Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, October 17, 2010

Library of the future: Despite Digital Age, expanded facility still likely to be utilized

October 17, 2010

Advertisement

Editor’s note: This is the second in a series of four stories centering on the proposal to expand the Lawrence Public Library. In the Nov. 2 election, voters will be asked to approve $18 million for the library, an amount that would be paid back through property taxes during the next 20 years.

Reader poll
Will you vote for the $18 million library expansion proposal?

or See the results without voting

With the growing popularity of new technologies for downloading and reading books and literature, coupled with the ease of online research, one may wonder what the future holds for public libraries.

With the growing popularity of new technologies for downloading and reading books and literature, coupled with the ease of online research, one may wonder what the future holds for public libraries.

The Reference Department, these days, may be the scariest section of Lawrence Public Library — at least for supporters of a 20,000-square-foot expansion of the library.

No, it’s not the librarian who can diagram the Dewey decimal system, or the patron who seemingly never runs out of arcane questions about where to find this or that.

In fact, it is not anything that exists in the reference department that causes unease. It is everything that doesn’t.

Does anybody remember the shelves and shelves of the Readers Guide to Periodical Literature that once existed in reference departments everywhere? If you were born in the Internet Age, probably not. One word — Google — has replaced quite a few dead trees in library reference sections.

“There are certain parts of a library’s collections that are smaller than they used to be,” said Jim Minges, director of the Lawrence-based Northeast Kansas Library System, which provides support to about 120 libraries in the area. “That will be true in the future too.”

As voters in the Nov. 2 election prepare to decide the fate of an $18 million proposal to expand the library and its parking, the question of just how much space a library will need in an increasingly digital age hangs heavy.

With an increase in the popularity of e-books, will the space needed for nonfiction bookshelves decrease? How about the fiction section? The children’s section?

Just how confident should Lawrence voters be that the library of the future will need the type of space that library leaders of the present say is critical?

“That probably is the key question of our discussion,” said Library Director Bruce Flanders.

The bygone book?

The answer to the question likely depends on how the publishing world — and ultimately consumers — answer their own questions about the future of the paper book.

The questions about the future of paper books are getting louder all the time as big-money promoters like Amazon and Apple peddle e-books — books that can be electronically downloaded and read on a variety of devices.

According to the International Digital Publishing Forum, U.S. wholesale totals for e-books have grown from about $25 million in the first quarter of 2009 to about $90 million in the second quarter of 2010.

But Minges has heard about the demise of the book many times and is still waiting for it to happen.

“There’s still a good market for printed books,” Minges said. “For the foreseeable future, there are still large groups of people who prefer a paper book. That probably will decrease as technology increases.

“But that is not something a library can base its planning on at this point.”

Indeed, the Association of American Publishers estimates e-book sales to be only about 9 percent of the overall book market.

“There are changes that are happening,” said Mike Machell, chair of the Lawrence Public Library Board. “The board understands there is a challenge in figuring out the future of libraries. I can see the day where you go to the front desk and rent a Kindle or a device like that. But I also think there are individuals who want to hold and touch a real book, and that will be true for a long time to come.”

Rapid change

Mike Shatzkin — a 40-year veteran of the publishing industry and the CEO of New York-based Idea Logical Company — can’t help but see the e-book trend of today and think about 1995.

In 1995, Shatzkin was a speaker at a national publishing conference. His role on the panel was to be the “way out there guy,” the speaker who made bold predictions.

One of those was that in the next five years Internet usage would become ubiquitous. It is hard to imagine that prediction ever being way out there, but in 1995 Shatzkin said only about 16 percent of adults had Internet access and only 10 percent had used the Internet in the last month.

What sticks in his mind today is that those numbers are about where e-book uptake is currently.

In an e-mail interview with the Journal-World, Shatzkin said the e-book momentum will impact libraries, but figuring out exactly how is a tough task at the moment. But a couple points, he said, are clear.

“It is going to create a lot of confusion and ultimately require some changes in business models,” Shatzkin said.

The crystal ball is cloudy, in part, because there is a lot of uncertainty about how e-book publishers will work with libraries. Shatzkin said e-book publishers aren’t convinced that allowing libraries to loan out e-book downloads will be good for business. Some e-book publishers already are boycotting e-book lending programs, and Shatzkin said it is likely that libraries — or their patrons — will have to pay for each e-book download.

That may be a slice of salvation for paper books and their role in the library of the future. Library leaders said a major appeal of libraries always has been the ability to access information for free. Even though e-books may take over the retail market, it could be that library users will be content with paper books if it means they don’t have to pay anything for them.

“If everybody could afford to buy their own books, libraries would never have come into existence,” Minges said. “But that’s never been the case, and I don’t think it will be in the future.”

Shatzkin recently declared in The Wall Street Journal that bricks-and-mortar bookstores are living on borrowed time. He isn’t yet ready to go that far on the future of libraries.

But the times demand close attention, he said. Remember that earlier number regarding e-book sales comprising about 9 percent of the total market? That number looks more impressive when you know that it grew from just 3 percent 12 months earlier. In one year, e-books gobbled up 6 percent of the market, and that’s before digital giant Google has fully implemented its e-book strategy.

Shatzkin told The Wall Street Journal he’s confident that e-book sales will account for 25 percent of the market by 2013, which is about the time Lawrence’s expanded library would be ready to open.

“As bookstores continue to diminish, it might actually create a short-run ‘lift’ for libraries,” Shatzkin told the Journal-World. “I don’t think we’ll see change as profound in libraries over the next three years as for bookstores. But it will be a lot different 10 years from now.”

Community space

Of all the people you would expect to be bullish on the future of paper books, it would be Flanders, the director of the library. Flanders is bullish on reading, on information, on openness. But Flanders doesn’t try to convince anyone that traditional books will be here forever.

“Will the printed book go away?” Flanders asked in his basement library office. “I think, sad to say, at some point it will.”

But that thought doesn’t give Flanders any pause in asking voters to give him a larger library today. For one, Flanders said he’s confident printed books won’t disappear overnight. It easily could be 20 to 30 years before e-books push printed books to the side.

That’s important to remember, he said, because the library is overcrowded today. The size of the library hasn’t increased since 1972, even though the city’s population has more than doubled. Usage statistics of the library have been growing by 8 percent to 12 percent during the economic downturn.

The library has only 50 public access computers, even though state accreditation standards call for 150. The library turned away 200 requests for meeting room space last year, and the library’s public parking lot frequently turns away motorists who can’t find a place to park.

“This expansion won’t be wasted,” Flanders said.

He’s confident of that because he’s certain new technology won’t phase out people. Nearly every library leader interviewed said that the library of the future will become much more of a social center for the community.

They said that will be a space-intensive operation as more room will be needed for meeting space, computer space, and increasingly classroom space to teach patrons how to use all this new technology.

It will be a far cry from the days when Flanders remembers loaning out vinyl records at the library.

“But the one thing that hasn’t changed in all that time is that the library as a physical building continues to be important,” Flanders said. “I don’t think it will change because we’re very good at bringing people and information together.”

Comments

conservative 3 years, 11 months ago

Flanders big argument for expansion at the end of the argument is expanding the number of computer terminals and increasing meeting space. I'm not so sure me need to drastically increase property taxes to create meeting space, and even if that is something people deem necessary both items can be accomplished much cheaper through a satellite location in existing buildings.

0

Boston_Corbett 3 years, 11 months ago

"drastically increase property taxes?"

0

Zachary Stoltenberg 3 years, 11 months ago

No, no, no, no, no! It's just too expensive and not the right time! Here's some interesting numbers. An Amazon kindle is 189.00 full retail price. There are roughly 100,000 people in Lawrence, not all use the library but for argument sake we'll throw them in. That means for almost the same price (18.9 million) you could buy everyone in Lawrence a kindle. But then, we wouldn't be building a parking garage for the Eldridge and the swimming pool. This is just thw wrong proposal at the wrong price in the wrong place. Send a clear message, vote NO!

0

parrothead8 3 years, 11 months ago

Actually, that's the Kindle with 3G. The regular Kindle with WiFi is only $139. So for $18,000,000, you could buy everyone in Lawrence a Kindle and have $4,000,000 left over to fix some of these crumbling roads.

0

Zachary Stoltenberg 3 years, 11 months ago

According to the library, only 70% of people in Lawrence have a library card. Furthermore, you could subtract children who can't yet read, those individuals who already own a kindle or iPad, and you're probably only looking at needing 50-65 thousand. At the basic model of $139 (and you know you're not paying full retail price if you are ordering over 50 thousand units) that's only about 9 Million dollars. Half the price... This ridiculous proposal needs to be stopped in it's tracks.

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 3 years, 11 months ago

What content would be put on those Kindles?

BTW, what percentage of the parking in that lot is currently used for the Eldridge?

0

Zachary Stoltenberg 3 years, 11 months ago

Bozo,

The kindle downloads the book you want to read at the time. It could be set up to where the library would "own" a digital collection that could be downloaded onto the citizen owned kindles through password permissions. And regardless of whether or not the Eldridge utilizes actual spaces in the existing lot, they do require parking somewhere. If they are parking elsewhere they are still displacing additional traffic. By code, you must provide parking at different densities for certain types of building uses. Hotels have a very high requirement. The issue is that it is not my responsibility as a tax payer to pay for the development of a parking garage to ease the burden created by irresponsible development of down town. Period.

0

booklover 3 years, 11 months ago

You might want to recheck your information and your figures. Books don't just magically appear on Kindle. You have to purchase them. Usually at the same price you would pay for a hardback book. Sometimes slightly less. Unlike books that a library can purchase and have multiple users re-check, ebooks are copywritten differently. Only the purchaser can use them. and it is not a forever deal. Just look at what happened recently when people lost entire libraries of purchased material because Amazon changed the rules all of sudden. So yeah while the smarta** response may be "just buy everyone their own Kindle..." it is in fact a truly stupid idea.

0

Zachary Stoltenberg 3 years, 11 months ago

You missed the point. The argument was to illustrate how incredibly idiotic it is to spend this much money on this proposal. If the reasons they give were true, that they want to improve access to technology, etc. they could do much better for much less.

0

CreatureComforts 3 years, 11 months ago

I have only a few times paid the same for a digital book as a paper book...and without the pesky tree-killing!

0

pizzapete 3 years, 11 months ago

Kindle, electronic books, whatever you want to call them are going to be like 8-tracks in 20 years. There is just no way to beat the old pencil and paper. I for one am not going to ever read a book written on anything other than paper.

0

yourneighbor 3 years, 11 months ago

what exact good would an empty kindle do? They don't come with books and you would have to purchase a separate copy for everyone who wanted to read a book at about $10 each. Your interesting numbers don't actually have any meaning whatsoever.

0

impska 3 years, 11 months ago

They have meaning because if you had a ballot that asked voters to vote on option A - spend 18M on a new library or option B - spend 9M to buy everyone in town a kindle AND maintain current library standards, I think it would be very unlikely that the library expansion would win.

The theoretical kindle-buy idea is just another example of why and how 18M is too much to spend on a library.

0

Ken Lassman 3 years, 11 months ago

Let me picture this: You get home and pull up your kindle, spend 10 bucks to download your kid's book, gather him or her over to help her/him read that book, and when it's time to turn the page, have her push the button????

I don't think you're really thinking through what you are giving up here. Furthermore, increasing the swimming pool parking is an excellent side benefit, as is the increased public space for public meetings. Both of these things need to be done and will benefit everyone in the community, library card holder or not.

0

impska 3 years, 11 months ago

I don't think I'd vote for either idea, personally, I think the library is fine as it is. Now, I might agree that the pool needs some help - but the problem with the pool is that it's too crowded. It doesn't need more parking so more people can use it. I'd support a new outdoor pool in another part of town, before I'd support a library overhaul. That is despite the fact that I currently use the library (weekly) and I never use the pool, due to crowding.

0

Ward 3 years, 11 months ago

Do the opinions and land holdings of Dolph Simons influence the reporting and stories about the Lawrence Public Library expansion?

0

David Roberts 3 years, 11 months ago

I like the talk of how the library can better serve Lawrence through the use of technology like digital books. But, please, please, please do not talk of completely replacing physical books with digital media. The library should also serve as a secure repository of knowledge in the event of a digital "happening." We completely replace paper at our own peril.

0

fu7il3 3 years, 11 months ago

Voting no for anything that has the potential to increase my taxes. Between three years without a raise, increased property taxes, inflation, and increased health care costs, I've got nothing left to give.

0

Just_One_Voice 3 years, 11 months ago

Amen to that....and I know that MANY, MANY people are in the same boat here. Now is NOT the time for this tax increase.

0

down_the_river 3 years, 11 months ago

The Borders location will be available before this construction project would be completed. While if would be great to see a grocery located there, the City should consider the economics of that location to supplement the existing library. The property is currently valued at 2.3 million, much less expensive than the 18 million we're being asked to pay.

0

Ken Lassman 3 years, 11 months ago

Nothing in the vote precludes buying this piece of property if it comes up, does it? Passing this measure seems like a win-win situation: if Borders folds and it seems like a good deal, the city has money to snatch it up and renovate it into the expansion with money to spare. If it doesn't match our needs, we go ahead with plan A. Either way, we end up with better infrastructure in a timely manner.

0

Thinking_Out_Loud 3 years, 11 months ago

A grocer at 7th and New Hampshire? I doubt it. Population density is the primary indicator of the success of these businesses in an area, and that location is not surrounded by enough population. I think the Mass Street Dillons is the closest spot where one becomes sustainable.

0

Ken Lassman 3 years, 11 months ago

And after 5 years, what do you have? -Half of the kindles are broken or lost -a quarter of them have moved away from Lawrence -the rest are supplanted by some new technology -you still have an overcrowded library that is still turning away folks who want to have a meeting, are still using the materials which have never made it to the internet, and are still being utilized by the sizable fraction of the population that prefer books.

Doesn't even sound worth discussing any more to me.

0

yourneighbor 3 years, 11 months ago

This was intended to post as a reply to Ward re: the Simon's influence of the reporting.

0

del888 3 years, 11 months ago

Why don't we just put all the books on CD or DVD and make the library smaller!

0

impska 3 years, 11 months ago

Isn't this article a good argument for waiting 5 years so the city has a better idea of technology trends? The library isn't going to fall down in the next little while, why is there such a rush?

0

beaujackson 3 years, 11 months ago

VOTE NO!!

Satellite libraries need only computers, periodicals, and reference books.

TWO new satellite libraries could be built for the cost of the downtown parking garage.

0

Thinking_Out_Loud 3 years, 11 months ago

I don't believe Lawrence is ready for a satellite library. We are simply too small to need a satellite, and we are too large for the existing facility. We have several options, of course, of which one is an expansion, a second is a new facility, and a third is to put up with an inadequate physical facility.

0

Clevercowgirl 3 years, 11 months ago

I go to the downtown library a lot during the summer with my kids. We have NEVER had a problem parking. Furthermore, there is loads of room in the basement for more computers. Meeting rooms? Rent an annex for now. We have made it for many years in the current library. Surely we can make it a few more without a full-blown renovation. Certainly things could be done to spruce up the library for a small fraction of what they are proposing. HELLO...... we are in the midst of a huge recession. Not many are in the mood to spend 18 million to make our library nicer. Our community can't afford it right now. I feel that this is an innapropriate proposal given the current economy. Right now, with a majority of us making do with what we have, not many are willing to buy into this.

0

50YearResident 3 years, 11 months ago

Nobody every thought we could do without a (land line) telephone in our home. Now more and more homes are going to mobil phones with no direct line phone. Libraries are doing the same thing, soon there will be no need to set foot into an actual library building to read a book. Why spend $18,000,000.00 on outdated technology? Vote NO!

0

barlowtl 3 years, 11 months ago

Pls, pls, be very careful how much you compromise to just get something passed. The problems you have now & have been dealing with for years is a result of too much compromise. The location was a compromise & makes it difficult & expensive to expand. The parking lot is a city lot, shared with many other entities. The children's room, reference area, storage areas all were inadequate the day we moved in. The library is the living room of your community and is often taken into consideration when potential businesses decide whether or not to move here. In prior years we found that library use increased in hard times and budgets were cut at the same time. When school libraries had to cut back, the public library took up some of the slack. So give this a lot of thought before you vote. I no longer have a right to vote but I do have very fond memories of Lawrence and in the end I'm confident your vote will be a thoughtful one. Meanwhile, while you thoughtfully discuss this, be kind to each other.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.