Advertisement

Archive for Monday, February 21, 2011

Kansas House committee raises questions about KSU construction projects, delays consideration of Regents budget

February 21, 2011

Advertisement

— The House budget-writing committee balked Monday on the proposed higher education budget after several conservatives posed questions about a number of building projects at Kansas State University.

The House Appropriations Committee will return to the higher ed budget Tuesday.

The 10 projects cost approximately $30 million. Most would be financed with private funds or special funds within K-State.

But several members of the House Appropriations Committee questioned whether the state would be required to pay for maintenance of those facilities, or for additional staff in future years.

Among the projects before the committee were a $13 million new Grain Science Center Feed Mill, $5.3 million for an addition to the Large Animal Research Center, and $5.2 million to accelerate construction of an addition to the College of Human Ecology.

K-State would like to start work on all the projects during the current fiscal year, which ends June 30. The committee didn’t get to the next fiscal year budget, which includes $50 million in bonds to improve Snyder Family Stadium.

All of the proposed projects had been reviewed by the Kansas Board of Regents, but apparently were added to the budget process after the board submitted its budget requests to Gov. Sam Brownback, according to Appropriations Committee staff.

“I’d like clarification from the governor’s office on this,” said Appropriations Chair Marc Rhoades, R-Newton.

There were no capital improvement projects from Kansas University in the budget report.

Comments

sciencegeek 3 years, 10 months ago

For the record, Planned Parenthood provides many services other than abortion; many of the clinics don't perform them abortions at all. What they DO provide is assistance to women about health issues, information on methods of birth control, basic medical testing, etc. Unfortunately, many of the clients they serve are not wealthy, hence of little value to the holier-than-thou conservatives who run the anti-abortion movement.

Then again, there are some of that group who feel that any form of birth control is a form of abortion, since it prevents the pre-conceived. Following that argument, abstinence counts as abortion, too, doesn't it?

The only thing they have less of than logic is compassion. Judgmental hypocrites, all.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.