Advertisement

Archive for Saturday, November 20, 2010

Pilots exempted from some airport checks

November 20, 2010

Advertisement

— Amid a growing protest against stepped-up and intrusive screening of airline passengers, the government has cut a break for one very influential group of travelers — the pilots.

The Transportation Security Administration agreed Friday to let uniformed airline pilots skip the body scans and aggressive pat-downs at the heart of a national uproar. The pilots must pass through a metal detector at airport checkpoints and present photo IDs that prove their identity.

The victory for pilots followed a 2-year lobbying campaign by their union leaders that reached a fever pitch in the past two weeks. Their bid was boosted by hero pilot Chesley Sullenberger, who said pilots should be treated as “trusted partners” in the fight against terrorism.

But just days before the hectic Thanksgiving holiday travel period, TSA chief John Pistole offered little hope of a similar reprieve for regular passengers, who have complained more loudly about the new measures. Some are urging travelers to refuse to go through full-body scanners, which produce a virtually naked image.

If the loosely organized Internet campaign succeeds, security lines at the nation’s airports could be snarled. Those who refuse a body scan can be forced to undergo time-consuming fingertip examinations, which include clothed genital areas and breasts, by inspectors of the same sex as the traveler.

The complaints of pilots like Sullenberger, who successfully landed a passenger jet in the Hudson River in January 2009, gave weight to the movement to roll back the new procedures. With pilots apparently satisfied, the TSA’s most prominent critic may be a California software engineer who recorded himself threatening a TSA inspector, “If you touch my junk, I’ll have you arrested.”

The pilots are avoiding that argument. American Airlines pilot Sam Mayer said it’s a security matter for the TSA to decide. All he knows, Mayer said, is that intrusive screening for pilots makes little sense.

A pilot intent on terrorism could simply crash the plane. No amount of imaging at the security checkpoint could stop that. Besides, under another government program to make them the last line of defense against terrorists, pilots are allowed to have guns in the cockpit.

The changes promised by TSA on Friday are “basically what we’ve been after,” Mayer said. “Pilots are not the threat here; we’re the target.”

Comments

oldbaldguy 4 years, 1 month ago

everytime i have flown after 9/11, i get the works because of all the metal in my body. i suspect when i fly again i will get the new full treatment. if everyone had been doing their job 9/11 would not have happened. god help us when a terrorist gets through with explosives up his wazoo. did tsa discuss these methods with the white house, doj or the top congressional leaders before implementing? have we ever caught a bad guy at screening in an airport? I suspect the answer is no. all this is a waste of time and money. innocent people are subjected to public humiliation. when wil the first scan picture show up on youtube? stay tuned for further developments

imastinker 4 years, 1 month ago

That makes sense. Who ever heard of pilots who blow up planes anyway?

Commenting has been disabled for this item.