Advertisement

Archive for Saturday, January 5, 2013

Simons’ Saturday Column: Lawmakers should focus on nation, not re-election

January 5, 2013

Advertisement

Thursday, this nation’s 113th Congress convened with 82 new House members and 13 new senators among those taking the oath of office.

All House members were engaged in re-election efforts, and it’s a good bet all pledged to work in the best interests of the country and put partisan politics aside for the good of the country.

It’s likely those in contested Senate races made the same pledge relative to trying to bring about sound legislation.

It all sounds good, but what are the chances of these lofty campaign promises being fulfilled? Not good!

Rep. Matt Salmon, an Arizona Republican, didn’t sound optimistic when talking about the relationship between Congress and President Obama. He said, “It’s like the most dysfunctional family I’ve ever seen. It’s very frustrating that we can’t put aside some of our partisan differences.”

However, in their campaigns to gain voter support, House and Senate members, as well as President Obama, made many pledges about how they would vote on various thorny issues carried over from the previous Congress and how they would vote on policies favored by Obama. Too often, pledges are made and then broken.

Obama talks about wanting to work with Republicans to achieve legislation that he says is best for the country but, at the same time, he makes it clear he will veto legislation he does not personally favor. He does not want to compromise!

The seriousness of many issues facing Congress and how those issues will affect this nation and every citizen cannot be overstated. The national debt is a disgrace. The ever-increasing role or control of government in the lives of every American, the jobless situation, illegal immigration, the cost of entitlement programs and the sustainability of Social Security, the growing number of Americans who rely on government handouts and tax issues are just a few of the matters that merit serious attention and action by Congress.

However, far too many in Congress are focused on “how do I keep my job, how can I be re-elected,” rather than concentrating on “doing what is best for my country.” This means voting for programs and policies that will please the most voters in each state and House district across the country.

How can Congress fail to take positive action relative to the “fiscal cliff” matter and allow continued, uncontrolled growth of government? Lawmakers postpone, delay, kick the can down the road, talk out of both sides of their mouths, base actions on public polls rather than what’s best for the future of this country. They disregard what has made this country great and allow this nation and its people to slip and slide further into a socialized state.

Unfortunately, there doesn’t appear to be reason to hope for change in the actions and vision of Congress and the president based on what the public has witnessed over the past four years. The danger is Obama does not have to worry about being re-elected so he is free to do whatever he wishes to execute the policies and laws to change America as he called for when campaigning for his first term in the White House.

Who knows or who can predict the condition or level of personal freedom in this country four years from now? Sadly, those in Congress apparently don’t have the backbone or courage to place the country’s best interests in the forefront, rather than trying to appease their constituents and win their next re-election effort.

Comments

Trumbull 1 year, 3 months ago

"The national debt is a disgrace" Editorial Writer

I might also ad that willfully deciding not to pay the debt and default on our "credit card bill" raises the disgrace a 1000 times.

Everyone needs to remember this when the Republicans stall and threaten not to raise the debt ceiling. This is what they are proposing as a means of leverage and threaten a world crisis. Even if they are bluffing, this is a terribly dangerous and irresponsible thing to do. They are villains for doing so......just as they were in summer 2011.

0

JackMcKee 1 year, 3 months ago

Dolph, just stop. Take what little humility and shame you have left and retire.

2

JW1944 1 year, 3 months ago

2 simple things:

  1. Two Term limits for ALL congress

  2. Make ALL lobbyism illegal

If the American people have the guts to do these 2 things we can take this country back to the people, by the people, for the people, as it was intended to be. No more Billionaire Kock brothers buying Governors & big corporations making all the laws to benefit their bank accounts. Do these 2 things & just maybe we can get the true America back to the people, by the people, & for the people, and not just for the wealthiest 2%.

0

oneeye_wilbur 1 year, 3 months ago

Interesting, someone said bush went hoe, Obama went home and Dolph sits at home fretting about the med center and Washington dc.

Wanna bet Dolph will endorse the school bond issue and the rec center? Two local topics he could tackle sitting at home.

Tweedle dee, tweedy dim, small town press!

1

notaubermime 1 year, 3 months ago

I have to roll my eyes whenever someone criticizes anyone for not working with the Republicans. Really? The Republicans do not even work with the Republicans. Boehner could not even pass his Plan B in the House. If the Republicans could not even agree with each other enough to pass their own plan to avert the fiscal cliff in the one section of the government they have the majority, how can anyone else be expected to work with them?

5

Les Blevins 1 year, 3 months ago

Those who voted for George W. Bush voted for the $trillion dollar unfuned wars against the people of Iraq and Afghanistan and the economic problems we have in this country today.

6

Trumbull 1 year, 3 months ago

"That being said, Democrats sat on their hands for four years purposely not passing a budget and letting us edge closer and closer to this so called fiscal cliff, only to (and knowing the media would assist them) blame it all on Republicans"

This is a Republican talking point. It sounds like a lie or misinformation. I confess, I do not know why a budget has not been passed. I am more willing to take the opinion of someone who does not call the President and first lady "Barry and Moochelle".

4

disappointed_regressive 1 year, 3 months ago

Rahm Emanuel, now mayor of a city with murder off the charts, said never let a crisis go to waste.

That being said, Democrats sat on their hands for four years purposely not passing a budget and letting us edge closer and closer to this so called fiscal cliff, only to (and knowing the media would assist them) blame it all on Republicans. Brilliant Axelroidian politics

Obama can't help himself that he thinks government is the answer, not the private sector.

Meanwhile, Barry and Moochelle rack up a big tab in a lavish vacation in Honolulu. When Bush went on a vacation, just even to his ranch to clear brush, the left screamed bloody murder.

1

Trumbull 1 year, 3 months ago

We will have a real experiment to see.....The next crisis is just around the corner. If this is delayed or stalled by the Republicans, it will be proof enough.

A few points about the debt ceiling: 1) It is not about spending or budget.
2) It is about the United States keeping its word and paying its obligations. 3) If it is not raised, the United States will default on its debt/obligations. 4) If not raised, the US and the World economy will suffer severe consequences. 5) Budget cuts, tax rates, unemployment, job outsourcing, health care, etc are critical issues that must be addressed to solve our debt/defecit issue. Still the debt ceiling is independent of all of this, and is a completely different matter.

If the Republicans delay or use the next debt ceiling as a form of "leverage", they are practicing economic sabotage and holding the American public and business community hostage. If they do this, they need to be called out for it and booted out of office the next time they come up for a vote. Democrats and Republicans should both agree on the debt ceiling.

4

oneeye_wilbur 1 year, 3 months ago

Wonder why Dolph doesn't focus on local politics?

2

Norm Jennings 1 year, 3 months ago

The big smoke-screens are taxes and obstructionism.

The real problems are a dysfunctional legislative branch and the massive over-commitment of any available or reasonably projected US financial resources both now, and well into the future.

The states may very well have to be the agent of change to fix the Constitutional inadequacy that allows this dysfunction.

If the 113th congress doesn't deliver a budget by June 30th, their pay should be suspended until a budget bill is on the President's desk for signature.

This congress, and any congress that fails to offer a budget that progressively reduces the national deficit by at least 1% (and eventually the national debt), those individuals should be ineligible to participate in the next election.

All congressional retirement, healthcare, and other federal benefits need to mirror the benefits mandated by congressional legislation for all other US citizens.

For too many years the constitutional requirements of the congress have been allowed to languish unaddressed.

2

Laus_Deo 1 year, 3 months ago

Huh? How can this be!!!

Middle-class workers will take a bigger hit to their income proportionately than those earning between $200,000 and $500,000 under the new fiscal cliff deal, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

Earners in the latter group will pay an average 1.3 percent more - or an additional $2,711 - in taxes this year, while workers making between $30,000 and $200,000 will see their paychecks shrink by as much as 1.7 percent - or up to $1,784 - the D.C.-based think tank reported.

Overall, nearly 80 percent of households will pay more money to the federal government as a result of the fiscal cliff deal.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256972/Middle-earners-hit-hardest-revealed-workers-making-30-000-bigger-hit-earning-500-000-new-fiscal-deal.html

1

Trumbull 1 year, 3 months ago

I got a warm fuzzy feeling when I read the title, but then saw it was just another Obama critique after reading. He writes that the national debt is a disgrace and cries out against entiltements and government handouts (with no mention of the 4 trillion wars).

He also says Obama is unwilling to compromise. This is not true. He extended the Bush tax cuts during his 1st term. This time he compromised the increase in the tax rate from 250k to 400k.

Nothing is said about the Republican practice of obstructionism. They have flipped sides on issues that they were in favor of before Obama. And the Republicans also held us hostage and risked the credit rating of the United Statesduring the 2011 debt ceiling crisis. They created enormous uncertainty during the fiscal cliff crisis New Year's eve. They are now going to use the current debt ceiling agreement as leverage and thus create another crisis. All of this crisis is creating uncertainty and doing the country much harm. For this, I consider them villains and traitors.

These politicians remind me of lineman who refuse to block because they don't like their Quarterback. They want to see him get sacked without caring that it will hurt the team. The team is us. The United States of America.

7

scott3460 1 year, 3 months ago

"This means voting for programs and policies that will please the most voters in each state and House district across the country."

Oh, the horror!!

3

Ken Lassman 1 year, 3 months ago

If you truly believe what you said, Dolph, are you ready to support fundamental campaign finance reform that removes our legislative branch from the grips of the continuous pursuit for campaign funds and thereby becoming beholden to those highest bidders? After all, this is the primary source of our inability to act in a bipartisan way that is best for our country.

An example of what fundamental campaign reform might look like: wouldn't it be cool to make it the law of the land that any political campaign contribution must be evenly disbursed between the top two or three candidates? This would be based on the clear evidence that a special interest contribution given to a candidate is a form of bribery that shifts the legislator's allegiance from representing individual voters in her or his district to just being a proxy for that big contributor. This would free up our legislators from the daily fundraising grind, would perhaps encourage the best members of our community to consider running for public office, and remind the office holder that they are there to represent everyone since interests from every special interest would have contributed to their campaign coffers, and their re-election would be based on how they performed as representatives, not whose campaign coffer was the biggest and who was the biggest contributors to it.

Furthermore, our current system actually limits our first amendments right to free speech in that if you hold a viewpoint different than the legislator's big contributors, you will not be able to speak with that legislator about it and they will be constrained from listening to you lest the big contributor withdraws their money because they heard about your meeting with said legislator.

5

weeslicket 1 year, 3 months ago

last sentence fixed: Sadly, those in Congress apparently don’t have the backbone or courage to place MY best interests in the forefront, rather than trying to appease ME and win MY (editorial support).

1

disappointed_regressive 1 year, 3 months ago

Judging by all the news of people emptying retailer's guns and ammo shelves and stockpiling goods and doomsday prepping, you'd think we're heading for Armegeddon from hell. I'm sure they're all just right wing nutcases, as observant would describe them. I guess it is what it is at this point. Gods' will?

0

disappointed_regressive 1 year, 3 months ago

"Twill be interesting to see what America looks like in 4-5 years. I can assure you it won't be what the extremist left wished for in their slavish devotion and deep, deep love of Obama.

0

disappointed_regressive 1 year, 3 months ago

Simple. It's all Republican's fault and they are nothing but obstructionists. Checks and balances? Meh, who needs 'em. We've got a community disorganizer and his gaggle of far-left ideologues on the job. Theyr'e fixing all "old white males" mistakes of years past.

0

Laus_Deo 1 year, 3 months ago

With last year’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling and President Obama’s reelection, it appears that implementation of ObamaCare is a virtual certainty. One of the most impactful portions of the new measures are the federal government’s elimination of massive subsidies to private insurers and the gradual reduction of the rate of growth of payments to providers. This provision will mean a reduction of over $716 billion of spending in the healthcare sector over the next 10 years.

That’s a huge chunk of change. Sounds like a lot of people are not going to make it out of here. There are no free lunches you know.

0

Gandalf 1 year, 3 months ago

Obama refuses to compromise? Strange I thought he did offer one. But what teapubs want is capitulation not compromise. And as far as being a leader goes, even the House speaker cannot lead the mindless rable of the the teapubs. And he is elected only by republicans.

7

WilburM 1 year, 3 months ago

Where is the criticism of Yoder and Jenkins for voting against Sandy aid, rather than worrying about their Tea Party minority on the far right? This piece doesn't pass the smell test.

9

observant 1 year, 3 months ago

Thought when I saw headline Dolph was finally calling for some compromising and working together. See I was dead wrong, just another attack on Obama. Like old saying, Zebra or was it a Skunk that never can change its stripes? Either way, just another of Dolph's rants against those who don't toe the right wing nutcase line.

8

appleaday 1 year, 3 months ago

Maybe now that Mitch McConnell's number one job can't be making Obama a one-term president, he'll look toward the country's well-being. Or not. Obama definitely has his problems communicating and working with Congress, but Congress overwhelmingly does almost anything they can to obstruct his proposals. Both sides, Mr Simon, are at fault. It's really time to quit being so partisan and start working together. Any time one "side" wins and the other "side" loses, the American population and any resolution of our problems gets cast aside. The recent refusal to vote on aid for Hurricane Sandy victims is a good example.

4

Robert Rauktis 1 year, 3 months ago

"They disregard what has made this country great and allow this nation and its people to slip and slide further into a socialized state."

So should a federal state take care of its constituents in the event that unprovoked and unanticipated circumstances require your assistance? Or should you be inadequate and cowards like the Kansas congressional delegation? And I'd guess their constituents?

I'd say their is a lot more chance of future tornadoes in Kansas in places requiring federal assistance.

5

Commenting has been disabled for this item.