Archive for Thursday, August 24, 2017

Lawrence’s $4.4 million LED light installation raises health concerns

Max Wainscott, with the city's public works department, fixes an LED light in the 600 block of Massachusetts Street on Tuesday, July 19, 2016.

Max Wainscott, with the city's public works department, fixes an LED light in the 600 block of Massachusetts Street on Tuesday, July 19, 2016.

August 24, 2017

Advertisement

As light fixtures throughout the city shed their old bulbs for new LED lights, an unseen element of the new glow has some residents concerned.

Some research indicates the color of LED lights the city will be installing, white with unseen blue light, could be unhealthy. Last summer, the American Medical Association advised against the installation of “blue-rich LED streetlights,” and some residents want the city to follow that recommendation.

“There are towns in America where they are tearing out the LED lights they put in to put in lower-color temperature ones,” said Adrian L. Melott, a professor in the department of physics and astronomy at the University of Kansas. “We don’t want to get ourselves into that fix. It’s easier to switch now than to have to tear them out later.”

The city has allocated about $4.4 million for the new LED lighting in various facilities and along some roadways. The LED lights are more energy efficient and long-lasting, and are projected to save the city about $225,000 annually, according to city projections.

While the AMA report notes the cost and energy benefits of LEDs, it warns that some types of LEDs are harmful when used for nighttime lighting. Lights can be a range of color temperatures, and the AMA recommends that communities minimize blue-rich street lights and generally use LEDs no brighter than 3,000 kelvins. The report states that blue-rich light creates glare and suppresses the nighttime release of melatonin, a hormone associated with sleep quality.

The city’s installation does not follow the AMA recommendation, and part of that has to do with the timing of the recommendation. It has been about a year since the release of the recommendation, and Lawrence-Douglas County Sustainability Director Eileen Horn said there is a lot more information about LED color temperatures that needs to be understood.

“Honestly, we didn’t know to ask for less than 3,000 (K) because it wasn’t an issue,” Horn said. “While we were planning this project, this first piece of research was just coming out and our lighting engineers were telling us this is the first organization to make a statement, but there’s going to be more research done.”

All the LEDs the city is installing, including some outdoor lighting, range between 3,500 and 4,500 K, Horn said. Although Westar Energy operates the vast majority of Lawrence streetlights, the city’s installation includes some city-owned street, pedestrian and parking lot lights, as well as outdoor lighting in parks and sport fields. Horn said bright light is necessary in those areas to ensure the safety of people using them. Lights in the approximately 40 city-owned buildings will also be replaced.

The LED lighting installation is one of the largest elements of the city’s $11.3 million project to improve the energy efficiency of all the city’s facilities. Ultimately, the city followed the recommendation of the Lawrence-based general contractors for the project, 360 Energy Engineers.

“That was in the middle to the end of our design process,” said Nick Pedersen, electrical engineer with 360. “So, it didn’t make sense for us to have a knee-jerk reaction and change the color of lights that we were planning to install based on this one release from the AMA, especially since it’s been widely panned by the lighting industry.”

Pedersen said the contractors are already halfway through installing the city’s new LEDs, and though it would be possible to change plans, doing so would be impractical and not the best decision.

“It’s never too late to change course, but there is cost and complexity associated with that,” Pedersen said. “We haven’t finished the installation yet; we could send back the lights we already bought for a charge and buy yellower lights if we needed to, but we don’t believe that that’s the right thing to do in this case.”

Pedersen pointed out that the AMA recommendation doesn’t get into specifics of how much exposure is harmful.

“With any sort of health-related issue the amount of exposure is a very important part of that discussion,” he said. “What their recommendation doesn’t line out is any sort of empirical data on how much exposure is too much or how much exposure creates any effects at all.”

The AMA recommendation is also specific to streetlights, most of which are not owned or operated by the city. The city owns about 20 percent of the outdoor lighting in Lawrence, with the rest owned and operated by Westar. Including traffic lights, Westar owns 3,500 lights while the city owns about 800 street, pedestrian or parking lot lights, according to Bill Musick of the city’s public works department.

For its part, Westar is also replacing old bulbs with LEDs. About half of the streetlights in town have been changed to LED, according to Westar operations director Vince Avila. Avila said, in an email, that Westar elected to install 4,000 K LEDs because that color temperature mimics moonlight and allows people to see true colors.

“Enabling people to identify colors helps with accurate color descriptions of cars and clothing, which can aid law enforcement,” Avila wrote.

Not everyone agrees with the AMA recommendation. The Department of Energy issued a response stating that effects of exposure to blue light at night also apply to light from television, phone and computer screens and depend on the amount of light and duration of exposure.

But some think the AMA’s recommendation needs to be taken seriously. Mark Roeyer, a retired lighting installer who mostly worked on museum installations, said he would follow the AMA recommendation. He said such recommendations aren’t made casually.

“I support the installation of LEDs, it’s just getting the right ones,” Roeyer said. “The best thing we can do is look at the AMA's report and go with that.”

The AMA recommendation also notes that blue-rich light can negatively affect nocturnal animals and create glare and sky glow. The recommendation states that lights should be shielded in such a way that the light is directed downward. Horn said that has been a concern for many people and that the city will be properly shielding all fixtures.

“If they reflect up toward the sky or out toward your eyes from the fixture then they feel harsher and they can create sky glow or glare,” Horn said. “The best thing you can do to mitigate that on any light fixture, no matter what the technology is, is with proper shielding to make sure that the light is directional."

Horn said the city will be scheduling a community meeting in coming weeks to further discuss the LED light installation.

Comments

Scott McMahan 3 months, 3 weeks ago

The AMA recommendations are not accurate. Here is an explanation from the lighting industry association.

http://www.solidstatelightingdesign.com/not-blue-light/

It boils down to the fact that not all blue light is the same.

Ken Lassman 3 months, 3 weeks ago

Interesting link to a guest editorial, but while it critiqued the AMA study as looking at the wrong criteria (CCT/temperature/K value) instead of biologically relevant criteria (melanopic content), and saying that there are now relatively easy ways to measure this now, it stopped short of providing actually useful information about how the 4500K and 3000K lights compare using the biologically relevant criteria/melanopic content. Too bad--and the link to more information on the topic was a bogus link, at least it didn't work for me.

Scott, if you have more information that actually addresses the relevant difference between these lights, this would be a great time to provide it. I for one am all ears (or should I say "all eyes")! Seems that the wavelength/color of the light is just one important factor; intensity and brightness is certainly a relevant factor as well, and while shielding the lights to keep the light where it is needed and not going it all over the place is probably at least as important as the color. Seems that the models being installed and being considered both do a good job of shielding, which is good.

Bob Smith 3 months, 3 weeks ago

Always interesting when a deeply involved brand-new poster shows up.

Sean Rudisel 3 months, 3 weeks ago

So you created an account just to argue AMA findings?

Bob Smith 3 months, 3 weeks ago

If you search on Scott's name + LED, you'll get thousands of hits.

Ken Lassman 3 months, 3 weeks ago

That's because he's editor of the industry trade magazine Solid State Lighting Design. Who do you think he's going to represent?

Phillip Chappuie 3 months, 3 weeks ago

I trucked on out to the edge of town once and boogied past the welcome mat. It was at a house of blue lights.

Fred Whitehead Jr. 3 months, 3 weeks ago

"The color in the light......can kill you?? We needed a new devil in the dark.......

Larry Miller 3 months, 3 weeks ago

Most new cell phones and tablets have an option to turn down the blue light so using them in the evening does not interfere with going to sleep. While the AMA just came out with this recommendation, it has been reported as an issue for several years. The bluer light is treated by your body as time to be awake, making it harder to go to sleep.

Curtis Lange 3 months, 3 weeks ago

While that is true, I want people driving on city streets to stay awake. Make it as blue as possible.

Greg Cooper 3 months, 3 weeks ago

Besides, people aren't supposed to be sleeping in the streets anyway.

Michael Kort 3 months, 3 weeks ago

Next time at the grocery store notice the red meat in the case because you are being shown that meat with light from fluorescents strong in the greenish spectrum which literally makes your eyes see the red which is complimentary color of green ..

Take that steak outside and notice how the color of the meat changes......but that is really a change of the light source that the meat is being seen under and not the meat changing color .

The eye will play tricks on you depending on how accurately a given light sources is at containing all colors most nearly equally .

You might not see one color well or litteraly over see another color like the meat counter red because of how the eyes ( speaking generically ) work relative to different light sources

Green surgical gowns exist because green is the complimentary color of red which reduces eye strain when looking from those green clothes to that which is a red operation .

Someone at Disney Co did in door filming of animals under different types of florescent lights many years ago and discovered that animals became quarrelsome under certain colors of florescent lighting and got along sociably under other color of light .

Humans are distant relatives of chickens and birds ( said to upset the Bob's ) but light can wake us up, as with birds, as well as to unintentionally interfere with our sleep ..........I do like black out shades that cut out area lights from streets and neighbors .

I wonder what the Federal Highway Administration or the Insurance Institutes for Highway Saftey say about this issue ?....have they any studies ? because I distrust manufactures information because they will tell you anything...... to sell you anything !

Bob Smith 3 months, 3 weeks ago

Years ago, there was a tobacco industry shill who popped up here anytime a news story mentioned smoking. I suppose he found other corners to brighten.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.

loading...