Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, September 19, 2010

Labels may be mum on genetically modified salmon

September 19, 2010

Advertisement

— As the Food and Drug Administration considers whether to approve genetically modified salmon, one thing seems certain: Shoppers staring at fillets in the seafood department will find it tough to pick out the conventional fish from the one created with genes from another species.

Despite a growing public demand for more information about how food is produced, that won’t happen with the salmon because of idiosyncrasies embedded in federal regulations.

The FDA says it cannot require a label on the genetically modified food once it determines that the altered fish is not “materially” different from other salmon — something agency scientists have said is true.

Perhaps more surprising, the agency won’t let conventional food makers trumpet the fact that their products don’t contain genetically modified ingredients.

The labeling question has emerged as the FDA determines whether to approve the fish, an Atlantic salmon known as AquAdvantage that grows twice as fast as its natural counterpart.

The decision carries great weight because, while genetically modified agriculture has been permitted for years and engineered crops are widely used in processed foods, this would be the first modified animal allowed for human consumption in the United States.

The AquAdvantage salmon has been given a gene from the ocean pout, an eel-like fish, and a growth hormone from a Chinook salmon.

Consumer advocates say they worry about labeling for genetically engineered beef, pork and other fish, which are lining up behind the salmon for federal approval.

The debate will be taken up this week, with an advisory committee meeting today and Monday on whether to allow the modified fish, and a separate panel meeting Tuesday on whether the fish should be labeled. The panels will offer recommendations to the FDA commissioner, who will decide both matters.

Comments

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 3 years, 10 months ago

So much for free and informed choices. But corporate profits are at stake, so I guess it's OK.

0

8muddyboots 3 years, 10 months ago

In 1878 Kansas tried to establish a population of salmon in the Kansas River.... http://www.examiner.com/watershed-in-topeka/kansas-salmon-flop

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.