Advertisement

Archive for Monday, November 14, 2011

Go!

River City Jules: Tigers turn tail on rivalry

November 14, 2011

Advertisement

There are three things I was positive I would never see in my lifetime: Computers that fit in one’s pocket, telephones that play videos and any other conference voluntarily taking in Missouri. Yet as I watched the news reports on my husband’s iPhone, I realized I was holding all that once seemed impossible in the palm of my hand.

I had always envisioned the oldest college rivalry west of the Mississippi ending with surrounding states surgically extracting Missouri from the map, filling in the space with a giant, manmade sea with sparkling blue water and beachside beverage service.

Any other kind of exit had never crossed my mind. Especially Missouri working its way into the hearts (and pocketbooks) of the Southeastern Conference, which I’m assuming it has by now realized has nothing to do with Florida timeshares and everything to do with more wins for everyone from Alabama to Vanderbilt.

But with this smorgasbord about to hit the SEC comes a parting of ways for Kansas and Missouri.

For over a century, Missouri has been the Capulet to our Montague, the Hatfield to our McCoy, the Quantrill to our Brown. Ending this kind of relationship over money is like selling a family heirloom to pay the cable bill. That antique moose antler chandelier from your great-great-grandma might not be pretty, but it has significance that is lost in the hands of anyone outside the family.

That’s right, Mr. Alden. Without the Kansas rivalry, your school is just like that ugly light fixture waiting out its days in a pawnshop, for Arkansas is no more interested in a “Border Showdown” than Canada is. And Kentucky, like everyone else, could not recall the name of your current basketball coach as of press time and, like everyone else, doesn’t care enough to Google it.

But, my dear Missouri, we, your sparring partner since that time you tried to get us to become a slave state, gave you purpose, as evidenced by your tendency to cheer against us more often than for yourselves. You might be curmudgeons, but you were OUR curmudgeons. And nobody will ever loathe you like we did.

On that note, so long to the century-long banter about our Final Fours and your renamed arenas; farewell to 100 years of friendly wagers, even when they resulted in our family photo of ’07, head-to-toe in Mizzou gear, after a KU loss at Arrowhead. Goodbye neighbors, and good luck in your new home somewhere between the Crimson Tide and Kentucky blue.

And to the innocent children reading this? Do us old-timers a favor and, as you pass down stories from your youth to your grandkids, be sure to tell them about the glory days when fan rivalry meant more than television revenue. When a fictional bird could twist a tiger’s tail, undaunted by an angry crowd chanting, “Rock Chalk, Chickenhawk!” with all of their inferiority-complex-stricken might. When “Sit down, Norm!” rattled the rafters at Allen Fieldhouse each winter.

That one, century-long shining moment, soon forever frozen in time.

Comments

Angel Gillaspie 3 years, 1 month ago

You took the words right out of my mouth and said them in such a nice way. Well done & thank you.

BroadwayTiger 3 years, 1 month ago

Very well written article. However, your point of view is badly skewed in that the MU/KU rivalry will end because of the short sideness of KU's administration and coaching staff. Mizzou's departure has everything to do with the instablity of the Big XII. You know that. You also know that Mizzou desires to continue the rivalry for our kids and grandkids and so on. Please don't pretend that Mizzou is ending the rivalry. It's not fair to the truth.

Finally, KU and MU have won many battles. From your article, it's clear who won the war. Good luck the rest of the way, Kansas. It really doesn't look so good, which may be the reason for such hard feelings on the part of so many wearing the Crimson and Blue.

Lane Signal 3 years, 1 month ago

No. You can't pin the end of the rivalry on KU's administration and coaches. MU are the ones leaving the league. It's not reasonable to expect KU to commit to non conference games year after year. It's not reasonable for MU to leave and expect everyone else to go out of their way to accommodate them.

BroadwayTiger 3 years, 1 month ago

The article points out just how important the rivalry means to everyone and the generations to come, and yet KU now refuses to schedule the game. What a joke.

riverdrifter 3 years, 1 month ago

Missouri is the one that left the rivalry.

"What a joke" is correct.

blindrabbit 3 years, 1 month ago

If we need a Missouri game, schedule Missouri State. They are an up and coming program and would have been much further down the road to respectability except that MU has held them down as a subservient. This has come about because of the way the Missouri schools are controlled; Rolla, Missouri State and UMKC are all controlled by the President of the University of Missouri who is cloistered in Columbia.

BroadwayTiger 3 years, 1 month ago

I hope Kansas schedule games against Missouri State, which will have little trouble proving which team is superior. And Missouri State will beat KU at basketball (see Bucknell, Northern Iowa, Nevada, and that team you lost to last year, VCU) And by not scheduling Mizzou anymore, Kansas University's fight song is ridiculous since the lyrics refer to its rivaly with Mizzou on more than one occaions. Without the rivalry, it's only a matter of time before KU is irrelevant in Kansas City. Fact of the matter is you need Mizzou. So go ahead and complain that the rivalry ends because Kansas isn't gonna schedule the game. Your point, like this article, is based in fiction.

Corey Williams 3 years, 1 month ago

With nationwide recruiting, why do we care how KU is seen in KC? And why is it that the only people arguing that KU needs an MU game are MU fans?

If we need a rivalry, we'll focus more on K state. At least we'll be able to keep it friendly.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.