Advertisement

Archive for Tuesday, November 29, 2011

After exoneration, Topeka case reopened to find DNA match for real rapist

Joe Jones was convicted of a rape he didn't commit. He was exonerated through DNA evidence in 1992.

Joe Jones was convicted of a rape he didn't commit. He was exonerated through DNA evidence in 1992.

November 29, 2011

Advertisement

A detective with the Topeka Police Department’s Special Victim’s Unit said he’s been in contact with a California scientist who might hold the clue to a decades-old unsolved rape case.

Exonerated, but still not free

Joe Jones was the first person in the state to be exonerated of a crime by DNA evidence, but life after prison has been difficult.

Joe Jones sits in his small sparse apartment just blocks from the capital building in Topeka. Jones is trying to get his life together these days after spending nearly eight years in prison for a rape but was cleared through DNA evidence.

Nearly 20 years after winning an exoneration, he's still trying to reclaim a life derailed by prison and drugs, while the victim remains convinced of his guilt. More

“We will proceed with it full force,” said Detective Adam Arensdorf, who’s been assigned to follow up on DNA evidence, stored in a cooler since 1992, that cleared Topeka man Joe Jones of a 1985 rape. Arensdorf said the case was reopened following a Lawrence Journal-World investigation that identified the existence of the DNA as part of a special feature on Jones’ case.

Jones was exonerated by the DNA in 1992, but no one else was ever arrested for the crime.

The DNA might still be testable and could potentially identify the real rapist once it’s entered in a national DNA database, which didn’t exist in 1992, Arensdorf said.

It’s not yet clear how much DNA evidence is still in the possession of Ed Blake, the scientist who originally tested the evidence and testified at the hearing that freed Jones. Blake tested the original material, froze and kept some remnant extract, then sent the original material, which hasn’t been located, back to the Topeka Police. Blake said that he thinks he might have enough of the remnant material to test the DNA and obtain a match using today’s more advanced technology. The 1992 testing excluded Jones as the rapist, but, at the time, limits in the emerging DNA technology could not have positively identified a suspect.

In the coming weeks, Arensdorf said, the department should have updates on how it plans to pursue the case.

Though the five-year statute of limitations for prosecution of rape cases in Kansas has long passed, Kansas law allows for prosecution of rape and murder cases for up to one year after DNA evidence has identified a suspect.

Comments

bolshavik_vw 3 years ago

I hope they are able to find the Person who did this. I am glad the person who they thought was it, was not. Thank Gosh for DNA! And I hope this victim can go on and try to put the pieces behind them, also that they are able to see the real person charged.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.