Archive for Sunday, January 1, 2012

Romney’s chief Iowa rivals press electability

January 1, 2012


— With time running short, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum and other Republican presidential contenders insisted they could beat President Barack Obama as they worked to persuade undecided Iowa Republicans aching to win the White House to choose them over chief rival Mitt Romney.

“I’m the candidate that actually was able to win in states, as a conservative, in getting Democrats and independents to vote for us,” Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator who is surging in the race and is a favorite among cultural conservatives, said in an interview on CNN. “Mitt Romney has no track history of doing that.”

Paul, a libertarian-leaning Texas congressman who Romney has said is outside the GOP mainstream, countered the suggestion that he’s a fringe candidate. In an interview with ABC from his home state, where he was spending the weekend, Paul insisted: “I’m electable. I’ve been elected 12 times in Texas, when people get to know me.”

With Romney in a position of strength in Iowa, both Santorum and Paul went directly at the former Massachusetts governor’s chief argument — that he is the most electable Republican in a head-to-head matchup against Obama next fall. They hope they can sway the roughly half of likely caucus-goers who say they are undecided or willing to change their minds two days before the leadoff presidential caucuses.

A Des Moines Register poll released Saturday showed Romney and Paul locked in a close race, with Santorum rising swiftly to challenge them. Nearly half of likely Iowa caucus-goers view Romney as the Republican most likely to win the general election. He was far ahead of Santorum and Paul, who was viewed as the least likely to win.

Those two are fighting against the notion in GOP circles that their bases of support are narrow and neither would be able to cobble together the diverse voting coalition necessary to beat Obama in November. Paul attracts legions of backers who put states’ rights above much else, while Santorum — an anti-abortion crusader — is popular among Christian conservatives who make up the base of the Republican Party.

In contrast, Romney has styled himself as a Republican able to attract a broad spectrum of voters. As polls showed him in strong standing in Iowa in the past week, he has redoubled his effort to portray himself as the business-savvy executive with national appeal who is best able to defeat Obama on the campaign’s most pressing issue, the economy.

Although the race remains fluid, it appeared that Romney’s carefully crafted plan to avoid underperforming in Iowa, where he campaigned little until last week, may be working, given a divided GOP electorate torn between several more conservative candidates and Paul’s appeal to libertarians.

The issue of what type of candidate to choose cuts to the heart of why the Iowa race is so volatile; an NBC/Marist poll last week showed nearly even percentages of Iowa caucus-goers want a candidate who shares their values as want a candidate who can beat Obama.

“The first thing you see when you talk to any Iowa Republican is that desire to beat Barack Obama,” Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn said.

Mindful of that, both Romney and Santorum canvassed the state Sunday to make the electability case — and their schedules illuminated their late-game strategies for rallying their backers to the caucuses.


just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 5 years ago

In an interview with ABC from his home state, where he was spending the weekend, Paul insisted: “I’m electable. I’ve been elected 12 times in Texas, when people get to know me.”

We'd all like to know you better, Ron. You can start by telling us the full story behind those racist newsletters you put out.

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 5 years ago

"“I’m the candidate that actually was able to win in states, as a conservative, in getting Democrats and independents to vote for us,” Santorum,"

Why do so many candidates refer to themselves in the royal "we?"

But exactly what is Santorum talking about here? Has he ever won an election anywhere outside Pennsylvania? (and he lost his last one there.)

cato_the_elder 5 years ago

An interesting story, given the fact that Romney presently appears to be the only electable candidate.

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 5 years ago

Despite his claim that corporations are people, too, it's not clear that he even has the corporate vote wrapped up.

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 5 years ago

After all, corporations vote with their money, not at the polls, and Obama leads in that polling-- and with the Citizens United ruling, the Supreme Court affirmed that US elections are determined by money, not votes by actual people at the polls.

cato_the_elder 5 years ago

He'll never have it "wrapped up." Plenty of business people, including numerous "Wall Street" executives like Corzine, are notoriously liberal Democrats.

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 5 years ago

Wall Street doesn't think in terms of liberal or conservative-- all they care about is keeping the casino humming, no matter what it costs everyone else.

cato_the_elder 5 years ago

Bozo, how many Wall Street liberals do you know? I have a number of misguided liberal friends who ply their trade there, invariably failing to understand that supporting and voting for liberal Democrats is not in their long-term best interest. I've often thought of writing a book called "What's the Matter with Wall Street," describing how many Wall Street executives inexplicably fail to act in their own best interest by supporting liberal Democrats.

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 5 years ago

You couldn't be more wrong. Clinton, and now Obama, have proven to be extremely loyal to their (very generous) friends on Wall Street. And there are plenty of liberal friends of Wall Street in Congress, as well.

Sadly, although crony capitalism and government corruption are specialties of Republicans, Democrats aren't shy in that department, either.

cato_the_elder 5 years ago

"Crony green environmental wacko capitalism" is a relatively new species of crony capitalism that is owned entirely by liberal Democrats.

coloradoan 5 years ago

So do you classify the majority of people growing the corn that goes into subsidized ethanol as "liberal Democrats"? Neither do I.

Fred Whitehead Jr. 5 years ago

I am pretty bummed out about all the midia hype about inconsequential meetings of Iowa residents. to indicate what the corn and swine set feel about a goofy and disjointed group of individuals all who claim that they are God's annointed and will do their best to establish a "moral" and "conservative" thocracy in the United States.. The 24 hour news-manufacturing networks have created a bottomless pit need for grist for their ranting talking heads and "experts" quoting all sorts of ragged and unspecified poll statistics. It is not very likely that any one of them will defeat the current president who is doing as bood a job as anyone could given the blinding hatred and resistance whipped up by the radical right and radio talk personalities who have a lot of junk to sell to their frothing admirers.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.