Advertisement

Archive for Friday, January 6, 2012

Town Talk: Lawrence home building totals hit historic low in 2011; city inks deal to add Ripple Glass containers across town; Lawrence Freenet operator on expansion path

January 6, 2012

Advertisement

Subscribe to the Town Talk email edition

Subscribe to the email edition of Town Talk and we'll deliver you the latest city news and notes every weekday at noon.

News and notes from around town:

• It is like Cal Ripken Jr. sitting out a baseball game. It is like Allen Fieldhouse not being sold out for a men’s basketball game. It is like the Missouri Tigers winning a sportsmanship award.

The point is, the streak is over. Since at least 1956 — as long as the city has been keeping records — builders have started at least 100 new single-family homes per year in Lawrence. But 2011 is the year that the housing bubble popped that remaining piece of pride for the Lawrence building industry.

The city issued 95 permits for new single-family homes in 2011. The city’s previous low was 102 units in 2008 and that was followed by 110 units in 2009. In other words, three of the worst years on record for the city’s home building industry have happened in the last four years.

The city’s high-water mark was 486 single-family homes in 1994. From 1991 to 2004, the city issued at least 300 single-family building permits per year. Even during the 1980s, when mortgage rates were routinely in the double digits, Lawrence only hit a low of 119 homes.

But there were some signs of life in the building industry in 2011. Builders started 355 apartment units in the city, which is the most since 2008. The city also had some large dollar commercial projects get started last year. The total value of all private projects started in 2011 checked in at $107.7 million ($7 million worth of publicly-funded projects also were started.) The $107 million mark also is the highest since 2008.

Here’s a look at the 10 largest projects that began work in 2011:

  1. Hunter’s Ridge Apartments near Sixth and Stoneridge, $28.5 million;
  2. Bowersock Power Plant North Kaw Plant, $11.3 million
  3. Poehler Building Renovation, 619 E. Eighth St., $4.4 million
  4. Dillon’s, 1740 Mass., $3.8 million
  5. Comfort Inn & Suites, 150 Iowa, $3.3 million
  6. Waste Water Treatment Plant improvements, 1408 E. Eighth St., $3.1 million
  7. LMH Food and Nutrition Services renovation, 325 Maine, $2.6 million
  8. Crossgate Casitas apartments, 2451 Crossgate Drive $2.1 million
  9. Hy-Vee renovation, 3405 Clinton Parkway, $2.0 million
  10. Natural Grocers, 1301 W. 23rd St., $1.5 million.

• Attention all beer drinkers. (Yeah, wake that guy up who is sleeping in the bathtub.) There’s a bit of a glass bottle recycling issue in Lawrence right now. If you remember, the city and the owner of the 12th and Haskell Recycling Center are in a land use dispute. As part of that dispute, the owner of the 12th and Haskell center has stopped taking all sorts of consumer recyclables, such as glass. That basically leaves the Wal-Mart Recycling Center as the main place to drop off glass bottles. The city has been getting reports that the Wal-Mart center has had some difficulty keeping up with the increased demand, leading overflowing glass bins.

Well, the city doesn’t have an immediate solution, but there is one not too far away. As we’ve previously reported, the city has been working with Kansas City-based Ripple Glass to install several glass recycling bins across the city. I’ve been told that contract has now been signed, and the city is expecting to have four glass recycling bins installed in about six weeks. The city is not yet ready to announce the locations of the bins, but we’ll get that information soon. And yes, unfortunately, the bins will be painted in Ripple’s trademark color of purple.

“I talked to Ripple about the purple, but it was important to them,” said Mayor Aron Cromwell, who has been lobbying for Ripple to start collecting glass in the city.

Under the deal, city crews will empty the bins and take the glass to a central location in Lawrence. Ripple then will transport the glass from Lawrence to a Kansas City plant, where the glass is used to make fiberglass insulation.

In the meantime, perhaps a few beer drinkers could switch to aluminum cans. Where I’m from, it is considered cool to crush ‘em on your forehead. Oh yeah, I was very cool.

• Competition in the Internet service provider market may be heating up in Lawrence. There is of course Knology, the largest player in town. There is AT&T, which is expanding the number of areas it can offer its U-Verse service in the city. And there is Lawrence-based Community Wireless, which operates the not-for-profit Lawrence Freenet service.

At their Tuesday evening meeting, city commissioners will consider approving a pair of agreements that should make it easier for Community Wireless to expand in the city. One agreement gives Community Wireless the ability to use the city’s rights-of-ways for communications equipment. It also allows the company to place wireless antennas and such on certain pieces of city-owned structures, such as water towers, traffic signals and street light poles. In exchange for use of the right-of-way and structures, Community Wireless will pay the city 5 percent of its gross receipts over the 25-year term of the agreement. No estimate, yet, on what that amount may be.

The second agreement will give Community Wireless access to 12 strands of city-owned fiber optic cable that will be installed along 23rd Street. The city is installing the fiber, in part, to connect traffic signals along 23rd Street to a central computer system.

Community Wireless wants access to the fiber optic cables because it can use them to deliver super high-speed Internet access to parts of Lawrence. When Community Wireless presented the plan to city commissioners in May, the company said it could offer 1-Gbps Internet service, which is the same super high-speed Internet service that Google is installing in the Kansas City area.

CWC leaders said the fiber likely would allow them to offer the high-speed service to businesses and apartment complexes along the 23rd Street Corridor, the Daisy Hill area near Kansas University and perhaps along parts of Sixth Street and Iowa Street.

CWC will make a one-time $30,000 payment to the city for use of the fiber, in addition to the previous provision calling for 5 percent of gross revenues to go to the city.

The agreements also call for CWC — which is a for-profit company — to continue offering free Internet service to certain low-income individuals through the not-for-profit Freenet or some other vehicle. Specifically, the agreements say CWC will offer free service to households with a “net income at or below 140 percent of the net income eligible for food assistance as defined and published by the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.” The agreement, though, does provide a couple of outs. It says the “availability of free services for qualifying households is dependent upon the financial resources available to CWC.” But it goes on to say that CWC will “endeavor” to have about 10 percent of its residential customer base comprised of free service households.

City commissioners meet at 6:35 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall.

Comments

toe 2 years, 3 months ago

Only a fool would buy a house these days. Renting makes so much more sense, cheaper, and frees capital for better use. However, if you buy, a basic, small house is much smarter. There are a multitude of 3000 plus square foot empty homes in my neighborhood.

0

observant 2 years, 3 months ago

Wish they would quit referring to Freenet as a non-profit, As soon as they suckered Lawrence into free use of right of way, they immediately turned all operations over to a profit making company. Just try using their "free" service. I'm sick a and tired of their trying to take over any wireless connections I use. I wish I could find a way to permanently block any and all of their SSID's.

0

ybotgus 2 years, 3 months ago

I am seeing a pattern, 1 First shut down local businesses, 2 Bring in big business outsiders, 3 Subsidize their operating expenses with city employees, 4 Then mandate a government program which is unnecessary

I don't know why but term Carpetbagger comes to mind

0

Curtis Lange 2 years, 3 months ago

Woohoo! Excited to start seeing some Ripple Glass containers in town.

0

average 2 years, 3 months ago

U-verse is actually expanding? Not in my 'hood, smack in the middle of town (and, yes, I've called too). Most reports are that they haven't done much U-verse installation anywhere in their national footprint for almost 2 years now. With how cheap, standardized, and inevitable passive-optical network hardware is getting, they aren't wanting to dump more money into huge, power-sucking, dead-end-tech U-verse pedestal boxes every square mile. I have inlaws in a Nebraska town of 100 people on a independent co-op telco who have fiber-to-the-home now.

If they wanted, they could get quite a lot of people away from Knology, especially with the latter's 1999-era DOCSIS 1.0 upload speeds even for the highest tier customers. On the other hand, AT&T gets to milk more people for cheap-to-provide 6/1 DSL lines in this town than in most.

But, if AT&T ever wants a test city for a full FTTH deployment, Lawrence might be the one. Enough people who don't love the local cable provider. Knology doesn't have the sway in local politics that Dolph did to fight competition. And they probably need to do it before the KCK/KCMO Google Fiber experiment looks here for their next expansion phase.

0

pace 2 years, 3 months ago

Great about the Ripple glass drop offs coming. Good end product, good system for collection for glass. I have very little glass, tomato sauces, condiment jars, I do have friends who drink beer and booze, which produces a lot of glass. I would prefer a deposit law for beverage containers, which reduces litter and ups recycling by 80%. But Birp and industry pressures has pretty much made that a lost cause in Kansas. Glass is a very problematic material for curbside collection. adds a lot of costs. Plastic is even more problematic (just use less). I hope this clears the way for city wide curbside collection of paper/cardboards and metals. Good for the city for the Ripple effort. A big thank you to Walmart for their drop off, I don't believe the Walmart collection will be ended if the City goes curbside. Their drop off site is rather small and at times overwhelmed. It serves a lot more people than just in town citizens.

0

consumer1 2 years, 3 months ago

So Aaron Cromwell, wants to close down a local business and throw business to someone from Kansas City, Mo??Ks?? Who elected this person??? He is a progressive in wolf's clothing

0

Betty Bartholomew 2 years, 3 months ago

Is it realistic to always expect a high number of single-family homes to be built in town? There's only so much space that can accommodate residential building, and only so many families moving into those spaces (limited by means and desire). It seems that there would be a point where continually building new homes would lead to houses sitting empty, and beyond that, a saturation point of land availability where the number of homes that even could be built would eventually be 0.

0

Adrienne Sanders 2 years, 3 months ago

Thank goodness for the glass bins. I don't mind too much taking the stuff to Walmart, but it's super frustrating to drive all the way out there and have the bins be full and CLOSED. It'd be even nicer to have something closer to home.

0

consumer1 2 years, 3 months ago

said Mayor Aron Cromwell, who has been lobbying for Ripple to start collecting glass in the city.

should he be lobbiing for a prvate industry???? doesn't that show bias and lack of competition???

0

ilovelucy 2 years, 3 months ago

Purple is the color of royalty.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.