Archive for Saturday, February 2, 2013

Tax talk, anti-union bills dominate legislative discussion at Lawrence Chamber breakfast

February 2, 2013


State Reps. John Wilson, D-Lawrence, and Tom Sloan, R-Lawrence, confer Saturday during the Lawrence Chamber of Commerce&squot;s "Eggs and Issues" meeting.

State Reps. John Wilson, D-Lawrence, and Tom Sloan, R-Lawrence, confer Saturday during the Lawrence Chamber of Commerce's "Eggs and Issues" meeting.

Gov. Sam Brownback’s tax plan and anti-union legislation advancing through the Statehouse dominated discussion Saturday at the Lawrence Chamber of Commerce’s first Eggs and Issues meeting of the 2013 legislative session.

Democratic legislators said Brownback, a Republican, was driving state finances into the ground by pushing through massive income tax cuts last year and proposing more this year.

Brownback has said the cuts will boost economic growth and put more money into the pockets of Kansans. He has said he wants to eventually eliminate the state personal income tax, calling it a “glide path to zero.”

But state Sen. Tom Holland, D-Baldwin City, and the ranking minority member on the Senate Assessment and Taxation Committee, said, “There is no glide path to zero. From a budgetary standpoint, this is crash and burn.”

House Minority Leader Paul Davis, D-Lawrence, handed out a state budget profile produced by the nonpartisan Kansas Legislative Research Department that shows Brownback’s tax plan will produce a $781.5 million budget shortfall within five years.

Davis said that shortfall would occur even assuming that Brownback’s proposals are approved to extend what was supposed to be a temporary sales tax increase, eliminate mortgage interest and property tax deductions for homeowners, realize savings from the privatization of Medicaid, and the state experiences 4 percent annual tax revenue growth.

“What we have here is a pretty awful budget situation,” Davis said, which he blamed on last year’s tax cuts signed into law by Brownback that reduced income tax rates and eliminated income taxes for 191,000 business owners.

Now, Davis said, Brownback “wants to double down” with more income tax cuts.

Republicans have downplayed the Legislative Research budget profile, saying that it doesn’t take into account job growth that will result from the tax cuts. They also say the 4 percent growth projection for state revenues is less than what the state is currently experiencing.

On the issue of anti-union legislation, the Douglas County legislative delegation was asked about House Bill 2023, which has been approved by the House and now goes to the Senate where it is expected to pass.

The bill would prohibit the Kansas National Education Association and public sector unions from automatically deducting voluntary contributions from employees and using those funds for political advocacy.

Republican supporters of the measure said it was needed because some teachers felt pressured to donate to political causes they didn’t support. Opponents said no examples of undue pressure had been shown.

State Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka, whose district includes part of Douglas County, said the next anti-union bill to surface in the Legislature is House Bill 2123, which would eliminate paycheck deductions for union dues and make collective bargaining optional.

On the issue of judicial selection, state Rep. Tom Sloan, R-Lawrence, said a proposed constitutional amendment that would give the governor more power in picking appellate judges was going nowhere in the House.

“There are not sufficient votes in the Kansas House to pass a constitutional amendment to change the way judges are selected and appointed,” Sloan said.

Proposed constitutional amendments require a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate before they can be placed on the ballot for voters to consider.

In the 125-member House, that would require 84 votes.

Others speaking at the Lawrence Chamber meeting, which was held at the Alvamar Country Club, were state Sen. Marci Francisco and state Reps. Barbara Ballard and John Wilson.


Richard Heckler 5 years, 2 months ago

Think long term impact.

It isn't only union wages that go down. It's most wages. If all unions get busted and those millions upon millions are receiving less that translates into most all other workers making less money because workers across America will quit spending money.

When workers quit spending money what happens for the long term?

People go out of business thus more job losses.

Carpenters,plumbers and electricians go out of business because workers cannot afford more houses.

Property values sink because there is no money and foreclosures continue to rise.

New auto sales will slump AGAIN.

MORE retirement plans will go up in smoke because Wall Street will take a dive because spending which drives investors is no where to be found.

Millions more will not be able to pay for medical insurance.

Sales taxes will increase because all other tax sources have gone up in smoke.

Infrastructure will go longer without maintenance and/or replacement.

This is but a short list.

UneasyRider 5 years, 2 months ago

Could someone explain why it says there are 4 comments and only 1 is available to read?

Thomas Bryce Jr. 5 years, 2 months ago

Probably The Editors thought the posts were off topic and removed them. They have been doing that alot lately. Merrill was prolific on this topic.

Frank A Janzen 5 years, 2 months ago

I don't know...maybe Merrill's comments count more.

Matthew Herbert 5 years, 2 months ago

I think something is wrong with LJworld; about 1/2 of my posts this week haven't ever posted

Cant_have_it_both_ways 5 years, 2 months ago

State Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka, whose district includes part of Douglas County, said the next anti-union bill to surface in the Legislature is House Bill 2123, which would eliminate paycheck deductions for union dues and make collective bargaining optional. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ YES!!!! It should read Pro-taxpayer bill...but oh well.

Nikonman 5 years, 2 months ago

You can have utility bills, credit card payments, car payments, etc., deducted from your bank account every month if you so choose. So what's the problem here? If the unions want regular payments, just have them take it out of your account each month. I'm sure most banks do this now.

chootspa 5 years, 2 months ago

You can have United Way donations directly withdrawn from your paycheck, too. So what's the problem? Why change it?

KSManimal 5 years, 2 months ago

The problem, Nikonman, is that the majority of the bill has nothing to do with paycheck deductions, and everything to do with revoking free speech. Since the JW and other media outlets continue to IGNORE this part of HB 2023; I will share it here AGAIN (for about the fifth or sixth time):

"It shall be a prohibited practice for a public employee organization to endorse candidates, or spend any of its income, including any income in the form of or derived from any dues, fees, assessments or any other periodic payments, directly or indirectly, to engage in political activities as defined in paragraph (2). (2) For the purposes of this section, "political activities" means any activity carried out for the purpose of influencing, in whole or part, any election for a state, local government or board of education office, including activities or causes of a partisan political or ideological nature engaged in by a public employee organization for such purpose, and including contributions to a political committee, continuing political employee committee, or both, for the purpose of aiding or promoting the endorsement, nomination, election or defeat of any candidate for public office of the state or of a county, municipality or school district, or the passage or defeat of any public question."

Any of you who still think this is about payroll deduction...please explain how the above - cut & pasted directly from HB 2023 - has anything whatsoever to do with paycheck deductions?

JayhawkFan1985 5 years, 2 months ago

The GOP thinks the world is divided into makers and takers. I think the entire GOP is made up of haters. I hope the rest of us are love and respecters.

Matthew Herbert 5 years, 2 months ago

I would argue that those who spend endlessly with no means of actually paying the tab (both Dems and Repubs alike) must hate their grandchildren and children. Our growing national debt is the greatest threat our country faces.

buffalo63 5 years, 2 months ago

"collective bargaining optional", yeah I can see where this is heading. Brownie didn't say NO to this but gives cover those who refuse to bargain. It is the my way or the highway, trample on worker rights, screw the "takers" mentality. Oh! I forgot, it's the teachers fault we are this mess.

lunacydetector 5 years, 2 months ago

there are a lot of people who will take their windfall of no state income tax and buy something nice. there will be people that no longer want their "mandatory" union dues taken out and they'll go buy themselves something nice....cry me a river. nice platform for these politicians though at our local chamber of frat rat / sorority girl phony baloney non-commercers (because they've never had to work at all or they work for the government-almost the same thing).

Commenting has been disabled for this item.