Advertisement

Archive for Thursday, August 1, 2013

Editorial: Resort plan

It would have been nice to have more than one proposal for a resort in Clinton State Park, but the state should give due consideration to the plan that was submitted.

August 1, 2013

Advertisement

Maybe Clinton Lake isn’t the hottest potential development property on the horizon.

Only one firm responded to the Kansas Department of Administration after the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism issued a request for proposals for a conference center and hotel intended to make the lake a regional destination.

Good luck with that, apparently.

No details have been released on the plan that was submitted, but here’s what the state was looking for, based on specifications developed by a national hotel industry consulting firm:

• A 175-room hotel

• A conference center, including a 6,500-square-foot ballroom and about 9,000 square feet of additional meeting room space

• Three restaurants, including a full-service restaurant, a lakeside bar and grill with courtyard, and a poolside bar and grill

• A spa

• An outdoor pool

• An indoor/outdoor pool

• A water sports center, which would include equipment for kayaking, sailing, wakeboards, jet skiing and water skiing

• An outdoor sports center, to include hiking guides, bike rentals, and sports court. Guests also would be expected to have access to the city-owned Eagle Bend Golf Course, east of Clinton Dam.

Currently, the state park is not connected to the city’s water and sewer service, and the development group also would have to make the necessary arrangements with the city of Lawrence to extend those services to the site. That may or may not include a request for the city to financially support the development by subsidizing the utility extensions.

The resort concept sounds good, although the idea is getting a bit ancient. The development firm that responded includes in its leadership one of the individuals who offered a proposal in 2001. (Let’s hope it isn’t the same old plan, dusted off.)

Regardless, the single proposal should be evaluated on its merits. Although it would have been greatly preferable to have received competing ideas and plans in response to the solicitation, the state should give the one it received serious consideration. It’s time to fish or cut bait on this concept for the lake.

Comments

Scott Morgan 8 months, 2 weeks ago

How about a waterside lodge and a Lowe's? Lay in a Dick's Sporting Goods, with a floating Olive Garden/Red Lobster tied to a major chain grocery store/marina.

1

oneeye_wilbur 8 months, 3 weeks ago

At least props as were solicited. KU did not do that with three lots at 11th ans Indiana, well if you call hiding the listing in te Kansas Register and oe bid from Frotzel.

JW. dd not "investigate" that!

0

Kookamooka 8 months, 3 weeks ago

Sad that there weren't more proposals. Competition can't thrive in a vacuum. I wonder if Fritzel and the other developers feel they have "Played out their hand" with the city in terms of getting sewers and infrastructure freebies. The other developers seem to have their minds on other things and have played this "resort" game at Clinton before. However, maybe new blood is necessary. I'd like to see a different architecturally inspiring structure built. Everyone know what a "compton" building looks like. It's always more of the same. Let's let some new blood in and maybe we'll see a kinder, gentler, more customer friendly space for all to use.

I have 0 interest in the sport facility spearheaded by Fritzels, but I love to Kayak!

0

Pheps 8 months, 3 weeks ago

If I was going to build a resort, it would be in a geographically pleasing area to the eye. Or, at the very least, an area that had some foot traffic.

What might work in the barren Clinton Lake area, is a Casino/Motel arrangement. That might increase foot traffic to Kansas.

0

Dont_Tread_On_Me 8 months, 3 weeks ago

What should be happening first is talking to any/all of the interested firms and asking why they did not submit a proposal? What scared them off? Maybe those questions could be addressed and the project sent back out for proposals.

As of right now, I would say something is wrong too. There is a major element missing.

0

Ken Lassman 8 months, 3 weeks ago

Please. Cut bait. I'm glad the JW recognizes that this really is a can of worms.

1

Commenting has been disabled for this item.