Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Plans for tighter fingerprint requirements for teachers raising concerns

December 11, 2013

Advertisement

— The Kansas State Department of Education is still drafting new regulations that would require all teachers to submit fingerprints and undergo extensive background checks as a condition for keeping their licenses, but officials say those plans are already raising concerns among teachers in some districts.

"Teachers and some teachers unions have gotten upset," said Scott Gordon, assistant general counsel for the agency, who is drafting those proposed regulations.

Gordon updated the State Board of Education today on the progress being made in coming up with the new requirements.

One of the concerns, Gordon said, is that some districts require fingerprint checks as a condition of employment. However, those fingerprints cannot be transferred to the state to be used for licensing requirements, Gordon told the state board, because legally they may only be used by the school districts for their background checks.

If the Department of Education wants to conduct its own check, he said, state law requires a separate fingerprint card to be submitted to the agency.

That means some teachers may have to pay multiple times to submit multiple sets of fingerprints — at $50 each, often at their own expense — all basically for the same purpose.

Officials from the Kansas National Education Association, the state's largest teachers union, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Lawrence school district requires name-based criminal background checks on all new employees who have lived continuously in Kansas for the past 10 years, according to district spokeswoman Julie Boyle. All other new teachers in the district are required to submit fingerprints through the Lawrence Police Department, although the district pays the cost of those background checks.

The State Board of Education called for the new rules in September as part of an effort to strengthen enforcement of state laws and regulations that prohibit anyone found to have committed certain crimes from receiving or renewing a teaching license.

The previous month, the state board voted to revoke the licenses of several individuals who'd been found to have committed various crimes, including some who engaged in illegal sexual activity with their students.

Since 2002, the state has required all new teachers applying for their initial license to submit fingerprints and undergo an extensive criminal background check. But there are an estimated 35,000 other teachers in Kansas who already have licenses who have never undergone those checks by the state.

One Kansas statute prohibits the state board from granting or renewing a license to anyone who has been convicted of or entered a diversion agreement for various crimes, including sex offenses, violent crimes or drug-related offenses.

A separate Department of Education regulation goes even further, allowing the board to suspend or revoke a license for a much wider range of offenses, including misdemeanor drug offenses. It also includes people who have been fired or disciplined by a school district for such offenses, even if no criminal charge is ever filed.

The statute also requires county and district attorneys to report to the department the names, addresses and Social Security numbers of anyone in their jurisdiction "who has been determined to have committed any offense or act specified" in the act.

But Department of Education officials have said very few local prosecutors comply with that part of the statute. And even if they did, Gordon said, it would pose an administrative burden for agency officials to cross-check all those names against the database of licensed teachers.

Part of the upcoming regulation, he said, will be a provision to enroll in the FBI's "Rap Back" program, which would automatically notify the agency whenever someone whose fingerprints are on file is subsequently arrested or charged with certain offenses.

Gordon said he expects to present the draft regulation to the state board "within the next couple of months."

After that, the draft would be submitted to the Kansas Attorney General's office for review. The state board would then have to open a public comment period and schedule a public hearing before voting to enact the regulation.

Comments

Lane Signal 4 months, 1 week ago

I think this is all part of a larger effort to discourage people from becoming public school teachers. The radical right wants to take away their collective bargaining rights, cut their budgets to the bone and now treat them like criminals. The radical right's agenda is to marginalize public education so they can argue for privatization. One way to do that is to mistreat teachers. Look at the right's agenda. It does not include strong support for public education. The worse our public schools suffer and the greater their challenges in meeting student's needs, the stronger the right's argument for privatization becomes. Brownie and his crew want the public schools to fail. This is just one more small part of that effort.

I suppose it's pointless to require state legislators to be finger printed and submit to background checks. Their most sinister and sleazy acts are committed in the Capital Building for everyone to see.

2

David Reber 4 months, 1 week ago

"The statute also requires county and district attorneys to report to the department the names, addresses and Social Security numbers of anyone in their jurisdiction "who has been determined to have committed any offense or act specified" in the act.

But Department of Education officials have said very few local prosecutors comply with that part of the statute."

So.....rather than ask the DA's to actually follow existing law; we'll just presume all teachers are guilty until proven innocent, and make 'em each pay $50 out-of-pocket for a set of fingerprints.

I wonder which for-profit fingerprinting company lobbied for this idea.

1

Beator 4 months, 1 week ago

Do they need a picture ID with those prints?

0

William Weissbeck 4 months, 1 week ago

And yet we worry about the security of the Obamacare web site. Would be nice if the LJW was a little more in depth. Do you mean to tell me that a low level pot possession could keep you from getting a license?

0

Matthew Herbert 4 months, 1 week ago

Are the finger prints a teacher pays to have given to their building different than the ones sent to the state? This is 2013, you can't tell me there is no way other than having it redone to transmit that information to the state. This is nothing more than bureaucratic inefficiency and per the usual its resulting effect will only hurt those who can least absorb it.

1

Commenting has been disabled for this item.