Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, October 28, 2012

Douglas County Commission, District 2: Thellman vs. Male

October 28, 2012

Advertisement

Nancy Thellman likes to say that the job of a county commissioner “isn’t just about roads and bridges anymore.” County government today has a larger role in economic development, attracting jobs to the community and providing social services throughout the county that improve the quality of life.

Thellman, a Democrat, has taken a broad view during her first term of what constitutes economic development. For example, she has led efforts to develop and market local historical and cultural assets as tourist destinations by establishing the Natural and Cultural Heritage Grant Project and strengthening Douglas County’s role in the Freedom’s Frontier National Heritage Area.

“For me, it’s about all kinds of jobs,” Thellman said. “Not just factory, but the high-tech bioscience jobs, agricultural jobs and tourism-related employment.”

Her challenger, Republican Frank Male, agrees that economic development is a top priority. But he says the county should refocus its efforts on attracting what he calls “primary jobs,” which he describes as more traditional manufacturing or service-oriented jobs.

“The idea is that something is made or done in Douglas County that is sold somewhere else,” Male said. For example, “Hallmark Cards are made here and sold in California. The money from California comes back here, pays wages for Douglas County citizens, pays their health insurance, and also the property taxes that Hallmark pays on their building are paid to Douglas County. ... It’s new money to Douglas County, and it starts churning in our local economy.”

Male has also criticized funding of the Heritage Grant program, saying in an online chat at the Journal-World that he considers it “more of a want than a need” and that “core services like public health and safety, roads and bridges, and other public works projects” should be given higher priority.

Thellman and Male are competing for the county commission seat from District 2, which covers portions of East Lawrence and most of eastern Douglas County, including Eudora and Baldwin City. Both live on small farms in rural Douglas County: Thellman in Grant Township north of Lawrence; Male in Eudora Township south of Eudora.

Male is co-owner of a local landscaping business, Lawrence Landscape, 600 Lincoln. He is also active in the Lawrence Chamber of Commerce and is finishing a three-year term on its board.

Thellman is an ordained Presbyterian minister who served as an associate pastor at First Presbyterian Church and Plymouth Congregational Church in Lawrence before she was elected to the commission in 2008.

The two candidates have also taken different positions on developing industrial property in Douglas County.

Business and government officials have long debated the need to open more property along the I-70 corridor to industrial development.

Thellman says she has supported efforts by the city of Lawrence to restrict development around the airport, citing concerns about runoff that would affect North Lawrence, the high cost of extending public infrastructure, and her desire to protect that area for agricultural use.

Most of the property in industrial parks along the west Lawrence interchange are already occupied. The only land near Lawrence with access to I-70 is located near the Lecompton interchange, along what’s commonly known as the Farmers Turnpike.

In 2011, Thellman was the only city or county commissioner who voted against a proposed “island annexation” in that area.

Thellman said she supports the idea of developing that area but believes it should be done as part of a comprehensive plan, and not through spot annexations of land that is not contiguous with the current city limits.

An earlier attempt at an island annexation in that area in 2008 was rejected by the Kansas Court of Appeals. That case is still on appeal at the Kansas Supreme Court.

Male said he supports industrial development near the airport but recognizes that restrictions imposed by the city limit those possibilities. He also supports developing the Farmers Turnpike area.

Male has also been critical of increased spending by the county for certain social services, including the Lawrence Community Shelter.

The county recently purchased land near the county jail, primarily to build a new Public Works facility. But the purchase also paved the way for relocating the homeless shelter to that area, where Thellman says it will be better able to provide job training and other services for its clients.

In addition, the county’s contribution to the center will go from about $15,000 this year to $95,000 in 2013.

“It’s my opinion that the county has done more than its fair share,” Male said. “I’m fine with funding it at the base of $15,000 like we had in the past. But I think a better funding stream, the city gets revenue from an alcohol tax, and it seems there would be a nice correlation between a homeless shelter and an alcohol tax.”

Thellman, however, said she supports the increase in funding.

“My sense is that the Lawrence Community Shelter serves a growing population of folks who have multiple needs,” she said. “It’s not just overnight bedding. A lot of times they need counseling, job training and help finding housing.”

If re-elected, Thellman said she wants to continue the work started in her first term.

“I certainly want to continue to be an active participant in helping our community find ways to bring new jobs in, a wide variety of jobs, keep building our bioscience industry,” she said.

Male said if he’s elected, “Hopefully we’ll have some new employers, more primary jobs, a streamlined planning process and a business-friendly environment.”

Candidate profile

Douglas County Commissioner Nancy Thellman.

Douglas County Commissioner Nancy Thellman.

Nancy Thellman-D

Occupation: Douglas County commissioner

Married: Husband, Scott

Children: Three

Religion: Member, First Presbyterian Church, Lawrence

Education: Bachelor of Science in nursing, Kansas University (1980), Master of Divinity, Vanderbilt University (1990)

Experience: Former associate pastor, First Presbyterian Church; former interim associate pastor, Plymouth Congregational Church

Quote: “For me, it’s about all kinds of jobs. Not just factory, but the high-tech bioscience jobs, agricultural jobs and tourism-related employment.”

Douglas County Commission District 2 candidate Frank Male

Douglas County Commission District 2 candidate Frank Male

Frank Male-R

Age: 50

Occupation: Co-owner, Lawrence Landscape

Married: Wife, Kallie

Children: Four

Religion: Member, St. John’s Catholic Church, Lawrence

Education: Bachelor of Science in agriculture, Kansas State University (1985)

Experience: Board member, Lawrence Chamber of Commerce (2009-2012), served six years on the Lawrence-Douglas County Planning Commission

Quote: “The idea (behind ‘primary jobs’) is that something is made or done in Douglas County that is sold somewhere else.”

Comments

Travis Oliver 2 years, 1 month ago

Frank Male is the best candidate for Douglas County.

Homey 2 years, 1 month ago

I agree. Frank has run a successful business, actually created jobs and served the community. He has earned my vote.

chootspa 2 years, 1 month ago

I don't think either one of them has the background I'd prefer to see, but I like Thellman's broader philosophy on economic growth more than Male's more narrow definition.

jniebaum 2 years, 1 month ago

Nancy has done a great job for us and will continue to do so. She has really earned our support.

cowboy 2 years, 1 month ago

Im a dem but goin with Male on this one

bmoody51 2 years, 1 month ago

I've known Frank for many years and have found him to be an extremely good person. I agree with him in that not every person is designed to be a scientist or computer person. We should concentrate more on offering opportunities for our youth in the manufacturing and trades fields of employment. Not everyone is college material. Additionally, he has guided his business through these tough economic times when many others have failed. My vote will be for Frank!

xyz 2 years, 1 month ago

From the article: Male has also been critical of increased spending by the county for certain social services, including the Lawrence Community Shelter. “It’s my opinion that the county has done more than its fair share,” Male said. “I’m fine with funding it at the base of $15,000 like we had in the past. But I think a better funding stream, the city gets revenue from an alcohol tax, and it seems there would be a nice correlation between a homeless shelter and an alcohol tax.”

And how exactly does the challenger plan to convince the City to allocate more alcohol taxes to the Shelter?  Has the challenger done any research to know that the City has an appointed Social Services Funding Advisory Board that reviews agency requests for those funds and then makes recommendations to the City Commission?  Does the challenger know that the City's 2012 budget allocates $565,161 of City-collected alcohol tax funds to 9 agencies, one of which is the Shelter?

Since the challenger lives in Eudora, it would be important for him to know something about Lawrence City government policies and processes and how City and County elected commissioners interact.

This is just ONE example of the challenger's lack of knowledge of how government works, both at the city level AND the county level.

Re-elect County Commissioner Nancy Thellman!!!

keng1999 2 years, 1 month ago

Commissioner Nancy Thellman always approaches issues facing the county with a balanced approach, whether they be economic development, social services, or the day-to-day operations we depend on. She takes a long term view without shortchanging our short term needs and responsibilities. We are lucky to have someone with these kinds of abilities. Nancy should be returned to the Commission for a second term!

cowboy 2 years, 1 month ago

Thellman is of the mindset that she can tell people how they can use their property. I'll call her a restricter. This is popular in Lawrence and Douglas County but seems to limit individual property rights.

Secondly this whole heritage site crap is nothing other than someones personal hobby . This project has a life of its own eating up valuable taxpayer dollars. Call me insensitive to history , yep true , this is a boondoggle.

insidR 2 years, 1 month ago

Thellman approaches development issues intelligently. She took a stand against industrial zoning in two areas for very good reasons. The airport business park proposal put forward by Jes Santaularia (whose Bella Sera development went under) would have significantly worsened the problems of flooding faced by North Lawrence and have required millions in infrastructure costs to be shouldered by the taxpayers. Cowboy, she saved you and me a ton of money by opposing this. She opposed an island annexation proposal along I-70 because the process was sketchy all along and was bound to end up in court for years (it has). She supported a similar project just down the road, done right, and we now have the Berry Plastics warehouse there. It's easy to say yes to every development proposal as I'm sure Frank Male will. But I'm glad somebody is there who looks at the big picture of what the results would mean for the taxpayers and the whole community.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.