Advertisement

Archive for Tuesday, October 23, 2012

GOP, unaffiliated voter registration up in Kansas

October 23, 2012

Advertisement

— The ranks of Republican and unaffiliated voters are growing in Kansas, while the number of registered Democrats has fallen dramatically since 2008, according to the secretary of state's office.

Republicans hold all statewide elected offices, both U.S. Senate seats and all four U.S. House seats, as well as majorities of both houses of the Kansas Legislature.

There are now 439,639 Democrats registered in the state, a drop of more than 45,000 since the 2008 election. Democrats make up just over 25 percent of the state's registered voters.

State Democratic Party leaders recognize the predicament they face in drawing supporters and getting their candidates elected.

"It's troubling to see we are losing Democrats," said Joan Wagnon, chairwoman of the Kansas Democratic Party. "As far as I'm concerned, the bottom line is who votes Democratic in November."

Republican registrations increased by over 11,000 to 782,161 people — that's nearly 45 percent of the state's voter totals. Unaffiliated registrations reached 508,204, an increase of more than 25,000 since 2008. Unaffiliated voters now make up 29 percent of the state's voters. The Topeka Capital-Journal reports (http://bit.ly/PO5BY9 ) that Libertarian registrations also increased by more than 1,000 people to 10,828 members.

Amanda Adkins, chairwoman of the Kansas Republican Party, said the move to increase GOP registration figures has been building for the past four years.

"We never stopped growing and improving the data-driven, grassroots campaign system," Adkins said.

Wagnon said the Republican numbers were skewed by the fact that 6,000 Democrats switched party affiliation to vote in the August GOP primary. She said some of those residents switched allegiance so they could vote in Kansas Senate races between moderate incumbents and conservative challengers.

The Kansas Republican Party requires primary voters to register with the party to participate in the election, while Democrats allow people registered with other parties or unaffiliated to vote in the primary without changing party affiliation.

"That is a huge problem for us," Wagnon said, "with the open versus closed primary."

Democrats are expected to discuss changing the primary requirements during a meeting in February, opting either to keep the present system or switch to the GOP approach.

Wagnon said the growth in unaffiliated voters might indicate that younger Kansas residents prefer to avoid political labels. Barker said he hadn't looked at the issue nor considered the reasons for a rise in unaffiliated registrations.

Comments

Thomas Bryce 2 years, 1 month ago

I am not surprised at the lower numbers of Democrats registered. Some of them strategically registered as Republicans so they could vote in the Primaries. Being registered as a Republican doesn't mean that vote is automatically Republican in the General elections. Being a Registered Democrat counts for little in Kansas anymore. When one party has control of everything it is no longer a democracy.

jhawkinsf 2 years, 1 month ago

"When one party has control of everything it is no longer a democracy". Yet read the comments of many in this forum, and you must come to the conclusion that they are die hard Democrats who want Democrats to be in control of all three branches of government, at every level. Would you suggest they are anti-democracy?

Thomas Bryce 2 years, 1 month ago

I think it would be completely wrong for EITHER party to have COMPLETE control. There are checks and balances that were put in place by our forefathers to keep that from happening. Those checks and balances are being chipped away by those in BOTH parties. I only have MY vote and I will use it to vote for whom ever I feel will Restore Balance to this Society. And to answer your question, Yes. Democracy, by definition is government of the people, ALL of them. Having one party control every aspect of government usually only benefits those of the party in control. That is not Democracy. There are some -isms that are more appropriate here for what to call a One Party Rule.

Liberty275 2 years, 1 month ago

They still might. Lets not give up on the dream!

Thomas Bryce 2 years, 1 month ago

If the The Democratic Voters and The Unaffiliated Voters got together, The Republicans here in Kansas could lose. Not a likely scenario due to the divided nature of our Society, But possible.The numbers are there. Is the Will of the Voter there? Apathy is The Enemy.

Thomas Bryce 2 years, 1 month ago

Democrats + Unaffiliated= about 54%. Republicans=45% Hmmm! if we take away Democrats that registered as Republican for "strategic" purposes. and add the Moderate Republicans the Brownback admin. has pissed off, it starts getting more plausible.

2 years, 1 month ago

"Barker said he hadn't looked at the issue nor considered the reasons for a rise in unaffiliated registrations."

Who the heck is Barker? That dude who beat the spit out of Happy Gilmore?

kusp8 2 years, 1 month ago

I thought I'd missed who Barker was when I was skimming through this, so I searched for Barker and didn't find anything but your comment and that quote. Hey LJWORLD LEARN HOW TO PARAPHRASE AP ARTICLES!!

CLARKKENT 2 years, 1 month ago

D-Thomas

You hit the nail on the head, in this state to vote primarys, YOUSE GOTTA BE REPUBLICAN.

tomatogrower 2 years, 1 month ago

That's because there are a lot of Democrats like me who switched parties during the primaries to vote for moderate candidates and forgot to switch back.

jhawkinsf 2 years, 1 month ago

It's not about voting for winners and losers. It's about voting your conscience.

moonflower 2 years, 1 month ago

I wouldn't trust the Sec of State as far as I could throw him, I simply don't trust that they won't challenge any dem voter, so my ballot says independent, my donations and votes say democrat

tolawdjk 2 years, 1 month ago

Sadly this has too much truth to it. There have been numerous problems with registrations being dumped across the country because the person carrying the forms saw things differently.

Thomas Bryce 2 years, 1 month ago

"Sometimes Democracy can be its own Undoing". I am sure I heard this some where before. Please give credit where it is due if any one knows the origin.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.