Archive for Thursday, July 28, 2011

Scientists: It’s not a bird, not a plane; it’s a dino

July 28, 2011


— One of the world’s most famous fossil creatures, widely considered the earliest known bird, is getting a rude present on the 150th birthday of its discovery: A new analysis suggests it isn’t a bird at all.

Chinese scientists are proposing a change to the evolutionary family tree that boots Archaeopteryx off the “bird” branch and onto a closely related branch of birdlike dinosaurs.

Archaeopteryx (ahr-kee-AHP’-teh-rihx) was a crow-sized creature that lived about 150 million years ago. It had wings and feathers, but also quite un-birdlike traits like teeth and a bony tail. Discovered in 1861 in Germany, two years after Charles Darwin published “On the Origin of Species,” it quickly became an icon for evolution and has remained popular since.

The Chinese scientists acknowledge they have only weak evidence to support their proposal, which hinges on including a newly recognized dinosaur.

Other experts say the change could easily be reversed by further discoveries. And while it might shake scientific understanding within the bird lineage, they said, it doesn’t make much difference for some other evolutionary questions.

Archaeopteryx dwells in a section of the family tree that’s been reshuffled repeatedly over the past 15 or 20 years and still remains murky. It contains the small, two-legged dinosaurs that took the first steps toward flight. Fossil discoveries have blurred the distinction between dinosaurlike birds and birdlike dinosaurs, with traits such as feathers and wishbones no longer seen as reliable guides.

“Birds have been so embedded within this group of small dinosaurs … it’s very difficult to tell who is who,” said Lawrence Witmer of Ohio University, who studies early bird evolution but didn’t participate in the new study.

The proposed reclassification of Archaeopteryx wouldn’t change the idea that birds arose from this part of the tree, he said, but it could make scientists reevaluate what they think about evolution within the bird lineage itself.

“Much of what we’ve known about the early evolution of birds has in a sense been filtered through Archaeopteryx,” Witmer said. “Archaeopteryx has been the touchstone. … (Now) the centerpiece for many of those hypotheses may or may not be part of that lineage.”


gr 6 years, 5 months ago

Ok, in summary, the article is saying it's not a bird but a dinosaur. Because, "Chinese scientists are proposing a change to the evolutionary family tree" due to having "only weak evidence to support their proposal, which hinges on including a newly recognized dinosaur".

Question. What is the weak evidence and what is the newly recognized dinosaur?

Isn't one of the questions news articles are supposed to answer is, "why"? Otherwise, it looks like it spent several paragraphs saying there's a problem, there's some new evidence (not said), there's some new dinosaur (not said), it needs to be reclassified for some reason, (not said).

They could have saved space and be briefer by saying, "Someone, somewhere thinks something should be changed for some reason." And less than 120 characters!

Commenting has been disabled for this item.