Archive for Thursday, April 7, 2011

Progress, but no deal to avert shutdown

April 7, 2011


— With time growing short, President Barack Obama said Wednesday night that he remains confident that a government shutdown can be avoided this weekend if negotiators can build on constructive talks held at the White House.

Differences remain despite the progress, but Obama announced that talks would continue through the night in hopes of avoiding a government shutdown this weekend.

“It’s going to require a sufficient sense of urgency,” Obama said, “to complete a deal and get it passed and avert a shutdown.”

Obama emerged before reporters to declare his differences with the House Republicans were narrowing but that both sides were still stuck in an impasse.

“I thought the meetings were frank, they were constructive, and what they did was narrow the issues and clarify the issues that are still outstanding,” Obama said. “I remain confident that if we’re serious about getting something done, we should be able to complete a deal and get it passed and avert a shutdown. But it’s going to require a sufficient sense of urgency from all parties involved.”

After the White House session, House Speaker John Boehner said, “We did have a productive conversation this evening. We do have some honest differences, but I do think we made some progress. But I want to reiterate: There is no agreement on a number and there’s no agreement on the policy matters. But there’s an attempt on both sides to continue to work together to try to resolve this.”

The pressure built Wednesday as Boehner announced House Republicans would approve a stopgap spending bill blending $12 billion in new domestic spending cuts with the full-year Pentagon budget as the price for keeping the government open for another week.

Boehner’s move appeared aimed at shifting political blame if a shutdown occurs, but it angered Democrats who felt that talks were progressing.

“I think this is the responsible thing to do for the U.S. Congress, and I would hope the Senate can pass it and the president can sign it into law,” Boehner said.

He also criticized Obama, though saying he likes the commander in chief personally. “The president isn’t leading,” Boehner said. “He didn’t lead on last year’s budget, and he’s not leading on this year’s budget.”

Obama has already ruled out the weeklong measure Republicans intend to push through the House, and Senate Democrats have labeled it a non-starter. Republican officials said the details of the bill could yet change. But passage of any interim measure is designed to place the onus on the Democratic-controlled Senate to act if a shutdown is to be avoided.

The White House used its unmatched megaphone to emphasize the stakes involved in the negotiations, arranging a briefing for the presidential press corps on the ramifications of a partial government shutdown.

The officials who spoke did so on condition of anonymity, under rules set by White House aides eager to apply pressure to congressional negotiators.

The officials said that military personnel at home and abroad would receive one week’s pay instead of two in their next checks. Among those affected would be troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and the region around Libya.

Tax audits would be suspended — welcome news to some, no doubt — but there were unhappy tidings for others. Income tax returns filed on paper would pile up at the IRS, and refunds would be delayed as a result.

National parks would close, as would the Smithsonian Institution and its world-class collection of museums clustered along the National Mall within sight of the Capitol. Officials were less clear about the Cherry Blossom Festival, scheduled for this weekend in Washington.

NASA spokesman Bob Jacobs said he was unable to predict what the impact would be on preparations for the shuttle Endeavour’s flight on April 29, or Atlantis’ trip into space on June 28.

As for the broader talks, it appeared progress had been made both on spending cuts demanded by Republicans and on a series of unrelated provisions they attached to legislation that was approved almost six weeks ago.

A House-passed measure called for $61 billion in cuts, and until recently, the two sides had been working on a framework for $33 billion. Boehner pronounced that insufficient on Tuesday, and floated a $40 billion figure instead.

Democrats disputed any suggestion that they had acceded to that, but some, speaking privately, conceded they were willing to go higher than $33 billion, based on the make-up of the cuts included.

“I think we’ve made some progress. But we’re not finished, not by a long shot,” Boehner told reporters after a closed-door meeting with the Republican rank and file, the second of the week he has called as he maneuvers his way through the first significant test for a rambunctious new majority determined to cut spending.

Reid offered no details in an early morning speech that jabbed Boehner.


pace 7 years, 2 months ago

The teapots might do some good, they will teach the lazy population to vote. The tea pots think if they bring the country to a stop they can bully their numbers. The expressed desire of the republican party that their accession to power is more important than the economic recovery, jobs, foreclosures might be a bad idea. you think.

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 7 years, 2 months ago

"(except of course for the parasites that live off of society through the government)"

At least you finally admit that your primary motivation is a hatred of people who need help, and occasionally get it.

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 7 years, 2 months ago

The Republicans are playing a high-risk game. Can they achieve their self-fulfilling prophesy of proving that government "doesn't work," by pushing their sabotage to the max?

Fred Whitehead Jr. 7 years, 2 months ago

This is the collateral damage for voters who seem to find some value in the Palinist tea bag Republicans. They voted these idiots in to protest what they seem to think was a lot of "ecessive spending", aversion to National Public Radio because that organization values high quality and responsible journalism, unlike Fox news, their desire to destroy Planned Parenthood because there are extremist elements that want to make abortion a crime again, and other government supported enterprises that do not comply with their extreme right wingnut philosophies. THis might be the very best thing that could happen for the country to get people to wake up to the disgusting nature of these "tea bag" dolts who only seek to divide and conquer.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.