Advertisement

Opinion

Opinion

Bayh’s exit is bad sign for Congress

February 17, 2010

Advertisement

— The most striking part of Sen. Evan Bayh’s retirement announcement was his on-air job application. He’d be interested in managing a business, Bayh suggested, heading a university, or maybe running a charity.

“I love helping our citizens make the most of their lives,” Bayh said, “but I do not love Congress,” bluntly assessing an institution he has known since he was 7 and his father became senator.

Teddy Roosevelt famously lauded “the man who is actually in the arena,” who “if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.” What happens, though, when the arena is dysfunctional? The Senate, with its endless holds and 60-vote points of order, may be the epitome of a place that knows neither victory nor defeat.

“It’s a bad sign,” Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine told me about Bayh’s retirement. “The loss of someone like Evan speaks volumes about people’s frustrations with the Senate and our failure to work in a bipartisan fashion.”

Maybe the arena has shifted. Maybe, for the man — or woman — who wants to make a difference, politics is not the optimal venue. Maybe it’s easier to make your mark from the Gates Foundation than from a Senate seat. Maybe the CEO of Google — your average Google vice president, even — wields more influence over people’s lives than an individual member of Congress. Maybe it’s a better use of time to promote scientific research than to slog from one quorum call to the next.

“The way Congress is working right now, I decided I could make a better contribution to my state and country on a smaller stage,” Bayh told me Tuesday. “There are some ideologues in the Senate. There are some staunch partisans. The vast majority are good, decent people who are trapped in a system that does not let that goodness and decency translate itself into legislative accomplishments.”

When his father Birch Bayh was running for re-election in 1968, Bayh noted, Republican leader Everett Dirksen approached the Democrat on the Senate floor and asked how he could help. “It’s unthinkable today,” Bayh said. “One after another, the barriers to incivility get broken down. Senators actively fundraise against their colleagues, they campaign against their colleagues and that is not conducive to consensus building if you know the people you have to work with want to do you in.”

Indeed, the Senate has been transformed even since Evan Bayh arrived in 1999. During the 106th Congress, from 1999 to 2001, there were fewer cloture petitions filed to end debate on filibusters than there have been halfway through the 111th Congress. Then, there were perhaps a dozen moderate Republicans. Now, except for Maine’s Collins and Olympia Snowe, they are all gone.

Bayh, who speaks with the experience of a man with $13 million in his campaign account, attributed some of the changed atmosphere to the incessant demands of fundraising. “Back in my father’s day, the saying was that you legislated for four years and you ran for re-election for two,” he said. “If you’re constantly raising funds, if you’re constantly running for re-election, that affects how people behave.”

The optimist in me would like to see Bayh’s departure as the wake-up call the Senate needs. The optimist takes heart in the prospect next year of a larger cadre of centrist Republicans with political incentives to compromise rather than obstruct. The optimist looks at Virginia Democrat Mark Warner and Tennessee Republican Bob Corker trying again on financial regulation, Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden and New Hampshire Republican Judd Gregg gearing up on tax reform — and thinks: Someone’s got to keep at this.

“The forecast for this country is bleak if people are just going to say that the dysfunction has been institutionalized,” Warner told me. “I just can’t accept that.”

The realist in me watches the fervent Tea Partiers, tugging the Republican Party even further to the right, and the Republican congressional leadership, reaping the short-term rewards of obstruction — and worries.

“What I think Evan has been trying to communicate is that politics cannot be seen as a zero-sum game where one side wipes the floor with the other side,” Wyden told me. Until this happens, he said, “I think you’re going to see more good and thoughtful people say that they’re going to find other things to do.”

— Ruth Marcus is a columnist for Washington Post Writers Group. marcusr@washpost.com

Comments

jafs 4 years, 2 months ago

ferris,

That would be great.

Unfortunately, since it takes so much money to campaign/get elected, by the time candidates are electable, they are beholden to whomever financed their campaign, unless they are independently wealthy.

So we vote these guys out, and replace them with others who have the same problems.

0

Brent Garner 4 years, 2 months ago

Bayh is simple another socialist leftist pretending to be centrist who at least has the intelligence to see what is coming and wants out of the way. Give him credit for being able to tell which way the wind is blowing. Bye Bye Bayh, and good riddance! Can you take Dingy Harry Reid, liar extraordinaire, with you?

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 4 years, 2 months ago

"One big conspiracy theory?"

Conspiracies do happen, but that's probably only a very minor part of this phenomenon. It's more of a confluence of interests among the economic and political elites who quite literally own and control this country. They know quite well, without the need for secret meetings (not that they are generally very transparent in their dealings,) what's in their best interest, and they generally get it.

0

barrypenders 4 years, 2 months ago

jabot b is an honorable participant and he realizes that 'Money talks, B S walks', jaywalker.

Stimulus, Whirled Peas, and Posercare live unprecedented

Darwin bless you

0

ferrislives 4 years, 2 months ago

It's too bad that his best statement is getting lost in the whole "another bad day for Democrats" thing. Here is what people should take away from what he's doing: "Bayh argued that the American people needed to deliver a "shock" to Congress by voting incumbents out en masse and replacing them with people interested in reforming the process and governing for the good of the people, rather than deep-pocketed special-interest groups."

This is what needs to happen for us to have a clean slate in Washington. Otherwise, this cycle of partisanship will never end, and nothing will ever truly be accomplished. Remember, the GOP had control of everything for eight years, and did nothing very good with it. In fact, they spent plenty of our money on crap like the Democrats are now doing, more than any Congress in history, and now we can see where we're at after eight years of spending and tax cuts with no real reform. How easily they forget.

0

jaywalker 4 years, 2 months ago

"Easy-- the corporations who control the government's agenda-- and it doesn't hurt that they also happen to own and control the mainstream media."

One big conspiracy theory? Now that's really usin' your noggin. Your real name ain't Rosie, is it? Yours must be a sad, lonely world, bozo.

0

cato_the_elder 4 years, 2 months ago

At least this piece contains a key part of one of Theodore Roosevelt's most incisive quotes, although someone should tell Ms. Marcus that he hated being called "Teddy."

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 4 years, 2 months ago

"Who gets to define "center"?"

Easy-- the corporations who control the government's agenda-- and it doesn't hurt that they also happen to own and control the mainstream media.

0

jafs 4 years, 2 months ago

Just a question:

Who gets to define "center"?

0

barrypenders 4 years, 2 months ago

This guy is obviously not a PAD. PADs don't know any better and will do what they do 'Propagandizing' and 'Disillusioning' along the way.

Stimulus, Progressive Articulate Diphthongs, and Posercare live unprecedented

Darwin bless us all

0

georgiahawk 4 years, 2 months ago

Just wondering Tom, do you consider yourself an American first or a republican (conservative) first? You seem to take special pleasure in the dysfunctional character of politics that has intensified in the last several years. Do you really think that you are never wrong and are so right that if you don't get your way that dysfunction is the only other option?

0

Larry Bauerle 4 years, 2 months ago

And the comments prove her point.

0

Eybea Opiner 4 years, 2 months ago

Hey, Ruth, how about calling for some centrist Democrats? Oh, that's right, you think Harry Reid is the center. You think Pelosi is centrist, and you think B.O. is straddling the center line.

You can quit wondering why the NY Times, Washington Post, and other "mainstream" media are suffering readership and viewership losses.

0

preebo 4 years, 2 months ago

Perhaps now that he is not saddled with the burden of re-election he will start voting through some real progressive measures before he leaves office. His father was an unapologetic liberal and he used to be a fairly strong progressive.

0

Tom Shewmon 4 years, 2 months ago

"Then, there were perhaps a dozen moderate Republicans. Now, except for Maine’s Collins and Olympia Snowe, they are all gone."

" The optimist takes heart in the prospect next year of a larger cadre of centrist Republicans with political incentives to compromise rather than obstruct."

Again, we see the lamestream media can not accept the fact that the leadership of Pelosi and Reid and their inner circle of far-left idealogues are most of the problem, but rather finger-point at the Republicans. How ridiculous this is getting. Get real.

0

cato_the_elder 4 years, 2 months ago

"Bayh's exit is bad sign for Congress." No, it's a bad sign for Democrats.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.