Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Tennessee couple arrested in Lawrence in connection with the 2009 death of their baby daughter

March 9, 2011, 11:56 a.m. Updated March 9, 2011, 4:25 p.m.

Advertisement

Ryan Lee Robert Davis

Ryan Lee Robert Davis

Larissa Renee Davis

Larissa Renee Davis

Lawrence police detectives early Wednesday arrested a couple wanted in the 2009 death of their young daughter in Tennessee, prosecutors and police said.

According to Douglas County Jail records, officers arrested Ryan Lee Robert Davis, 34, and Larissa Renee Davis, 23, around midnight on warrants out of Sullivan County in Tennessee.

Julie Canter, a Sullivan County assistant district attorney, said a Tennessee grand jury indicted them both Tuesday on charges of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse and aggravated child neglect.

Canter said the two are accused in connection with the death of their daughter, Izabel Davis, who was less than 1 year old and died at a Tennessee hospital Nov. 6, 2009. Sullivan County Sheriff’s officers had been investigating the girl’s death for more than a year.

“The investigation was ongoing, and the charges were not brought until yesterday,” Canter said.

She said prosecutors could not provide additional details about the case.

Sgt. Matt Sarna, a Lawrence police spokesman, said an outside agency Tuesday asked for officers to assist in finding the couple. They were arrested without incident at the Howard Johnson hotel, 2222 W. Sixth St.

Jail records list a North Lawrence address for Ryan Davis, and Larissa Davis as a Lawrence transient. Canter said the couple in the past had resided in Kingsport, Tenn.

Sarna said the Douglas County Sheriff’s office assisted police in helping them locate the couple. Sarna also said the suspects do have ties to the Lawrence area and were not believed to be running from authorities.

Sullivan County Sheriff’s officials contacted the Douglas County Sheriff’s office in February of 2010 and asked for assistance in locating Ryan and Larissa Davis, said Steve Lewis, a Douglas County Sheriff’s spokesman.

Douglas County District Attorney Charles Branson said the couple likely won’t appear before a judge in district court here until Thursday afternoon.

In Douglas County District Court, the couple would have to choose whether to contest or waive their extradition to Tennessee to begin the legal process there.

Comments

TheEyeofUS 3 years, 1 month ago

First off they are both innocent until proven guilty. Secondly, I see the woman’s mug shot on the SECOND page – why not right next to the man’s mug shot on the first page? Talk about double standards in this country, I read someone’s statement earlier about how they “thought the woman was innocent” – doesn’t everybody always!? We don’t know the whole story yet anyway but LJ world is sure quick to show us ONLY the man’s mug shot up front. “Oh, I’m sure the woman is just a victim…bla,bla,bla.” Or she might be one to eat her own off spring as far as we know. So much for “equality”.

0

martyks 3 years, 1 month ago

So why do you want to try this case in the paper? Let's wait to see what the circumstances were. We have no idea, at this point, if one or both of them was involved. Meantime, a few of you who can't wait for the trial before the lynching, rent out "The Oxbow Incident" and cool your jets. As Henry put it, "Hangin's every man's business." Remember Jean Benet? Her parents were found to be totally innocent (and this was after the mother had died.. after years of abuse in the papers and television speculation. Let the legal system have a chance to work here.

0

tomatogrower 3 years, 1 month ago

I had a friend who told me to watch the eyes of child murderers. It's like they have no soul. This man has those eyes. The woman just looks like some stupid bimbo who would follow the jerk.

0

Kontum1972 3 years, 1 month ago

both those people were scary...looking

0

towniejj 3 years, 1 month ago

Why would it take more than a year to investigate this and bring charges? Such a sad story.

0

consumer1 3 years, 1 month ago

I wonder why Phred Phelps doesn't commnent on here?

0

BigPrune 3 years, 1 month ago

I notice a hickey on her neck. Surely they can find some loonie tune feminist ACLU attorney around here to defend them for their "post partum" abortion.

0

blue73harley 3 years, 1 month ago

Just another reason to hope that the Kansas Coalition Against the Death Penalty fails.

0

budtugly 3 years, 1 month ago

Hey dont respond to GR with his ramblings LJW staff will remove your comments, just continue to let him ramble.

0

jackpot 3 years, 1 month ago

When is "February of 2010cq "?

0

smitty 3 years, 1 month ago

gr also made a violent comment to kill LE which was up for a long time framme before I flagged it. The JW did remove the post but failed to reply to the question of whether the JW turns these threats into LE or not......a concern that is escalating with gr and a couple of others.

Why isn't gr banned?

0

oneeye_wilbur 3 years, 1 month ago

Is it possible that they chose Lawrence because of Loring Henderson's venue. Quite a possiblility.

0

Christine Anderson 3 years, 1 month ago

Git a rope! Wait. make that two ropes!

0

chihuahua2 3 years, 1 month ago

Thank u for removing that post from gr it was way out there!!!! THANK U!!!!

0

Ian Legler 3 years, 1 month ago

gr

By legal terms they committed murder. Plain and simple... Your ramblings are not only disturbing but show a complete lack of compassion and sense of humanity.

0

candyapplered 3 years, 1 month ago

Wow, I just can't believe that they'd done something like this. They were my cousin's neighbors and seemed to me like they were a couple of very nice people. We used to bbq in their backyard all the time and just talk about life and work and hanging out. I'm incredibly outraged about this situation and just to know that we let them eat around our kids and our dogs makes my blood curl.

0

gr 3 years, 1 month ago

Well please help me. Tell me what the difference is.

0

gr 3 years, 1 month ago

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.