Archive for Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Kansas tax revenues in February beat estimates; shortfall of roughly $281 million still looms for current fiscal year

March 1, 2017, 2:13 p.m. Updated March 1, 2017, 3:09 p.m.


— Gov. Sam Brownback and Kansas lawmakers received some good financial news Wednesday when the Department of Revenue reported tax collections in February came in $36.9 million above official estimates.

It was the third month in a row that tax revenues have met or exceeded official projections, which were drastically lowered in November after several consecutive months of shortfalls. Since then, revenues for the fiscal year have exceeded the new, lower estimates, by about $68.5 million.

Before the official numbers were released to the public, though, Budget Director Shawn Sullivan commented on Twitter that February revenues would have exceeded projections even if those estimates hadn't been lowered in November.

Kansas Revenue Secretary Sam Williams called the report a hopeful sign that the Kansas economy is improving.

“I am pleased to see continuing growth in withholdings and individual income taxes this month,” he said. “Month-to-month sales tax have increased 2.4 percent and is a hopeful sign that Kansans’ income growth means they have more money to spend.”

The report showed the state took in $86 million in individual income taxes in February, up 18 percent from the same month last year. Retail sales tax collections, at $167.6 million, were $3.9 million higher than in February 2016.

Still, even with the extra money in February, lawmakers face a shortfall of roughly $281 million that must be filled in the final four months of the current fiscal year.

The Kansas House has already passed a bill that would fill in that gap without major spending cuts, largely by borrowing more than $300 million in idle monies currently invested through the state pension system.

But Republican leaders in the Senate have been arguing for actual spending cuts this year, including cuts to K-12 education, although so far they’ve been unable to convince the rest of the Senate to go along with that.

Another big question is whether Brownback and his allies in the Legislature will be able to use the report to push back on legislative demands to reverse or scale back many of the tax cuts he championed in 2012. With those tax cuts in place, lawmakers would need to either cut an estimated $755 million in spending over the next two fiscal years, or find an equal amount of money in the form of new revenues or transfers out of other funds, or a combination of both.

Brownback has already offered a plan for avoiding cuts in future years. But it depends on measures most lawmakers oppose, such as sweeping more money out of the state highway fund, selling off the state’s interest in future tobacco settlement payments and imposing big hikes in cigarette and alcohol taxes.

Sen. Tom Holland, D-Baldwin City, the ranking Democrat on the Senate tax committee, said he does not believe one month’s revenues will change the larger debate over long-term tax policy.

“You’re not going to make this up all in one month, regardless of what the number is,” he said.

Last week, Brownback vetoed a bill that would have raised roughly $1 billion over the next two years by repealing the so-called LLC exemption that allows more than 330,000 farmers and business owners to pay no state income taxes on their nonwage business income.

It also would have raised individual tax rates on most Kansans and would have reinstated a third, higher tax bracket on individuals with more than $50,000, or couples filing jointly with more than $100,000 a year in taxable income.

An attempt to override that veto passed narrowly in the House, but fell five votes short of the needed two-thirds majority in the Senate.

Lawmakers will resume the debate over taxes and spending next week when they return to Topeka following their weeklong midsession break.

“Without comprehensive income tax reform, the Legislature will have failed to balance the budget and end the irresponsible practice of using one-time money to pay our bills,” Senate Democratic Leader Anthony Hensley, of Topeka, said. “February’s revenue numbers don’t change this reality. It’s time to do what’s right for the future of Kansas.”


Gary Pomeroy 1 year, 2 months ago

"It was the third month in a row that tax revenues have met or exceeded official projections, which were drastically lowered in November after several consecutive months of shortfalls. Since then, revenues for the fiscal year have exceeded the new, lower estimates, by about $68.5 million." You know, if you lowered the basket form 10 feet to 71/2 feet, I could be an all-American too . . . .

Greg Cooper 1 year, 2 months ago

OK, so the tax "increase" was due to consumer spending, which has bee pent up for years, and individual income tax collections, again, on the individual. What about corporate taxes? What did business contribute to the pot? I only ask because it was made plain that business would boom with the new incentives designed to make Kansas business-friendly.

So far, it looks as if that business boom hasn't equated to money in the state coffers.

Greg Cooper 1 year, 2 months ago

Just found out--corporate tax collections up by (are you ready?) 511% over estimate, at $6.1 million. Wow, this disastrous tax reform did what it was supposed to do, looks like. Left the burden of funding the government on the individual taxpayer/consumer, and left corporations to bask in the glory of tax heaven. Pretty fair, don't you think?

Carol Bowen 1 year, 2 months ago

I'm not understanding the math. If business tax collections are up, how does that burden individual tax payers?

Greg Cooper 1 year, 2 months ago

The point is that corporate collections are at 6 million, from the largest non-private businesses in Kansas, or a miniscule portion (about 16%) of all tax collections, all borne by individual taxpayers and consumers. Tax breaks to corporations are not shared by individuals, and result in even lower tax bills to corporations while the taxpayers foot the bills to help the corporations become wealthier. Fair? I think not.

Carol Bowen 1 year, 2 months ago

$36.9 million est, x 3 more months = "a spit in the bucket".

Dorothy Hoyt-Reed 1 year, 2 months ago

Oh come on consumers. Buy, buy, buy. You don't expect Kansas royalty, like Koch Industries to start paying taxes. Everyone knows that the peons pay money to the royalty, not the other way around. /sarcasm alert/

Commenting has been disabled for this item.