Archive for Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Republican group including Kassebaum shows support for gay marriage

March 4, 2014


— A group of Republicans have come out in support of legalizing gay marriage in Utah and Oklahoma, arguing that allowing same-sex unions is consistent with the Western conservative values of freedom and liberty once championed by Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater.

A group that includes former Sen. Alan Simpson of Wyoming and former Sen. Nancy Kassebaum of Kansas plans to file a friend of the court brief Tuesday to a federal appeals court in Denver that is reviewing same-sex marriage bans in Utah and Oklahoma, said Denver attorney Sean Gallagher, whose firm wrote the 30-page argument.

The full list of current and former Republican lawmakers signing the brief won't be available until it's officially sent to the court later Tuesday, but Gallagher said many prominent Republicans are re-examining their stance on gay marriage.

The group call themselves "conservatives, moderates and libertarians who embrace the individual freedoms protected by our Constitution," embrace Reagan's idea of the Republican Party being a "big tent," and share Goldwater's belief that the party shouldn't "seek to lead anyone's life for him," according to a copy of the brief provided to The Associated Press.

"It is precisely because marriage is so important in producing and protecting strong and stable family structures that (we) do not agree that the government can rationally promote the goal of strengthening families by denying civil marriage to same-sex couples," the argument says in the conclusion.

The gay marriage bans in Utah and Oklahoma were passed by voters in 2004. They were overturned by separate federal judges in each state within a month of each other in December and January.

The Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal has assigned the same panel of judges to review both cases, which are on a fast track, but has decided to hold two different hearings. The court will discuss Utah's case on April 10 and Oklahoma's on April 17.

The appeals court must decide if it agrees with the federal judges in Utah and Oklahoma who ruled that the bans violate gay and lesbian couples' rights to due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment.

Last week, attorneys for three Utah gay and lesbian couples argued to the appeals court that Utah's same-sex-marriage ban has "cemented discrimination" in the state against gays and their children.

The opening brief filed in February by Utah state attorneys argued the 2004 voter-approved ban should stand because the optimal environment for raising children is with a mother and father.

Lawyers appealing the ruling in Oklahoma made a similar claim in their opening brief filed last week, saying overturning the ban would harm children, undermine society and make traditional marriages unstable. Attorneys for Oklahoma's gay couples who brought the lawsuit have until March 17 to submit their opening brief.

Dozens of groups are expected to file friend of the court briefs before the Tuesday midnight deadline. The American Military Partner Association and American Sociological Association have already filed.

The American Psychological Association and a group of religious organizations that include groups representing Episcopal, Unitarians and Methodists also plan to file briefs. The religious coalition includes Mormons for Equality, a group of members of The Church of the Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints pushing the faith to give fair and adequate treatment to gay and lesbian members.

At least 17 states, mostly in the Northeast, and Washington, D.C., allow same-sex marriage. Others may soon follow depending on how federal appeals courts, and eventually the U.S. Supreme Court, rule on state bans that have been overturned.

Including Utah and Oklahoma, six federal judges have issued pro-gay-marriage rulings since the Supreme Court's decision in Windsor v. U.S. in June that struck down part of the federal anti-gay-marriage law. The latest came last week in Texas.

In Kentucky, Gov. Steve Beshear, a Democrat, announced Tuesday the state will hire outside attorneys to appeal a judge's decision granting legal recognition to same-sex couples married in other states and countries. That came the state's attorney general, also a Democrat, announced that he would not pursue the case further.

Democratic attorneys general in at least seven states — Virginia, Pennsylvania, California, Illinois, Oregon, Kentucky and Nevada — have declined to defend same-sex-marriage bans that have been challenged in court by gay couples.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said last week that his state counterparts are not obligated to defend local laws banning same-sex marriage if they believe the laws violate the U.S. Constitution.

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes has vowed to continue defending the ban. The state has hired outside attorneys to fight their case, which could cost up to $300,000.

In making its case for gay marriage, the new filing from the Republican group points to decades-old words from Goldwater, the longtime U.S. Senator from Arizona who aggressively advocated for conservative principles. He died in 1998. The group cited this passage from his 1960 paper, "The Conscience of a Conservative."

"For the American Conservative, there is no difficulty in identifying the day's overriding political challenge: it is to preserve and extend freedom," it said. "As he surveys the various attitudes and institutions and laws that currently prevail in America, many questions will occur to him, but the Conservative's first concern will always be: Are we maximizing freedom?"


Clark Coan 3 years, 11 months ago

Well, Jesus clearly said marriage is between a man and woman. So, there should only be civil ceremonies or ceremonies conducted by pastors from non Christian churches such as Unitarian Universalist, Universal Life Church, Sunday Assembly and some Unity congregations.

Julius Nolan 3 years, 11 months ago

Not everyone is a "christian" and not everyone believes in a a mythical being called "jesus". I for one, also no longer believe in "Santa Claus", the Easter Bunny" or the "Tooth Fairy". But I also don't believe in forcing my beliefs on others. Why do these "christians"?

Beator 3 years, 11 months ago

...and you know this mythical stuff how again? And you are forcing your mythical beliefs on others.

Julius Nolan 3 years, 11 months ago

Would you explain how and in what manner I'm forcing what "mythical" beliefs of mine on others?

Seth Peterson 3 years, 11 months ago

If you have sound evidence for the Tooth Fairy, I'd love to hear it.

Greg Cooper 3 years, 11 months ago

See, here's the deal. It really does not matter a whit if this is a Christian country or not. The Constitution of the United States guarantees equal opportunity for the pursuit of each citizen's ability to live freely, without constraint as to religious beliefs or disbelief.

American law gives Christianity (or any other religion) the absolute right to believe in any deity and religion so long as that religion stops short of diminishing the other citizens' right of pursuit.

Bottom line? Religion does not drive this nation. Rule of law does, and that law, though it may espouse tenets supported by religions, is not, and can not be, diminished by religious demagoguery.

I believe strongly in the teachings of Jesus and the Christion tradition. I believe that the overriding teaching of Jesus is embodied in the line, "Love one another as you love yourself." Jesus never, ever said that we should practice discrimination of another's rights to believe whatever they wanted to believe. He did say that, in his God's world, believing in the teachings of that God gave one a "one-up" on others, but he did say that we were not to judge one another.

I don't care what religion you espouse, or how you worship your deity, but I care deeply that you not force your religious beliefs on the nation when they require that someone else's right to happiness be quashed. In my Christianity, no one peson is more important than any other. Judgement will come from the courts on earth, and God in the afterlife. If I'm wrong, so be it, but I will not be caught not allowing a gay person to pursue his/her right to happiness because I think he/she is inferior in his actions concerning sexuality.

And neither should anyone else.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.