Fears spur panic on Muslims

March 18, 2011


He races into traffic screaming. “You fools,” he cries, “you’re in danger!”’ Horns are blasting, brakes are screeching, drivers are swerving to avoid the disheveled man running down the road. “Can’t you see?” he howls.

“They’re after you! They’re after all of us! Our wives, our children, everyone! They’re here already!” To understand the paranoiac terror that has gripped much of the nation where Muslims are concerned, it is helpful to recall “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” the 1956 sci-fi movie classic, and in particular, the penultimate scene described above. “Invasion” told the story of a small town doctor’s dawning realization that his fellow citizens were methodically being replaced by soulless alien things that were physically identical.

It was a town where you suddenly found yourself casting sidelong glances at faces you’d known for years, wondering if your friend was really your friend or an alien entity secretly planning your demise. These things looked like us, acted like us, but were fundamentally not us.

That’s a theme, and a fear, that recurs in American history — not just during the Red Scare era in which the movie was released, but also during the First World War, when German-Americans faced suspicion and censure and the Second World War when Japanese-Americans were forced into internment camps.

For that matter, it recalls Salem, Mass., where, in 1692, 150 people were accused and 19 executed for practicing witchcraft. Last week’s hearing, then, into the radicalization of American-Muslims was as predictable as it was regrettable. Make no mistake: after the Fort Hood massacre; the arrest of Jihad Jane, the would-be terrorist from Pennsylvania; and the aborted bombing of Times Square, it is high time government — and, for that matter, media — investigated the phenomenon of radicalization. We need to know how it happens and, more important, how to stop it.

But New York Rep. Peter King, who convened last week’s hearings, is, putting it mildly, a less-than-credible instrument for such critical work. For one thing, there’s the hypocrisy of it: King, a once ardent supporter of the Irish Republican Army, is the living embodiment of the old saw about one man’s terrorist being another’s freedom fighter. Then there is the fact that King has a history of Muslim bashing. He claims, for instance, that 85 percent of mosque leaders in this country are extremists. It is a “statistic” based on nothing.

And he says Muslims refuse to help ferret out extremism in their community although, according to a University of North Carolina study, fully 40 percent of foiled terrorist plots were interrupted with the help of Muslims.

But then, that’s a fact, and what do facts matter here? Very darn little, actually. Rep. King is not driven by facts or, for that matter, by the sort of sober reasoning you’d want on such a portentous question.

Rather, King seems driven, and determined to drive us, by that primitive, unquestioning fear of the secret other, a fear we have already experienced too often in our history. And when it is over, when the fear has passed like fever, when the Japanese come out of the camps to find their homes and businesses gone, when the people accused of communism are found to be innocent after their careers and reputations are trashed, we Americans share guilty, vaguely abashed glances as if to say, What was that? What came over us? The answer: the same thing that has come over us now, a sticky, panicked, paranoia that leaves us looking sidelong at our own people.

You’d think we’d learn, but we never do. Frighten us, and the same thing invariably happens. Absent of evidence, heedless of facts, we go running in panic like the doctor in the movie.

But give him this much credit: At least he knew what he was running from.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is a columnist for the Miami Herald. He chats with readers from noon to 1 p.m. CDT each Wednesday on www.MiamiHerald.com.


Brent Garner 7 years, 3 months ago

Mr. Pitts, you are correct, we must avoid the errors of the past--the Japanese internment being a very good example. However, tell me, what are we to do about those among us who advocate openly and militantly for the aboliion of the Constitution and its replacement with Sharia Law? Over the years, whenever I could, I have conducted an informal and unscientific survey of Muslims I have encountered. In friendly manner I have endeavored to ask if they supported the replacement of the Constitution with Sharia Law. A few have answered no and that is good. What has troubled me is that the majority either refused to answer or answered in the affirmative. What are to do about these who would destroy the very foundation upon which all our liberties are based? What of the surveys that show the majority of mosques in this country, in their Arabic/non-English sermons, advocate the overthrow of the American government and the imposition of Sharia Law and a caliphate? How shall we treat these? Are they not centers of subversion? Are they not sowing the seeds of domestic terrorism? If you doubt, simply look at Dearborn, Michigan where a handful of Christians, engaged in a sidewalk ministry, were arrested and held in jail not because what they said or did was illegal, but because it was offensive to the Muslim majority of that city. If that is not tyranny and the subversion of freedom, please explain what it is?

jafs 7 years, 3 months ago

  1. Freedom of speech means the freedom to speak about things that may upset people.
  2. Many Christians seem to like the idea of replacing the constitution with christian doctrine, including some elected officials - do you advocate the same policy towards them as you do towards Muslims here?

All serious religious believers probably struggle with the differences between their religious beliefs/tenets, and the secular society in which we live.

If there are those who are seriously advocating for the military overthrow of the US government, then they can be arrested and prosecuted for treason, no?

jafs 7 years, 3 months ago

Well, you're right that we're not simply a secular society.

However, we are far from a religious theocracy - and our constitution establishes freedom of religion.

The type and connection of the founders' faiths with the founding of our country and institutions is complex, but it is clear that they didn't intend to found a theocracy.

Muslims who want to establish Sharia law are analogous to Christians who would prefer to see us be a Christian theocracy - that was the main point of my comment.

And, that those folks undoubtedly struggle with the difference between our government, based on the constitution, and their faith, based on the Bible.

jafs 7 years, 3 months ago

"Some" Muslims may want a theocratic government.

Just as "some" Christians want one.

What do you do if/when there's a conflict between your religious beliefs and our constitutional/legal system?

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 7 years, 3 months ago

"If you doubt, simply look at Dearborn, Michigan where a handful of Christians, engaged in a sidewalk ministry, were arrested and held in jail not because what they said or did was illegal, but because it was offensive to the Muslim majority of that city."

I know that this bit of disinformation is floating around many of your favorite sites for dis- and misinformation, but there is nothing factual about the demographics you cite.

Dearborn's population is 30% Arab, and a very high percentage of them are Lebanese Christians-- not Muslims. And there is no Sharia Law in Dearborn.


And while the "Christian ministers" you refer to appear to have been there primarily to confront Muslims, and make it uncomfortable for them to freely practice their religion, it appears that police were infringing on their first amendment rights-- something you'd apparently be very comfortable with as long as it's the first amendment rights of Muslims that are being infringed upon.

Flap Doodle 7 years, 3 months ago

In other news: "Florida Judge Orders Mosque Leaders to Follow Sharia Law" http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/206888.php

Commenting has been disabled for this item.