Archive for Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Judge orders environmental review in Sunflower Electric’s proposed coal-burning power plant

January 31, 2012


— Environmentalists on Tuesday cheered a court ruling that the proposed 895 megawatt coal-burning power plant in southwest Kansas cannot be built until there is a thorough environmental review.

Related document

Court decision in Sunflower Electric case ( .PDF )

“From a public health and environmental perspective, coal-fired power is the most expensive option available,” said Scott Allegrucci of Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign. “We are confident that once the environmental impacts of this plant are considered in light of alternatives, the project's impacts will be unacceptable and it will be rejected.”

The decision was handed down by U.S. District Court Judge Emmett Sullivan in Washington D.C. in the latest turn of events affecting the Sunflower Electric Power Corp.'s project near Holcomb.

Sullivan's decision followed up a ruling from March 2011 that said the Rural Utilities Service, which was financially supporting the Sunflower project, failed to consider environmental impacts of the plant.

Sullivan has ordered that the RUS shall not take any actions in connection to the project until an environmental impact statement is complete.

Sunflower spokeswoman Cindy Hertel said the company was analyzing the decision.


deec 2 years, 2 months ago

That's wonderful news. Maybe the Aquifer can last a few more decades after all.


Ron Holzwarth 2 years, 2 months ago

After years of delays and legal debates, there is yet another delay in expanding the coal fired electric power plant in southwest Kansas.

Meanwhile on the other side of the earth, China is constructing and putting online a new coal fired power plant every week.

And meanwhile in the living room, Mom is flipping the light switch and expecting the lights to turn on.


Commenting has been disabled for this item.