Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Important input

How one or more community task forces are formed to study local school facilities will play a large role in their success.

March 31, 2010

Advertisement

Seeking community input on school facilities is a good move, but the Lawrence school district’s preliminary plans for a task force to provide that input raise some questions and concerns.

School board members made the right decision in delaying any elementary school closings until at least the fall of 2011. Finances will be no better next year, but decisions about elementary schools can be linked to the board’s consideration of moving Lawrence sixth-graders to the junior highs and ninth-graders into the district’s two high schools in fall 2011.

If the board goes ahead with that move, it will have a significant impact on facility use in the district. For that reason, it seems odd that the charge of the task force currently being formed is only to study the district’s elementary buildings, their condition and capacities.

School board members already had scheduled two public meetings — one at 7 p.m. Thursday at Free State High School and another at 7 p.m. Tuesday at Lawrence High School — to talk about a possible shift to four-year high schools. Will a separate community task force be formed to look at moving sixth- and ninth-graders, the impact on facilities and how students could be moved with a minimum of disruption?

It seems that without such a task force, board members could find themselves facing a community uprising not unlike this year’s Save Our Schools campaign when they decide to move forward on a reconfiguration plan. If it’s too much for one task force to consider all of the facilities implications of the reconfiguration, there should at least be some communication or crossover between the two task forces.

The composition of any task force often is the key to its success. Members need to come to the table with the community in mind and not as representatives of a certain school or viewpoint. For that reason, simply taking applications may not fill the bill. The district shouldn’t hesitate to do some active recruiting to get the kind of expertise and leadership that’s needed on the task force.

Superintendent Rick Doll said he envisions the task force including architectural or long-range planning consultants, but a strong task force should be able to move forward without paid consultants. Does the board want a community recommendation or a consultants’ recommendation? District officials and perhaps some Kansas University faculty members can provide the data and expertise the task force needs without the added expense of a consultant.

The size of the task force also is a valid concern. Twenty members may not be too many if the group splits into working subgroups to look into various issues, but Board President Scott Morgan is right that the number of members needs to be manageable.

As we’ve noted, seeking community input on major school district decisions is a positive move because it increases the chances of building community consensus on district actions. To increase the chances of building consensus, however, board members need to carefully consider how task forces are formed and how their task is defined.

Comments

cato_the_elder 4 years, 9 months ago

Taxpayers, beware. Moving ninth grade students to the high school buildings will result in a push for a third high school almost immediately therafter, which is precisely what this move has been designed to do. If ninth graders remain in the present 7-9 configuration, Lawrence won't need a third high school for another twenty years. Think about it.

jackson5 4 years, 9 months ago

The district keeps saying the move to 9-12 will save money.
However, the board has discussed how this will require some modifications at the high schools. In addition, Doll told parents last fall that he wants to investigate building 9th grade centers on each campus to isolate the freshmen so they don't feel overwhelmed in big schools.
Sounds expensive to me.

I look forward to seeing the district present the savings figures (including an offsetting construction costs) at the public meetings this week.

not_that_crazy 4 years, 9 months ago

We will be the ONLY school district in the entire state of Kansas that will not have four year high schools next school year.

lindsaydoyle 4 years, 9 months ago

The first item of discussion should be the Administration facilities. If you have underutilized area, downsize the schools and move admin offices into them then you can sell off the admin facilities. Makes better sense than closing neighborhood schools. The administration does not have to all be in one location.

grammaddy 4 years, 9 months ago

So what? Maybe we can also be the only one to NOT close any schools, too.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.