Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Kansas Senate approves congressional map that consolidates Lawrence in 2nd, puts Manhattan in 1st

February 8, 2012

Advertisement

— The Kansas Senate on Wednesday approved a bipartisan congressional redistricting plan that puts all of Lawrence in the 2nd U.S. House District.

The measure passed 23-17 and now goes to the House, where it is expected to face opposition because it moves Manhattan, which is now in the 2nd District, into the 1st. Fifteen Republicans and eight Democrats voted for the plan, and 17 Republicans voted against it.

Today, east Lawrence is in the 3rd District and west Lawrence is in the 2nd.

Legislators have to redraw district boundaries to accommodate for population shifts that have occurred over the past 10 years.

The vast 1st District, which covers western and much of central Kansas, lost population and needs about 58,000 people to reach the ideal district size.

Most of the debate Wednesday dealt with how to add population to the 1st. A Senate committee approved a plan putting Manhattan in the 1st.

But the Kansas Republican Party, Kansas Chamber of Commerce and key Republican officials oppose that move. During debate in the Senate, all of Gov. Sam Brownback’s top staff members were in the chamber monitoring the action.

Sen. Mike Peterson, R-Wichita, proposed a map that would have kept Manhattan in the 2nd, but it would have split Topeka between the 2nd and 1st Districts.

Sen. Susan Wagle, R-Wichita, said the proposal seemed like a good fit because the Topeka school district had a lot of at-risk students, the same as in western Kansas.

But Sen. Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka, said the proposal needlessly split a community of interest just as legislators had done 10 years ago to Lawrence. “There is no greater community of interest than a city of the first class,” Hensley said. Peterson’s proposal failed, 17-22.

Earlier, Sen. Roger Reitz, R-Manhattan, proposed a map that would have kept Manhattan in the 2nd and extended the 1st into the top northern tier of counties to the Kansas-Missouri line. But that failed, too.

Reitz said Manhattan wanted to stay in the 2nd District because it is represented by U.S. Rep. Lynn Jenkins, R-Topeka. She has a position on the Appropriations Committee and that is crucial to funding the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility and Fort Riley, he said.

But as the debate wound down, Sen. Ralph Ostmeyer, R-Grinnell, said U.S. Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Fowler, who represents the 1st, would do a good job representing the interests of Manhattan.

Comments

yourworstnightmare 2 years, 2 months ago

This is a good district map. It makes sense regionally and has very little gerrymandering.

Better start campaigning, Lynn.

0

Michael LoBurgio 2 years, 2 months ago

U.S. Rep. Lynn Jenkins, R-Topeka, U.S. Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Fowler and the rest of the ks. washington delegation all voted to END medicare, social security and medicaid.

Impacts of the Republican Medicare Plan In Kansas’s 2nd Congressional District http://housedocs.house.gov/energycommerce/medicare_2011/KS2.Jenkins.pdf

0

Stain 2 years, 2 months ago

10 states just got waivers from the federal government on No Child Left Behind.

Why isn't Kansas one of them?

0

hammerhawk 2 years, 2 months ago

This is absolutely criminal. Gerrymandering at its worst. Kansas is following Texas in doing everything possible to reduce the voting impact of citizens and patriots who believe in making certain that the bounties of our great country are shared by all. In plain talk, that means the republicans in power in Kansas are grabbing for more power by watering down the votes of blacks, Hispanics and others who oppose cutting school budgets, keeping poorer youth from getting food stamps, etc., etc. We are definitely going backward in Kansas.

0

Bob_Keeshan 2 years, 2 months ago

Sure is interesting to see how much Manhattan and K-State despise western Kansas.

You would think the folks out there who have so much "purple pride" would question why their leaders have so many negative things to say about western Kansas. From reading the comments from Manhattan, you would think they were being sent to permanent exile, surrounded by uneducated and uninformed heathens.

Nice to see their true colors finally showing.

0

LJ Whirled 2 years, 2 months ago

This is a real question ... Do they count all the illegals out West? ... because there are a large number, and it makes a big difference, one way or the other. I cannot recall reading if illegals are counted.for apportionment.

0

Blue_Stem 2 years, 2 months ago

Huelskamp does not stand for what the people of Manhattan do. He is so far right and a Tea Partier.

0

Steve Jacob 2 years, 2 months ago

Manhattan should love the move, being the largest and richest city in a congressional district has to give much more attention then in the past.

0

jehovah_bob 2 years, 2 months ago

I didn't even know you could associate Manhattan with the 1st anything.

0

Jeanne Cunningham 2 years, 2 months ago

I would truly appreciate this more if a map could be included.

0

jackpot 2 years, 2 months ago

"Today, east Lawrence is in the 3rd district and west Lawrence is in the 2nd." Most of west Lawrence is in the 2nd, I'm in west Lawrence and in the 3rd.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.