Advertisement

Archive for Monday, April 8, 2013

Abortion rights supporters will ask Brownback to reject bills, but he is likely to sign them into law

April 8, 2013

Advertisement

— Supporters of a woman’s right to have an abortion will deliver petitions today to Gov. Sam Brownback, urging him to veto bills on abortion, but Brownback will most likely sign the measures into law.

Brownback spokeswoman Sara Arif said Monday that the governor hasn’t read the bills yet but plans to do so. “He is a pro-life governor and anticipates signing them,” Arif said.

Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union, Kansas NOW and the MainStream Coalition have scheduled a news conference in opposition to the latest abortion measures that were approved last week by the Legislature by large margins.

House Bill 2253 is a wide-ranging proposal that declares that life begins at fertilization and that blocks tax breaks for abortion providers and tax deductions for medical expenses for an abortion. The bill also requires that physicians provide women information about breast cancer as a potential risk of abortion. The National Cancer Institute has concluded that abortion doesn’t increase the risk of cancer.

And the measure includes a ban on sex-selection abortions, even though no evidence has been presented that this happens in Kansas.

Another measure headed to the governor, Senate Bill 142, would prevent parents of a child born with birth defects from suing their doctor under a “wrongful birth” claim.

Kansans for Life described the bill as “civil rights for the unborn,” but abortion rights advocates said the proposal would allow a doctor to not tell a woman that her fetus has a severe defect because of the doctor’s concern over a potential abortion.

Since becoming governor, Brownback has signed into law several bills sought by anti-abortion advocates. Some of these laws continue to be challenged in court.

Comments

Agnostick 1 year ago

I'm also interested in seeing how these folks handle this foolishness. Scott Rothschild, this might make a good follow-up phone call for you.

"For appointments or to speak with one of our nurses please call: (316) 687-2112"

0

Cait McKnelly 1 year ago

Hell would freeze over before Sam would veto this bill. Not even telling him the sheer amount of money it will cost the state to defend it in court just to watch it lose would stop him. (I'm pretty sure he's already aware of it.) He's not a "fiscal conservative". He is a religious right anti-abortion zealot who will cram his agenda down the throats of the state's citizens no matter what it costs or how they feel. He has the "powah" and he's going to damn sure use it.
Brownback will never get to be president of "Murrica". I'm pretty sure he knows that now. But by god he can be a tin horn dictator in his own little fast drying up mud puddle with the rest of his bully boys. Now shut up and give him your lunch money.

2

IKU57 1 year ago

Speaking of lawsuits....

On the one hand we have people wanting to eliminate babies between mating couples. And on the other hand, we have couples demanding infertility coverage from tax payer funded Obamacare.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/faithonthecouch/2013/04/mandated-infertility-treatment-for-homosexual-couples/

Now how does a state handle this?

0

Centerville 1 year ago

Too bad the LJW chose not to report on the WSJ's takedown of the opponents of these bills. It was witty and entertaining but would have tweaked the carefully constructed world view that the LJW is so careful to protect.

1

oletimer 1 year ago

We have a bigger chance of brownback leaving office than not signing that bill. anti-abortion crybabies voted him in just for this purpose. he is not going to bite the hand that feeds him. get this over with and move on to getting a real budget that won't break the state. Problem is he has not idea how to do that. His previous comments and actions prove that. I hope his wife (poor girl) does their financial dealings, or they would be broke also.

3

Commenting has been disabled for this item.