Archive for Thursday, September 17, 2009

Health care plan closes some but not all gaps

September 17, 2009


— You’re a 51-year-old single mother raising two kids and juggling a mortgage and a car loan. Because you’re self-employed, getting health insurance has always been a problem. Under the new Senate plan, you still might have to stretch your budget to pay premiums even if the coverage is more secure.

The health care plan unveiled Wednesday by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., strives to contain costs for taxpayers, reducing the risk that covering the uninsured will blow the federal deficit wide open. But that means benefits are not as generous as in competing plans from Senate and House Democrats.

“We’ve done everything imaginable to get the most generous, most affordable coverage we can within President Obama’s target of $900 billion,” Baucus said, referring to the president’s 10-year estimate of what the legislation should cost.

A free lunch it’s not.

For consumers, the Baucus plan comes with costs and benefits, rights and responsibilities. Though people with employer-provided health care would not see dramatic changes, the plan is broad enough that it would touch every American family in some way. Here’s a look at how consumers in different circumstances would be affected:

• Self-employed head of household

If anyone is meant to benefit from the plan, it’s people who have to scramble to find and keep coverage because they work for themselves, not a large employer.

Baucus would eliminate onerous insurance practices, such as denial of coverage due to a pre-existing health problem. But subsidies in the plan may not be enough to make coverage affordable for all middle-class families, who would be required under the bill to carry insurance.

According to the Washington-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which advocates for low-income people, a family of three earning about $55,000 — three times the federal poverty level — would have to pay 13 percent of its income. That’s roughly $7,100 a year. A three-person family earning about $27,500 would have to pay 5.5 percent of its income, a premium of about $1,570.

• Senior covered by Medicare

Seniors would get a 50 percent discount on medications if they fall into the “doughnut hole” coverage gap in the Medicare prescription drug benefits. At least 3 million a year get caught in the gap.

Medicare recipients also would get a free annual wellness visit with their doctor to focus on ways to stay healthier. Coverage for end-of-life counseling, which caused an uproar when it was included in the House bill, isn’t part of the Baucus plan. Coverage for preventive care would be expanded.

• Single woman in her 20s

People in their twenties — called “young invincibles” by policy experts — account for a sizable share of uninsured.

Under the Baucus plan, they’d be required to get coverage and pay into the pool. But depending on income, they’d be eligible for subsidies they can’t get now. They’d also have the option of buying a lower-cost plan, tailored to those 25 and under, which would cover mainly preventive care and catastrophic medical costs.

Insurers would not be allowed to charge women more because of gender, a practice that is now common. And health care plans would have to cover prenatal care and pregnancy.

• Immigrants

Immigrants are more likely to be uninsured than the U.S. population as a whole. The Baucus plan would let legal immigrants get federal subsidies for health insurance but would bar benefits for those here illegally. Baucus has called for a verification system to make sure that no subsidies go to illegal immigrants.


just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 8 years, 9 months ago

"The health care plan unveiled Wednesday by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., strives to contain costs for taxpayers, reducing the risk that covering the uninsured will blow the federal deficit wide open."

Let's call it like it really is-- Eliminating the massive rationing that our current system has isn't what drives up the costs. What drives up the costs is the inefficiency and profiteering of the current system.

SettingTheRecordStraight 8 years, 9 months ago

And what drives up the cost of food are the greedy supermarkets and the greedy farmers and the greedy wholesalers.

And what drives up the cost of transportation are the greedy car manufacturers and the greedy auto dealerships and the greedy mechanics.

Bozo, you can fill in the blank with any industry you like and it still doesn't legitimize a government takeover of healthcare. You just hate captialism along with the wealth-creation it provides and the personal responsibility it requires.

Clearly, you won't be happy until everyone is living miserable, servile lives under the thumb of government bureaucrats and elitists like you.

jaywalker 8 years, 9 months ago

Nearly every time I hear someone on radio or tv talk about these proposals they begin their remarks with:

"From what I understand..."

Hard to believe anything's well-crafted when noone knows how it works.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.