Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Court knowledge is lacking

August 29, 2012

Advertisement

Last week a popular legal blog, Findlaw.com, released the results of a survey it had done designed to test the average American’s knowledge of the U.S. Supreme Court. Those findings were both remarkable and depressing. Findlaw.com took a random survey by telephone of 1,000 people about the Supreme Court. They discovered that the vast majority of Americans were unable to name the justices. Chief Justice Roberts was best known; 20 percent of the people surveyed knew his name. Justices Scalia and Thomas were known to 16 percent of those called; Justice Breyer was known to only 3 percent and the recognition percentage of the other justices fell in between.

The U.S. Supreme Court plays a powerful role — some say too powerful — and the decisions of the justices affect virtually every aspect of our daily lives. We are in the midst of a presidential election in which one of the most important issues is the Affordable Care Act and last spring’s Supreme Court decision on the legality of the act.  The election process itself has been massively influenced by an earlier Supreme Court decision on campaign finance: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

Perhaps, the most significant social issue in American politics today, abortion, centers on the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. There are few areas in American society and politics that have not been influenced by the U.S. Supreme Court. The nine justices of the Supreme Court are, perhaps, the most powerful men and women in American government and, certainly, are the most powerful non-elected American officials, and yet, according to the Findlaw.com survey, most Americans don’t even know their names. If Americans cannot name the justices of the Supreme Court, one is forced to ask what else they don’t know about the court.

To my mind this is ultimately an issue of insufficient education. When I was in school in New York in the 1950s and 1960s, every student was required to study what was then called “civics” both in elementary school and in high school. We studied the presidency, Congress and the Supreme Court.  We were required to learn the names not only of the presidents but also the Supreme Court justices. We read the Constitution. In fact, I suspect that my fascination with law, a fascination that ultimately led to my becoming a lawyer and a law professor, began in those civics classes. Every American citizen has an obligation to be informed about our political and legal system. Only in this way can we fully and appropriately exercise our political rights. An uninformed citizenry cannot vote intelligently or even participate effectively in political discourse. The whole purpose of the First Amendment is to foster the free flow of information so that citizens can be fully informed.

The results of the Findlaw.com survey are shocking and depressing. To me they signal that we are not teaching our children adequately about the most important aspects of our national governance. Of course, this survey is not the first to point out how little the average American knows about his or her government, but the very fact that this public ignorance continues today is shocking in itself. I think that every teacher and educational administrator should look at their school curricula to see how they can better educate their students about our government. I think that every legislator should ask whether our educational standards are tough enough in these areas. I think that every parent should be sure that their children are learning the basic facts of American government. Let us hope that the next survey done by Findlaw.com or another group interested in Americans’ knowledge of government and law will show better results.

Mike Hoeflich, a distinguished professor in the Kansas University School of Law, writes a regular column for the Journal-World.

Comments

voevoda 1 year, 7 months ago

Dr. Hoeflich has framed the problem this way: too many citizens don't know the identities of Supreme Court justices, much less their stances of the pressing issues of our day. But I don't think that he has the problem or the cause right. The problem isn't that schoolchildren aren't taught about the Supreme Court and aren't required to learn the names of the justices. Most likely, all adults learned this as children; I certainly did. But time passes; the membership of the Supreme Court changes; and the roster of justices we learned in 5th grade or 9th grade doesn't match the membership 20, 30, 40, or 50 years later. Many people are not such political junkies that it's a high priority to be able to rattle off all the names of the members of the Supreme Court in case they face a pop quiz. More important questions would be these: How many of the respondents are able to explain cogently what would be at stake if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade? How many can identify the issues in the Court's rulings concerning corporations qualifying as legal individuals or concerning campaign funding or the Affordable Care Act? What opinions have members of Congress expressed when the nominations of prospective Supreme Court justices have been discussed?

1

donttreadonme 1 year, 7 months ago

True. The main reason to know Clarence Thomas' name is to to identify another slacker dependent on the government teat.

2

Tony Kisner 1 year, 7 months ago

Once I know their names can I – vote them out? Or Lobby them? They are what they are, a permanent placement to the bench with what appears to be almost unlimited power.

0

Mike Ford 1 year, 7 months ago

roberts, scalia, and thomas, devotees of rehnquist in eroding tribal rights... all I need to know.....

1

Liberty_One 1 year, 7 months ago

I disagree. It is not about insufficient education but rational ignorance. People choose to spend their limited time on other activities than keeping up with the latest issues facing the Court or the makeup of the Court. Studying the Court's latest decision and the ramifications of it may be interesting to political junkies like us, but for most people it is dull and unhelpful information. In addition, there is so little most individuals can do about it that it is not worth their time. Why spend time learning the names of the Justices when I would rather be learning the names of my son's friends?

Learning the Justices's names won't help you in you day-to-day life very much at all. That's why the State can get away with so much of what it does--as long as it only causes a little harm not enough will notice to do anything about it.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.