Archive for Sunday, December 17, 2017

How tall is too tall? City contemplating downtown skyline, other big issues

Downtown at “tipping point” of going different direction

Massachusetts Street is illuminated by holiday lights and vehicles on Thursday, Dec. 14, 2017.

Massachusetts Street is illuminated by holiday lights and vehicles on Thursday, Dec. 14, 2017.

December 17, 2017

Advertisement

As new multistory buildings rise up aside the low-slung blocks of Lawrence’s historic downtown, city leaders are looking at adding guidelines that may change the skyline for years to come.

In recent years, New Hampshire Street has become a corridor of high-rise buildings — at least by Lawrence standards — adding hundreds of new apartments and hotel rooms. But now developers and architects are thinking even bigger. The latest proposal for a downtown conference center calls for a 12-story building, which would be a full five stories taller than any other downtown building.

The changes have the City Commission ready to develop a new downtown master plan, which will replace guidelines that have not been updated in 20 years.

Commissioner Matthew Herbert said that turn toward new urbanism — with denser development and taller buildings — has made a new downtown master plan a necessity.

“We are on that tipping point right now of downtown going in a totally different direction than it has in the past,” Herbert said.

How tall?

The next few years of change have already arrived at City Hall in the form of architectural renderings. In the midst of such proposals, city planners said the current downtown plan is lacking.

“It’s old enough as to be out of date for some of the current issues and addressing some of the current needs,” said Scott McCullough, the city’s director of planning and development.

One of the questions many of the new developments have raised is how tall buildings should be.

Currently, McCullough said, there is a gray area as to how high downtown buildings can be. He said the development code has a limit of 90 feet, or about eight stories, in the downtown commercial district, but guidelines also dictate that the height of surrounding buildings should be taken into account.

“That could be a subject of the new plan,” McCullough said. “How much height does Lawrence tolerate in the downtown?”

The tallest buildings downtown are seven floors, with most of the shops along Massachusetts Street only two floors. However, the most recently aired proposal, for the northern entrance to downtown, includes a 12-story condo and apartment building and two seven-story mixed-use buildings along Massachusetts Street.

When asked what he thinks the height limit should be, Herbert did not have a specific number in mind. Rather, he said, as the city strives to create more affordable housing and infill development, he is nervous about setting “arbitrary caps.”

“To some degree, you have to maintain that discretionary freedom to look at projects on a case-by-case basis, because there are going to be some larger projects that have a great community benefit,” Herbert said. He added that his instinct is to make sure a building fits with those that surround it.

Commissioner Lisa Larsen also said adding more density and residents downtown is important for the future. When it comes to height limits, she said there should be guidelines, but those would need to be looked at closely as part of the master plan.

“I think we do need to have some sort of guidelines as to how high we want to go and where we want to do that,” Larsen said. “Because you could possibly have different guidelines depending on where your location is.”

Parking

The city recently commissioned a parking study for the downtown and surrounding neighborhoods, which made specific recommendations about how parking downtown can be improved.

The downtown master plan will also likely touch on parking, specifically whether including parking should be required when a property is redeveloped. Currently, the responsibility of providing parking downtown falls to the city. That policy resulted in one redevelopment, of the Pachamamas building at 800 New Hampshire St., adding about 70 bedrooms and only a handful of on-site parking spots.

In addition to the city providing parking, Herbert said he thinks large residential developments downtown should be required to include parking. He said the Pachamamas redevelopment is an example.

“You’re putting all the parking burden on shop owners and neighbors, and that, to me, is inappropriate,” Herbert said. However, he said he thinks it’s reasonable that less parking be required downtown than in suburban areas.

Larsen said she thinks parking will be a good topic to discuss, especially given the large number of parking lots throughout downtown that are owned by the city.

“They are all just on ground level,” Larsen said. “Is that the best and highest use for that property? I think that’s something that needs to be discussed.”

What’s missing?

When it comes to the future of downtown, Larsen said there needs to be a mix of uses with various types of business and residential options. For residential, she said that includes workforce housing so people who work downtown can also afford to live downtown.

“I think that is something that is probably truly, truly lacking for the downtown,” said Larsen, who noted that some more expensive housing does seem to be meeting a need. “But we also need to look at meeting the needs of the average workers.”

One thing Herbert said he thinks will be crucial to the success of downtown is the business hours of retail shops. Though he admitted the city can’t regulate that, he said successful downtown districts have a variety of stores open into the evening.

Larsen and Herbert both said they think the new plan also needs to better establish what the boundaries of downtown are. Specifically, Herbert said that is important for Ninth Street, which runs through the East Lawrence neighborhood and into the growing Warehouse Arts District.

“I know that there has been some concern from neighbors about if downtown will just keep growing east and where is downtown ever going to end,” Herbert said.

The new plan

The need for a downtown master plan was identified in the City Commission’s strategic plan. McCullough said the plan will set guidelines for downtown that could also prompt new policies and changes to city code

McCullough said the new downtown master plan will cover various topics, including development, open space, transportation, infrastructure and streetscapes. The plan will also cover land use relationships, which McCullough said covers how developments affect adjacent properties, including factors such as shading and traffic flow.

A committee of city staff is currently working on the scope of the plan, and a request for proposals for a consultant will likely go before the commission in January for consideration. Part of the study will include gathering input from the community, which commissioners and city staff have said will be key in developing the plan.

“The downtown master plan is trying to put the community’s voice together with the current commission’s voice and figure out what do we want downtown Lawrence to be like in 20 years,” Herbert said.

Comments

Deborah Snyder 4 months ago

Thank-you, Commissioners Larsen and Herbert, and most especially Mr. McCullough. I may not agree with city officials when it comes to tax "stimulus" provided to (mostly) local developers, but am heartened that The City will guide downtown development, instead of Developers. 😃

Tony Peterson 4 months ago

At one time there there was a code addressing building height downtown that was calculated in stories rather than feet. Can't remember which it was but when a new building was being constructed the height increase was limited to either two stories more than what had previously been on the site or two stories more than the buildings around it. The code was eliminated in the early '90s.

Joe Vaughan 4 months ago

Whether we like it or not, individually, part of the success of a city's Downtown in the 21st Century is based in its skyline and how many "skyscrapers" it has. One need only look at the new high-rise buildings in KCMO's Power & Light District to see the image and perception they give that there is growth and excitement about taller structures. The new 10-story Cyrus Hotel in Downtown Topeka adds to the image that the city's Central Business District really has a future. Thank you1

Bob Smith 4 months ago

I see endless possibilities for hand-wringing and fretting.

Gene Ramp 4 months ago

I agree w/ Joe Vaughan: "skyscrapers"give the perception that there is growth and excitement about taller structures.

Tim Foley 4 months ago

This is one of the nicest pictures I have ever seen of Downtown. I really don't have a problem with building height, provided there is adequate parking and traffic control. It also helps if there are adequate amenities (groceries and pharmacies, etc.) so that residents won't have to drive around to get to them.

Tony Peterson 4 months ago

Parking is the Achilles heel. Can't keep pushing for more density downtown without addressing the parking shortage that already exists. A size 12 foot is never going to fit in a size six shoe no matter how hard you try.

Rae Hudspeth 4 months ago

A 12 story development right at the main entrance from the north of downtown is going to be an eyesore in comparison to the surrounding buildings, even worse than the current New Hampshire street cuts a bulky upward swath between 2 story downtown businesses and single residential homes at the edge of East Lawrence.

You simply cannot compare a comfortable small downtown with the KC Power and Light, which is right in the middle of existing high-rise buildings. I really don't see that the nightlife area has done anything for downtown KC as far as shopping and residences. Is that what anyone really wants for Lawrence? An "exciting" large bar and concert scene, with more out of price range condos that are already complaining about the noise factor of our music scene? You can't have it both ways.

If there is to be more retail, restaurants and service workers to support a bustling downtown, there does need to be affordable housing in that same area. I applaud Ms Larsen for recognizing this, and there needs to be a way to keep from gentrifying the life out of the neighborhoods downtown and near it.

Richard Heckler 4 months ago

A table and notes on the growth of demand for and supply of housing in Lawrence from 1990 through 2016.

The attachment is publicly available at:

            https://www.dropbox.com/s/l3v3b3ibr0cc7n4/Lawrence%20Housing%20Market%20Growth%201990%20to%202017%20notes.pdf?dl=0

Here are some quick answers to the various questions raised:

Does excessive growth affect property taxes?

The aggregate value of property in any economy is a function of demand for the property, not the total supply of the property. Thus, the aggregate value of homes is a function of the amount of income that all of the homeowners in the community devote to housing consumption.

This aggregate value is independent of the number of homes. If we allow the supply of homes to be overbuilt, then the average value per home goes down. As a result, overbuilding actually lowers the per unit value of homes, which lowers the taxes. The problem with lowered value is that it discourages investment in older homes in older neighborhoods.

Is growth just more housing?

If you are a developer, then that is what you want the public to believe, but more housing is not always a good idea. If you care about the community, you want growth in income, growth in wages and growth to a higher standard of living for our citizens.

The problem with developers is that they just want to build more real estate and pin the label “anti-growth” on progressives. We are very pro-growth in jobs and income. From time to time, we need to oppose growth in real estate because it is excessive. The growth of supply should follow (not lead) in close correspondence to the growth in demand. When supply grows faster than demand, it is good to opposed excessive development.

Bedroom community versus independent community

This is really an economic development issue. Factoid: 25% of Lawrence workers work outside of Douglas County; 27% of US workers work out of their county of residence. Thus, Lawrence is neither a bedroom community nor an island. The level of out-of-county commuting is about normal for the US.

Capacity of Existing Infrastructure

The update to Horizon 2020 does address the capacity of infrastructure. The problem is that the update expects the limits of infrastructure to pace development. You can see from my 1990 to 2016 housing analysis that the limits of infrastructure does a very poor job of managing growth.

Is the steering committee still taking comments?

The Committee took comments through many channels for years. The Committee is taking the position that it is time to stop receiving public input and send a draft plan to the Planning Commission, the City Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. I believe that the public will have ample opportunity for further input as these three bodies deliberate on the draft update to Horizon 2020.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.

loading...