Archive for Monday, February 25, 2013

Editorial: Activities oversight

The job of integrating public school activities and athletics into the overall educational experience is best handled by educators

February 25, 2013

Advertisement

Parental involvement is a vital part of any child’s education. But legislation that would revamp the governing boards for interscholastic leagues in Kansas and the Kansas State High School Activities Association runs the risk of upsetting a system that has done a good job of guiding high school athletics and other activities for many years.

As outlined in a Journal-World story earlier this week, a bill currently being considered in the Kansas Legislature would require that non-educator community members hold half the seats on the governing boards for all of the state’s interscholastic leagues. It also would enlarge the KSHSAA executive board and require that four of the 14 seats go to non-educators.

A main goal for at least some supporters of the bill is to give parents of student-athletes more authority over how competitions are governed. In theory, that philosophy seems sound, but a person doesn’t need to attend very many youth sports competitions — at any level — to see examples of parents who get a little too involved in their children’s athletic endeavors.

House Speaker Ray Merrick, a longtime critic of KSHSAA, said that many school districts see the group as “a dictatorial agency” and that parents are “the ones that should be responsible.” The activities association may seem “dictatorial,” but turning the operation of high school activities solely over to parents would be nothing short of chaotic. Some of the parents who are focused on gaining more control over these activities probably have children who aspire to become scholarship athletes in Division 1 colleges. Do they think the NCAA, which governs college athletics, will be any less “dictatorial”?

Here’s the bottom line: If activities, and especially athletic programs, are a legitimate part of the educational experience at Kansas high schools, they should remain under the control of the education system. It certainly can be argued that all of these activities build school spirit and the value of hard work. They also can teach the importance of being part of a team and of adhering to the rules that guide their participation on that team. Those are good life lessons.

In our sports-crazed society, it’s easy to give athletics too much importance in the overall educational scheme. The nature of the job it does almost guarantees that the KSHSAA will draw some criticism, but watering down the authority of educators to oversee athletics and activities in the state’s public schools isn’t a step in the right direction.

Comments

Tammy Copp-Barta 3 years, 6 months ago

So you're saying that none of the educators on the board have children and are parents? That they don't have vested interests in decisions as well? That non-educator parents are not smart enough to sit on these boards because they may not make the "right" decisions? I don't see from your article where they are "turning over" the control to parents, just having half the seats go to them and 4 on the board. Funny - that doesn't seem like "turning it over" to the "non-educators" to me. Neither of my children are athletic - so you don't think I could be a good choice to fill those seats even though I'm not an educator - but do love sports? Educator types - like you Mr. Editor - seem to think you're all smarter than the rest of us "non-educator folk". Most of us have more life experience and common sense than you "educator/educated" types will ever have.

buffalo63 3 years, 6 months ago

Too many times I have seen "parents" be elected to the school board and have an agenda that attempts to give their child an advantage. I would rather see a board member that has no child currently in school, rather be interested in the community and education.

Paul R Getto 3 years, 6 months ago

KSHSAA is flawed because it is run by humans. It is,however,doing just fine and is one of the more conservative associations. They try to promote fair play and limits on the number of games, which is good. Do you really want to play 60+ basketball games a year like some states do? Students need to be in class and play ball. If we turn over activities to parents or non educators they might not think about academics, just their "son who will play pro ball someday." KSHSAA is doing well enough to be left alone by the KS KLOWN KAR, AKA the Kansas Legislature. Good editorial.

Richard Heckler 3 years, 6 months ago

Focus on academics and keep the legislature BUSY doing something important such as taking a stand against Sam Brownback in the name of democracy and fiscal responsibility.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.