Advertisement

Opinion

Opinion

Diplomatic defiance marks U.S. retreat

May 21, 2010

Advertisement

— It is perfectly obvious that Iran’s latest uranium maneuver, brokered by Brazil and Turkey, is a ruse. Iran retains more than enough enriched uranium to make a bomb. And it continues enriching at an accelerated pace and to a greater purity (20 percent). Which is why the French foreign ministry immediately declared that the trumpeted temporary shipping of some Iranian uranium to Turkey will do nothing to halt Iran’s nuclear program.

It will, however, make meaningful sanctions more difficult. America’s proposed Security Council resolution is already laughably weak — no blacklisting of Iran’s central bank, no sanctions against Iran’s oil and gas industry, no nonconsensual inspections on the high seas. Yet Turkey and Brazil — both current members of the Security Council — are so opposed to sanctions that they will not even discuss the resolution. And China will now have a new excuse to weaken it further.

But the deeper meaning of the uranium-export stunt is the brazenness with which Brazil and Turkey gave cover to the mullahs’ nuclear ambitions and deliberately undermined U.S. efforts to curb Iran’s program.

The real news is that already notorious photo: the president of Brazil, our largest ally in Latin America, and the prime minister of Turkey, for more than half a century the Muslim anchor of NATO, raising hands together with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the most virulently anti-American leader in the world.

That picture — a defiant, triumphant take-that-Uncle-Sam — is a crushing verdict on the Obama foreign policy. It demonstrates how rising powers, traditional American allies, having watched this administration in action, have decided that there’s no cost in lining up with America’s enemies and no profit in lining up with a U.S. president given to apologies and appeasement.

They’ve watched President Obama’s humiliating attempts to appease Iran, as every rejected overture is met with abjectly renewed U.S. negotiating offers. American acquiescence reached such a point that the president was late, hesitant and flaccid in expressing even rhetorical support for democracy demonstrators who were being brutally suppressed and whose call for regime change offered the potential for the most significant U.S. strategic advance in the region in 30 years.

They’ve watched America acquiesce to Russia’s re-exerting sway over Eastern Europe, over Ukraine (pressured by Russia last month into extending for 25 years its lease of the Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol) and over Georgia (Russia’s de facto annexation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia is no longer an issue under the Obama “reset” policy).

They’ve watched our appeasement of Syria, Iran’s agent in the Arab Levant — sending our ambassador back to Syria even as it tightens its grip on Lebanon, supplies Hezbollah with Scuds, and intensifies its role as the pivot of the Iran-Hezbollah-Hamas alliance. The price for this ostentatious flouting of the U.S. and its interests? Ever more eager U.S. “engagement.”

They’ve observed the administration’s gratuitous slap at Britain over the Falklands, its contemptuous treatment of Israel, its undercutting of the Czech Republic and Poland, and its indifference to Lebanon and Georgia. And in Latin America, they see not just U.S. passivity as Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez organizes his anti-American “Bolivarian” coalition while deepening military and commercial ties with Iran and Russia. They saw active U.S. support in Honduras for a pro-Chavez would-be dictator seeking unconstitutional powers in defiance of the democratic institutions of that country.

This is not just an America in decline. This is an America in retreat — accepting, ratifying and declaring its decline, and inviting rising powers to fill the vacuum.

Nor is this retreat by inadvertence. This is retreat by design and, indeed, on principle. It’s the perfect fulfillment of Obama’s adopted Third World narrative of American misdeeds, disrespect and domination from which he has come to redeem us and the world. Hence his foundational declaration at the U.N. General Assembly last September that “No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation” (guess who’s been the dominant nation for the last two decades?) and his dismissal of any “world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another.” (NATO? The West?)

Given Obama’s policies and principles, Turkey and Brazil are acting rationally. Why not give cover to Ahmadinejad and his nuclear ambitions? As the U.S. retreats in the face of Iran, China, Russia and Venezuela, why not hedge your bets? There’s nothing to fear from Obama, and everything to gain by ingratiating yourself with America’s rising adversaries. After all, they actually believe in helping one’s friends and punishing one’s enemies.

— Charles Krauthammer is a columnist for Washington Post Writers Group. letters@charleskrauthammer.com

Comments

cato_the_elder 4 years, 7 months ago

Krauthammer nails it again. Obama's "foreign policy" has been disastrous for America. Hillary and Bill are chomping at the bit to run in 2012, and boy will she be full of invective about the things she was "ordered to do" and vehemently disagreed with while she was Secretary of State. Look for her to resign a few months after the November elections.

georgiahawk 4 years, 7 months ago

I think I can sum up the article; if your are not an aggressive a**hole, if the rest of the world does not think you are an overbearing jerk who thinks you can never be wrong and will definitely not admit to being even slightly wrong, if you are not disliked by the rest of the world then you are a weak American President.

God forbid we should ever treat another country as equals. Manifest destiny is alive and well in Krautboys mind and world.

Brent Garner 4 years, 7 months ago

It would be nice if the world operated as you think it does, georgiahawk. Sadly, it does not. In the international arena the name of the game is power and the law of the jungle is in full sway. The weak, if they do not have a powerful protector, are at the mercy of the strong. British and French weakness in the face of Hitler's numerous pre-war actions led inexoribly to World War 2. Do remember that nature abhors a vacuum and in the international arena that is doubly true.

jafs 4 years, 7 months ago

We can be strong without being aggressive, by having a strong national defense.

Not trying to dominate other nations and not wanting to elevate one nation above another seem like very good foreign policy goals to me.

If we want, we can try to help protect the weaker from the stronger as well.

Brent Garner 4 years, 7 months ago

Never show weakness to an enemy. Oh, I forgot. We have Obama! Weakness on full and public display!

jafs 4 years, 7 months ago

TS,

We get it - you hate Obama and the Democrats.

Other than helping you vent, and perhaps preventing you from abusing your wife and/or family, what do you think your continued anger-filled posts accomplishes?

Richard Heckler 4 years, 7 months ago

Guess what Charles?

Turkey and Brazil cannot trust the USA government.

BUSH/CHENEY placed the final nails in the coffin.

The world is expecting more than they are getting from Obama. However with Bob Gates still around the blemish on the USA will NOT go away.

jafs 4 years, 6 months ago

Perhaps if America changed some of the ways we act around the world, we'd create fewer enemies.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.