Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Understanding Arizona’s immigration law

July 7, 2010

Advertisement

— Unless it is halted by a judge, Arizona’s new immigration law is set to take effect July 29.

The Justice Department and civil rights groups have filed suit against the law, arguing that immigration is the purview of the federal government and that SB 1070 will promote racial profiling.

Q. What does the law do?

A. The law essentially mandates that local governments in Arizona enforce immigration laws. The provision that has received the most attention is the creation of a new state crime: failure to possess proper immigration documents.

SB 1070 also forbids local entities, such as city councils or police departments, from making it a policy to ignore federal immigration laws. It allows people to sue if such a policy is formulated.

However, it may take months or years to learn the impact of the law because judges will likely rule on how it can be implemented.

Q: What are police required to do under the law?

A: If officers stop, detain or arrest people while enforcing other laws or ordinances and reasonably suspect they are in the country illegally, they have to try to determine their status if it’s practicable.

In other words, police don’t have to determine someone’s legal status if there’s a shootout going on. They also get a pass if inquiring would hinder an investigation — by scaring off witnesses, for example.

Q: How does this change things?

A: Currently, all law enforcement officers in the country, unless forbidden by management, are allowed to check on the immigration status of people they stop or arrest. This makes checking a requirement.

Police departments generally notify federal immigration officials when violent criminals who are illegal immigrants are being released from jail. SB 1070 makes it mandatory, and applies to low-grade offenders as well as violent felons.

Comments

jaywalker 4 years, 5 months ago

Thank you for explaining the law in layman's terms. Perhaps some will now comprehend it's scope and cease with the hyperbole.

grammaddy 4 years, 5 months ago

Just define reasonable suspicion for me. Considering that AZ is full of Native Americans and LEGAL Mexican-Americans, what is reasonable suspicion? I guess everyone there will be carrying ALL their ID.

imastinker 4 years, 5 months ago

Would you be opposed to it if it required officers to ask everyone regardless of reasonable suspicion?

scott3460 4 years, 5 months ago

It is often the case that the LJW version of these syndicated columns contain only certain bits and pieces. In this case it appears that we get about 1/3 of the original article, which, of course, conveys a different and less comprehensive message for readers here.

The complete column includes this relevant information, which has been one of the right's main talking points in defense of Arizona's action:

"Is this the same as federal law?

No. Although many of the crimes in SB 1070 are modeled on existing federal crimes, federal law does not require local police officers to check immigration status. There's also no right under federal law for people to sue local agencies that have policies against enforcing immigration laws."

Commenting has been disabled for this item.