Advertisement

Archive for Saturday, November 26, 2011

Prosecutor: Reagan, Bush not criminally liable

November 26, 2011

Advertisement

— One of the prosecutors who investigated the Iran-Contra affair concluded two decades ago that neither Ronald Reagan nor George H.W. Bush was criminally liable in the scandal that tarnished the presidencies of both men, according to reports made public Friday.

Associate independent counsel Christian Mixter reached that conclusion in 1991 even though he found that President Reagan was briefed in advance about every weapons shipment sold to Iran in the arms-for-hostages deals in 1985-86. In a separate report on Bush, Mixter wrote that the then-vice president was chairman of a committee that recommended mining the harbors of Nicaragua in 1983.

Mixter’s reports were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request from the National Security Archive, a nonprofit research group, which released them on the 25th anniversary of the Iran-Contra scandal. At a Nov. 25, 1986, White House news conference, Reagan and then-Attorney General Edwin Meese disclosed that money from the arms sales to Iran had been diverted to the Contra guerrillas fighting the leftist government of Nicaragua after Congress had cut off military aid to the rebels.

Mixter concluded it would be difficult to prosecute Reagan for violating the Arms Export Control Act mandating congressional notification of arms transfers through a third country — Israel in the case of the Reagan White House’s secret arms sales to Iran in 1985. The reason, said Mixter, was that Meese had told Reagan the National Security Act could be invoked to supersede the export control act.

Mixter’s March 1991 reports to his boss, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh, and his team of prosecutors noted that they were actively investigating Bush, who by then had become president.

“As we have discussed,” Mixter wrote to Walsh and the other prosecutors, “there is an outstanding area of investigation that could conceivably lead to wholly new evidence regarding Mr. Bush’s role in Iran-Contra.” The topic concerned possible knowledge by Bush of secret military support for the Contras, including the recommendation to mine the Nicaraguan harbors.

A year after Mixter wrote his reports, Walsh obtained a grand jury indictment charging former Reagan administration Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger with concealing his detailed notes of the controversy from investigators.

Bush pardoned Weinberger and five other Iran-Contra figures shortly before the former defense secretary was to go on trial in a case in which Bush could well have been summoned as a witness either by prosecutors or defense attorneys.

In a final report by prosecutors released in 1994 more than a year following Bush’s pardons, Walsh stated that Reagan acquiesced in a cover-up that had been spearheaded by Meese and carried out at the top levels of the Reagan administration. The report was immediately denounced by Reagan, Meese, Bush and others. Impeachment of Reagan “certainly should have been considered” by the congressional committees investigating the Iran-Contra affair, Walsh told a news conference at the time.

Mixter’s reports on Reagan and Bush reflect the absence of evidence demonstrating that Reagan or Bush hid information from investigators. Both men participated in meetings of Reagan and his inner circle in which one or the other covert operations was discussed.

Comments

uncleandyt 2 years, 4 months ago

"One" of the prosecutors... What do the others think? It should bother us all that our Presidents are front-men for war profiteers.Too many of you cheerleaders out there have not been paying attention to the game. You celebrate when your team fumbles, you boo when your team scores.

0

beatrice 2 years, 4 months ago

Oh great. Now Reagan is just going to walk free.

0

Cait McKnelly 2 years, 4 months ago

iran/Contra is marshmallow fluff compared to the Iraq war. It's to the point where Bush Jr. has only a handful of countries he can go to outside the US and not get arrested. Considering what his daddy got away with I guess the Shrub thought he could get away with anything.

0

atiopatioo 2 years, 4 months ago

finally! now I'll get to sleep at night.

@just

Does this mean the rastasfarian at the helm now is going straight?

0

cato_the_elder 2 years, 4 months ago

Lawrence Walsh proved himself to be a bitter partisan hack. The timing of his indictment of Cap Weinberger, which contained many related swipes at George H.W. Bush, only a week before the 1992 presidential election violated Justice Department policy and was, in the words of staunch Democrat Lanny Davis, " bizarre." The indictment against Weinberger was dismissed a few months later as outside of the applicable statute of limitations.

Lawrence Walsh's hack job on Reagan, Weinberger, and George H.W. Bush ranks right up there with Dan Rather's false story about George W. Bush, which cost Rather his job with CBS. Walsh should have lost his.

0

jhawkinsf 2 years, 4 months ago

News Flash: Dr. Mudd demands re-trial.

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 2 years, 4 months ago

If we don't learn from the (war and US law/constitution) criminal behavior of past presidents, we're bound to repeat it.

0

its_just_math 2 years, 4 months ago

Why are we talking about this? What about Eric "Machine Gun" Holder's "Fast & Furious" scandal?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.