Archive for Sunday, September 26, 2010

States slow to act on stimulus spending

Little action on highway projects stunts job growth

September 26, 2010

Advertisement

— Federal stimulus money to fix America’s highways is stuck in the slow lane in some states, including a few that are suffering from some of the nation’s highest unemployment rates.

In California, for example, where the 12.4 percent unemployment rate is the third worst in the country, officials are rolling their highway money out far more gradually. As a result, the Golden State is far behind other states in the percentage of projects it’s started.

More than a year and a half after Congress passed a massive plan to stimulate the economy and get Americans working, California has yet to start 41 percent of its highway projects, according to a McClatchy analysis of the most recent federal data.

While some states have put their money to work quickly, others chose projects that have been slower to produce jobs, and so the nation is far from fulfilling President Barack Obama’s prediction that the highway stimulus dollars would create or save 150,000 jobs by the end of this year.

So far, according to an analysis of White House data, the highway stimulus spending has produced about 92,000 jobs. While administration officials said last week that the highway program is “on track” to meet its goals, a Department of Transportation stimulus update report found that the program had spent less than it was expected to.

“The highway building was oversold as a short-term jobs creator,” said Dan Seiver, a professor of finance at San Diego State University. “I think it is a good way to spend money. But given how capital-intensive road building is, it doesn’t generate an enormous number of jobs quickly.”

“If you really wanted to have a highway project that is intended to maximize employment, then build the highway with picks and shovels,” he added.

Liz Oxhorn, a White House spokeswoman for the stimulus program, said the highway funding is doing what it’s supposed to do.

“The more than 14,000 Recovery Act transportation projects nationwide are putting Americans to work across the country just as we said they would,” she said. “We stand by our estimates.”

Obama is now pitching a $50 billion transportation spending program, saying in a speech in Milwaukee earlier this month that he’d like to create an infrastructure bank that will “create jobs immediately,” as well as “make our economy hum over the long haul.”

That also was the intent of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the so-called stimulus bill that’s pumping more than $800 billion into the U.S. economy through a mixture of tax cuts and spending programs.

The bill included about $27 billion to help the Federal Highway Administration fix the nation’s roads. The money passed from the federal government to the states, which then decided what projects they wanted to fund.

According to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which helped design the bill’s transportation components, the stimulus package called for money “to be invested in ready-to-go projects.” States should give preference to projects that can be “started and completed expeditiously,” the committee said.

When the Government Accountability Office recently examined the spending rates in several states, it found that those that emphasized quick-to-start projects already had spent a far larger share of their money than those that didn’t. Illinois, Iowa and Mississippi, the GAO said, all had rates above 65 percent.

California, by contrast, had spent 26 percent of its highway money, one of the lowest rates studied by the GAO. Beyond that, Federal Highway Administration data show that 404 of California’s 981 projects, or 41 percent, have yet to be started. California will be getting $2.5 billion in highway stimulus funds, more than any other state.

Only Virginia has a higher percentage of projects it hasn’t started — 52 percent — federal data show. A spokesman for Virginia transportation officials said the state looked for projects that would have a long-term impact on the state, and that the collaborative process meant it was “several months before we began choosing projects.”

Comments

mr_right_wing 4 years, 7 months ago

The fiscal rape we have committed on yet unborn generations goes beyond unforgivable.

You'll notice I didn't point the finger at Obama; I said "we". Did any of us stand up and say "no, I'm not accepting this check!" (Blood money) No. That makes each one of us an accomplice (even me.)

What happened to thinking of future generations and trying to leave things better for them than they are for us? How utterly selfish.

As fisical rapists (and I don't think that term is the least bit too strong) we all need to bow our heads in shame. I don't even expect them (one day when we are all long dead) to forgive us.

Of course I'm making a big assumption that at some point the U.S. economy doesn't completely fail and our nation ceases to exist.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.