Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Editorial: Boeing plans

If a last-minute pitch for a new Boeing plant in Wichita falls short, state officials should revisit their strategy to reduce the possibility of similar disappointments in the future.

December 4, 2013

Advertisement

According to recent news reports, Boeing executives are meeting with senior officials from five to 15 states trying to land a new Boeing commercial aircraft manufacturing plant. The plant would produce the Boeing 777X passenger airliner and would create thousands of jobs.

Boeing officials have set a Dec. 10 deadline to accept bids from the states seeking this prized manufacturing facility.

Last week, Kansas was not among the states that were in the running for the giant economic development plum. However, Gov. Sam Brownback confirmed on Monday that Kansas was “back in it” and would “take a shot” at attracting the new plant.

According to the news reports, as well as some top Kansas officials, Boeing started shopping for a new home for its Washington state manufacturing facility after its machinists union rejected a proposed contract that would have led to the 777X being produced at that plant.

It seems Wichita would be an ideal location for the new plant given the current facilities in Wichita, which probably could be renovated at considerably less cost than building a new plant elsewhere. Wichita also offers a well-trained work force with experience in the aviation business.

However, the union that rejected the Boeing contract proposal in Washington reportedly is the same group that caused Boeing officials to close their operation in Wichita. Boeing officials are said to have told Kansas leaders that they would not consider a Wichita site because of the union situation.

If these explanations are accurate, it seems that state and local leaders, along with Boeing and union officials, could get creative in coming up with a workable plan in which all parties would be winners. Wichita has a rich history as a hub for manufacturing numerous types and sizes of airplanes. The work force is well trained and they do excellent work.

Kansas and Wichita should work hard to advance their reputation as a superior location to build airplanes and as a center of talented and highly productive workers. Kansas seems to be coming late to this party, but the effort is worthwhile considering the benefits this plant could bring to Kansas. If the state fails to attract this project, it should cause Kansas officials to reassess their efforts and try to get their acts together to minimize the chances for similar embarrassing shutouts in the future.

Comments

Bob Zimmerman 4 months, 2 weeks ago

If you do some research on Boeing, you will see that other locations make more sense compared to Wichita: San Antonio, STL, Long Beach CA, and Washington state. There's a reason Boeing moved out of Wichita in 2012: high costs and a dismal place for hi-end engineering talent.

Besides, Brownback and the state of Kansas are a minor league team compared to the other states. They can't compete with incentives.

Besides again: I thought Wichita wanted to forgo aircraft mfg and pursue "biocomposites" companies. Oooops...that idea didn't work out.

0

Richard Heckler 4 months, 2 weeks ago

BOEING has done well over the decades extracting tons of corporate welfare dollars yet they move about in perpetual search of evermore corporate welfare.

Wichita taxpayers got shafted in the end.

This whole concept of bribing corporations is not in the best interest of taxpayers. White collars keep asking for more and more and more and taxes go up and up and up and up.

If one city shells out an over abundance of tax favors a vital part of that economic community leaves only to relocate elsewhere perhaps leaving behind a devastated local economy as a result.

Which is to say the new city economy will be subjected to the same lack of respect at some point in time while at the same time experiencing a major loss of tax revenue.

How is it that communities do not need all of the tax revenues that are lost on corporate welfare?

2

Commenting has been disabled for this item.