmates in other counties.

• Set aside $50,000 annually for higher utility bills and another $100,000 for miscellaneous costs.

Inflation would increase the construction cost of the jail expansion if it was done in phases, but that added cost from inflation was about equal to the interest payments on a 20-year bond that would finance the jail’s construction if the referendum were to pass, Weinaug wrote.

The county’s total cost to house inmates would be higher if the jail were constructed in phases because of the lease payments on the temporary cell units and the need for out-of-county placements, Weinaug said.

The county could raise property taxes — without voter approval — to pay for some of the expenses, such as lease payments on temporary cell units, additional operating costs, and the costs associated with housing inmates out of county. However, the county could not increase property taxes — absent approval from voters — to pay for the construction costs related to expanding the jail. When it comes to construction costs, the county would have to keep property tax increases within the state-imposed property tax lid, which generally caps how much of an increase in property tax revenue cities and counties can levy at the rate of inflation unless they get voter approval.

The money set aside for the phased jail construction “would have to be derived from cuts to the non-exempt portions of the county budget,” Weinaug wrote. The memo does not recommend any specific offsetting budget cuts. Weinaug's memo also does not address any ways that the county could generate money to pay for the jail expansion without cutting services.

When pressed by the Journal-World last week, county officials did confirm that the county's existing budget has $4.2 million of property tax money that funds mental health services. Those services would be eligible to be funded by a mental health sales tax, which would effectively free up $4.2 million in property tax money that could be spent on the jail expansion. However, county commissioners would have to decide whether to put another sales tax initiative before voters if the current sales tax proposal is rejected this spring. The current ballot question seeks authorization to spend tax dollars on mental health and jail expansion and to allow the county to issue debt for the jail.

It has been unclear whether county commissioners would support a mental health-only sales tax if the current initiative fails. Instead, commissioners have focused on their desire to see the current sales tax question approved.

Weinaug emphasized that in his latest report too. Expanding the jail in phases would not allow the county to address in a timely manner the needs of inmates with mental illness, the lack of space for female inmates or the decreased effectiveness of the jail’s re-entry program, Weinaug wrote.

"The human cost of failing to meet these needs is not measurable in dollars," Weinaug wrote.

The Douglas County Commission meets Wednesday at the Douglas County Courthouse, 1100 Massachusetts St. To view the commission’s complete agenda, visit

More coverage: Douglas County votes on jail expansion, behavioral health campus
• April 24, 2018 — A look at what is included in the proposed Douglas County Jail expansion

• April 23 — Americans for Prosperity campaigning against sales tax in county referendum

• April 22 — At forum, Douglas County commissioner explains 'what if' option if sales tax referendum fails

• April 22 — Get ready to vote: Questions and answers on the Douglas County half-cent sales tax ballot question

• April 22 — 4,198 days in: Meet the Douglas County Jail’s 5 longest residents

• April 20 — County says Justice Matters using wrong law to try to force mental health vote; group plans to start petition drive on Saturday

• April 18 — Douglas County leaders learn about first participant in diversion program for female inmates; Thellman cites Constitution on jail expansion issue

• April 17 — Average daily population at Douglas County Jail fell slightly in 2017 to reverse 5-year trend

• April 17 — Douglas County counselor: Meeting with Justice Matters about proposed petition would not be appropriate

• April 17 — Despite campaign literature to the contrary, county officials confirm there’s no legal finding that Douglas County Jail must be expanded

• April 16 — Douglas County legal counselor finds proposed Justice Matters petition legally invalid, but group says it can be fixed

• April 16 — What you will see and hear on a Douglas County Jail tour

• April 15 — Speakers at criminal justice, behavioral health forum look beyond jail expansion, crisis center

• April 14 — County-funded training expands number of peer-support specialists to share ‘been there, got better’ message

• April 11 — Criminal justice group’s spokeswoman says expanding Douglas County Jail would contribute to nation’s mass incarceration problem

• April 9 — Douglas County Commission may be forced to put new mental health, tax plan on November ballot

• March 25 — Increasing population at Douglas County jail at odds with national trend

• March 22 — Advocacy group forms to support county referendum on jail expansion, behavioral health initiatives

• March 21 — Douglas County District Court chief judge defends court’s processes, agrees serious felony crime is increasing

• March 12 — County’s pretrial release, home-arrest programs diverting large numbers from jail, but not enough to prevent overcrowding

• March 11 — DA was more likely to grant a diversion in 2017, but number of people seeking them declined

• March 6 — Douglas County Sheriff’s Office offering jail tours, presentations in advance of spring referendum

• March 5 — Online behavioral health care site available free to county residents pending referendum outcome

• March 4 — Felonies, not pot smoking, filling up the Douglas County Jail, new report says

• March 3 — Activist groups kick off their campaign against jail expansion

• March 1 — Town Talk: Here comes the opposition: Four groups join forces to campaign against Douglas County jail expansion

• Feb. 21 — Douglas County will face tough choices on jail expansion if tax referendum fails, official says

• Feb. 20 — Building jail expansion in phases would take 16 years, $6M to $8M a year, county says

• Feb. 19 — Town Talk: Fact checking county commissioners on assertion that big budget cuts will come if voters reject jail/mental health sales tax

• Feb. 17 — Activist leaders blast proposed expansion of Douglas County Jail

• Feb. 12 — As voters consider $44M expansion, report finds some changes could reduce overcrowding at Douglas County Jail

• Feb. 7 — Douglas County Commission to schedule forums on jail and mental health referendum, provide information on what happens if voters reject

• Feb. 4 — Johnson County built a larger jail and now has 300 unused beds; Douglas County can't use them

• Jan. 30 — State law won't allow Douglas County commissioners to campaign for passage of jail, mental health sales tax

• Jan. 24 — Douglas County Commission approves language for ballot question on jail expansion, behavioral health campus

• Jan. 22 — Following the money: Douglas County partners beefing up behavioral health services with funding

• Jan. 17 — Douglas County Commission agrees to put jail expansion, behavioral health campus on same ballot question

• Jan. 16 — Town Talk: Many residents want to vote separately on jail, mental health projects; there's a way, but county unlikely to go there

• Jan. 16 — Douglas County commissioners ready to ask voters to approve jail expansion, behavioral health initiatives

• Jan. 15 — 2014 speedy trial redefinition clogging Douglas County jail, district court

• Jan. 10 — Price tag of behavioral health campus, services estimated at $5.76 million annually

• Jan. 8 — No insurance and hooked on drugs? Chances are, you won't find treatment in Douglas County

• Jan. 5 — Town Talk: A look at how high Lawrence's sales tax rate would be if voters approve increase for jail, mental health

• Jan. 3, 2018 — Due to misunderstanding, county now says jail expansion, mental health projects must be on same sales tax ballot

• Dec. 31, 2017 — Undersheriff says 2016 annual report shows overcrowding threatening jail safety, re-entry programming

• Dec. 18 — Behavioral health campus plan grew from recognition of housing's role in crisis recovery

• Dec. 13 — Services that will be part of behavioral health campus to be introduced next month at LMH

• Dec. 13 — Douglas County commissioners confident of voter buy-in on jail expansion plan

• Nov. 30 — Douglas County commission agrees to move ahead with $44 million jail expansion design

• Nov. 26 — Sheriff's Office exploring modular units as stopgap solution to Douglas County Jail overcrowding

• Nov. 8 — Douglas County Sheriff's Office recommends jail redesign that would more than double number of beds

• Oct. 4 — Jail expansion, crisis center would require public vote on new taxes, officials say

• Sept. 20 — Estimated cost to expand Douglas County Jail jumps by millions of dollars

• July 26 — Douglas County Commission to forward report on future jail population to architects

• July 16 — Double bunking not considered solution for Douglas County Jail overcrowding

• June 26 — Jail, mental health initiatives help drive proposed tax increase in 2018 county budget

• May 14 — Douglas County data showing swelling jail population despite fewer arrests

• April 5, 2017 — Sheriff urges Douglas County Commission to make jail expansion a priority


Benet Magnuson 2 months ago

The proposed jail expansion would cost approximately $44,000,000 (lump sum to build jail) +$16,000,000 (in interest on the debt over twenty years) + $122,000,000 (in additional operating costs) = $182,000,000 over 20 years, or about $9M per year, so it sounds like the phased-in plan would be less expensive.
And better than either of those options - faster, even less expensive, more effective, and more humane - would be investing in data-driven alternatives to incarceration, improved case processing, and crime prevention.

Patrick Wilbur 2 months ago

Wouldn't it have made more sense to provide this analysis before the ballot question was drafted/submitted?

Bob Summers 2 months ago

If the Liberal ones would quit turning out people from their government inculcation centers earmarked for prison and enticing folk from countries that do not assimilate, prison expansion would not be needed.

Ken Lassman 2 months ago

This is actually a very useful article. it poses the important question: how exactly will the problems facing our community be dealt with if we DON'T pass the proposed tax increase? It places the discussion back to the realities in the trenches, which is an essential perspective to take. I think that both sides for a while looked at the big picture, which is an essential thing to do in order to make sure you are going the direction you really want to be going. But whatever the direction we choose, we must be able to get there in the trenches as well and I think that this article helps flesh that out some more.

Hopefully this information will help both officials and the public understand the options more clearly and allow for a continuation of good reporting on this topic.

Deborah Snyder 2 months ago

What I want to emphasize is the inherent fallacy that a general sales tax (especially on food) will provide a steady source of revenue for Douglas County.

Those who commute, or are wealthy enough to travel, will take their spending elsewhere, which leaves the burden of payment on the backs of the working poor, on college students, on the elderly and children to bear.

Did the hard lessons of our state legislature (which, BTW, is lowering the state sales tax) fall on deaf ears here in Douglas County?

Charles L. Bloss, Jr. 2 months ago

It is my understanding that our property taxes would be raised no matter what they do about the jail expansion, or mental health center. A raise in sales taxes is much better. Seniors are being taxed off of the property that they hoped to retire on.

Rich Lorenzo 2 months ago

It seems like the County campaign strategy is fear, fear and more fear. If you vote no, we will cut mental health services and other county services...If you vote no, it will cost more...If you vote no, you will never get your mental health center...if you vote no, we will raise your property taxes anyway...I hope that citizens in our community see through the fear mongering and rise up and vote NO on jail expansion.

Sam Crow 2 months ago

There may be a dirty little secret that is not being told about this tax.

Last November, Johnson County voted on a sales tax for $182 million for a new courthouse and coroner facility. It was marketed as a public safety tax.

It came out during the election that the State of Kansas requires any sales tax levied by the county to be shared among cities. The breakdown is 63 percent of sales tax revenue goes to the county, while 37 percent of the sales tax revenue goes to cities. That of course results in a huge cash windfall for the JOCO cities.

It was little known until the tax opponents discovered it and made the county put the disclosure on the county web site.

Though it may be a state law unique to JOCO, I would doubt it.

Will possibly required revenue sharing from the Douglas County tax give Lawrence such a cash windfall ?

Melinda Henderson 2 months ago

I asked about that. Was told that the entire 0.5% would go to the County.

Sam Crow 2 months ago

When I called around about it, it was like I was speaking Moldavian. Nobody even understood the question.

I might add in JOCO no one knew except the county officials. It was news to state reps and city officials.

Also, there, the money officially goes to the county. It rebates the cities share to them.

Bob Summers 2 months ago

Why are there so many criminals in Larryville?

Commenting has been disabled for this item.