Archive for Sunday, June 16, 2013

Endangered whooping cranes in middle of fight over management of Quivira National Wildlife Refuge

June 16, 2013


Expansion of hunting opportunities in the Quivira National Wildlife Refuge is being proposed by wildlife officials but faces opposition from birdwatchers who say the recommendation will put at risk the endangered whooping crane.

"What has become probably the most significant migratory stop for the whooping crane in Kansas could be substantially less accommodating for whooping cranes in the future," said Ron Klataske, executive director of Audubon of Kansas.

But Mike Oldham, manager of the Quivira National Wildlife Refuge in south-central Kansas, says he believes expanding access to hunting can be done while ensuring the safety of whooping cranes, a federally endangered species that is illegal to shoot.

"We carefully considered the risks to the federally endangered whooping cranes that migrate through during the hunting season when considering the expanded access," Oldham said.

A rest stop in Kansas

For the whooping crane, the tallest bird in North America and one of the rarest, the Quivira National Wildlife Refuge is a welcome sight.

Brought to the edge of extinction in the 1940s, there are about 600 whooping cranes remaining in the world.

The only self-sustaining flock, numbering about 270, migrates in the fall from the Wood Buffalo National Park in Alberta, Canada, to the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge on the Texas Gulf Coast. In the spring, it returns to Canada to breed.

That's a 5,000-mile arduous and sometimes dangerous journey.

The 22,135-acre refuge in Kansas is a safe stopover where the birds, some as tall as 5 feet with a wing span exceeding 7 feet, can rest and eat.

Currently, if "whoopers" are present at the refuge, hunting for other animals, such as ducks, geese and pheasant, is closed to avoid disturbing the whoopers and prevent accidentally shooting them.

This spring produced the second highest number of confirmed sightings of whooping cranes at 75, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. And last fall, 73 whooping cranes visited the refuge, which is about 240 miles west and south of Lawrence.

The closures due to Whoopers has resulted in some disappointed hunters, officials say.

"Whooping crane arrivals and departures are unpredictable, which makes it difficult for hunters to plan ahead. Public lands for hunting in Kansas are also limited, which exacerbates their frustration," according to a draft conservation plan for the refuge that has been put forward by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The plan notes that whooping cranes attract birders but adds, "We at the refuge have received many requests to reconsider our refuge-wide closures."

In addition, while deer and turkey hunting have never been allowed at the refuge, the plan states "there is interest in allowing these hunting activities in the future."

Plan and public comments under review

The 263-page document and the public comment it has generated are under review.

Under the draft proposal, instead of shutting down hunting when whoopers are present, the refuge would allow hunting but put areas off limits where whoopers are known to frequent. "Hunting boundaries would be adjusted to close areas frequently used by whooping cranes to hunting, and open new areas that have not previously been available for hunting," Oldham said. "The manager would have the authority to close any area being used by whooping cranes at any time. We believe that this approach will adequately protect whooping cranes, while also expanding hunting opportunities for the public to enjoy."

Klataske said the refuge should be going in the opposite direction from the recommendation and just shut down hunting entirely during the periods when whoopers are known be around.

"These whooping crane need places where they can go to rest, recuperate and recharge for the remainder of their migrations," Klataske said.

He said the draft proposal changes the purpose of the refuge, making it more of a hunting area.

"It will not be as attractive for people to come throughout the country to view birds and other wildlife. It is probably the best wildlife viewing destination that we have in the state of Kansas," he said.

But officials with the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism support the federal agency's recommendation, saying there is a need for more places to hunt.

"From out standpoint, the hunters and fishers of Kansas, we felt like there could be additional opportunity without jeopardizing the refuge's mission," said Keith Sexson, assistant secretary for fish, wildlife and boating with the state agency. "I can assure you that the Fish and Wildlife Service, because of their sensitivity to the whooping crane, they would not be entertaining this idea that would increase the chances of whooping crane being impacted."

The Fish and Wildlife agency says it hopes to approve a final plan by the end of the year.


riverdrifter 4 years, 9 months ago

Quivera and the Cheyenne Bottoms are both big areas: Quivera is about 35 square miles and the Bottoms a whopping 60 square miles. Both have always shut down hunting with the arrival of even a single whooper. Additionally, at both locations hunting is not allowed on most of the refuge at any time. Hunting cessation is frustrating, especially to those hunters who hauled their boats, decoys, dogs, etc. a long ways to hunt there. It's my experience that younger hunters (who are more likely on a time/money budget) complain the most. Older hunters have more time and seem to be more accepting of closures. One time we were hunting at the Bottoms when it was closed for a solitary juvenile whooper. The place was stiff with ducks and geese at the time. It hung out on a marsh for 3 days when finally a biologist was dispatched to "make sure it was not sick or injured". The whooper hauled hiney at her approach and hunting resumed the next day. Deer hunting at Quivera would pose no problem if it was limited to the firearms deer season which occurs in December, long after the cranes have left.

4chewnut 4 years, 9 months ago

Worth the read:

Let's not forget that changes were made in 2004 because hunters shot 3 whoopers. Let's not go backwards.

riverdrifter 4 years, 9 months ago

Those were (ostensibly) sandhill crane hunters who turned out to be jukes. Duck and goose hunters don't give cranes a second look. You paint with a mighty broad brush re wildfowlers.

Becca McMaster 4 years, 8 months ago

We certainly wouldn't want to "disappoint" hunters just to save the lives of a few significantly endangered cranes! What would the hunters have to do if they showed up and then discovered that they couldn't kill something? Certainly, just relaxing and enjoying the wildlife in all its splendor would not be possible when the purpose of the trip was to kill something. If splendid creatures like sandhill cranes and all the other birds at the "refuge" can't be shot, then they have no purpose for these people.

Wildlife and Parks should at least petition the federal agency to also change the name from "refuge" to "killing fields" since that will (has?) become the primary purpose.

To call it a "refuge" is beyond hypocritical to something more sadistic.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.