Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Job cuts an issue at city budget talks

Some are saying layoffs of city employees should be considered to make the budget.

June 16, 2010

Advertisement

Optimism and pessimism battled at Lawrence City Hall on Tuesday, as city commissioners did their most detailed work yet on what’s expected to be a tight 2011 budget.

City Manager David Corliss told commissioners he’s building his recommended budget on the hopeful assessment that Lawrence sales tax collections will increase by about 2 percent over this year’s totals, which are coming in below expectations.

“I’m still optimistic that that the economy will see some growth,” Corliss said.

But at least one commissioners said he believes 2011 might be the year the city needs to implement more significant employee layoffs.

“It is a tough pill to swallow, but I know a lot of businesses are having to look at reducing their payrolls,” Commissioner Lance Johnson said. “I don’t think the city is immune from that.”

Other commissioners stopped short of directing Corliss to look seriously at layoffs.

“My personal goal will be to make sure that doesn’t happen,” Mayor Mike Amyx said.

The city has left several positions that have become vacant unfilled, but largely has avoided layoffs. Corliss is recommending that five vacant positions — most in Parks and Recreation and Public Works — remain unfilled for 2011.

Johnson also said he questioned whether the city was doing enough to really invest in economic development initiatives that would grow the city’s tax base, calling much of the City Hall talk on the subject “lip service.”

Amyx labeled that assessment “harsh,” noting that the city had invested money to improve business opportunities at the airport, in a West Campus biosciences incubator and a west Lawrence bioscience laboratory building.

In other budget news from the city’s study session:

• Corliss currently is estimating that the city will take in $64.3 million in its general fund in 2011. That’s up about $900,000, or 1.4 percent, from what the city expects to receive in 2010. Based on those estimates — which rely on sales tax collections increasing by 2 percent— the city would have a budget that is slightly out of balance. Corliss is estimating that city expenses in 2011 will come in about $100,000 more than revenues. The city has about $12 million in a version of a savings account that can cover such overages. Corliss thus far is not recommending an increase in the property tax mill levy.

• About $5 million worth of new debt is being proposed as part of Corliss’ budget to fund new capital improvements. Among the projects proposed are: replacement of one fire truck; resurfacing of West Sixth Street from Massachusetts to Iowa streets, and resurfacing and widening of West Sixth from Monterey Way to Folks Road; and the rebuilding of the westbound lanes of Bob Billings Parkway from Kasold to Crestline drives.

Commissioners will continue to work on the budget throughout the summer. The city must have an approved 2011 budget by late August.

Comments

johnboy83 4 years, 6 months ago

Yea start layin people off. I bet none of the big wigs see a pay cut. What a good idea..... layoff that guy so i get to keep my dollar. How about everyone take cuts and everyone keep their jobs.

Yabut 4 years, 6 months ago

That was only temporary. He's had 2 assistant city managers for over a year now, plus an assistant TO the city manager, and a secretary. You wanna start eliminating jobs? Start at the 4th floor.

Kontum1972 4 years, 6 months ago

raise the rates on the downtown parking meters....and make them pay for parking at night also, plus i noticed the number of illegal u-turns on Mass St. at night particulary in front of Tellers and Jeffersons i witnessed 6 vehicles do this that evening. You want primo parking spots so u wont have too far to walk after your intoxicated at a bar or club.

booklover 4 years, 6 months ago

Hey itkonlyyou123 you missed one! Don't forget to spam this one too!

formerlawres 4 years, 6 months ago

Bet a few department heads or supervisors could take a pay cut! Why lay off the people who acutally work for their paycheck? I worked for the City for 5 years and did more work than the Director ever did! Why are so many supervisors needed, this is the question that needs to be answered! Less supervisors would result in the Department head to actually have to WORK!

Commenting has been disabled for this item.