Double Take: Boys direly need lessons on birth control / LJWorld.com

Archive for Tuesday, September 8, 2009

By Dr. Wes Crenshaw and Samantha Schwartz

September 8, 2009

Wes: I thought we’d made great strides in reducing teen pregnancy, but research and clinical experience say otherwise. According to the Centers for Disease Control, a third of girls will get pregnant before age 20. The teen birth rate actually rose by 3 percent between 2005 and 2006, after dropping 34 percent over the last decade. Kids used to come to my office well-prepared on topics of birth control and disease prevention, ready instead to consider the emotional and psychological aspects of their decisions. Some still come in that way, but far too many do not.

I can’t account for this. Despite lots of made-up controversy about abstinence versus sex education, the availability of information and professional services for young people has steadily increased. As unreliable as the Internet can be for educating kids on sexuality, all one need do is Google “birth control” to get 12.2 million citations, the first hundred of which appear quite legit. So I’m not buying the argument that kids lack the info to make educated choices.

What’s still lacking for many kids is good homegrown guidance. I see numerous families who not only believe their teens aren’t sexually active, but don’t even see it as a major risk factor. This is especially jaw-dropping when it comes to boys. At the risk of sounding terribly sexist, I would expect most parents of boys to be aware that their sons have at least a passing interest in sex and would therefore open regular discussion of the issue. Yet I see a lot of young men who’ve had even less of this dialogue than their female peers.

If we consider the issue at all, we seem to saddle girls with all the responsibility for birth control. Perhaps this is because there’s no “male pill.” Maybe it’s the reality that early pregnancy not only happens to teenage girls physically, but emotionally and economically. It takes two people to make a baby, but getting young men to cover their half of the obligation is a problem our society faces across every age and socioeconomic group. You only have to do a head count to realize how many more young single moms are taking care of kids than single dads.

When I take my kids to the City Museum in St. Louis, I suggest that as they climb through the many tunnels and caverns they simply assume that at any given moment they were about to raise up and smack their heads on something. I’d offer the same advice to parents of boys (and girls). Assume your kid is in a situation that calls for constant, reasonable caution, and spend some time from age 3 forward talking about how to be cautious. Few words of advice will go further to make a difference in your boy’s life.

Samantha: Wes is right. Contraception often ends up being the responsibility of the girl. We’re willing to accept HALF of that responsibility. The rest goes to the guys and, before them, their parents.

I would like to thank every parent who has talked to his/her child about protection. As a teen, I can tell you it is just as awkward for us as it is for you. We, too, would rather be sitting outside in parkas, scarves and gloves on a 105-degree day than talk with you about sex. However, your input really means something to us.

Having a “use protection” talk is hard enough in a close and open mother-daughter relationship. I can only imagine how hard it would be to broach the topic with a son. If you’re a parent who has given up on talking to your child about contraception, rethink your excuses. If you’re a teenager and you are sexually active but you aren’t using contraception, your excuses are no better. Let me see if I can bust through some common ones.

The Evolutionary Excuse: Males are programmed to want sex all the time. In the heat of the moment, they can’t possibly think about contraception. When we say guys “just can’t control themselves,” we reduce the intelligence of a male to that of an animal. That’s ridiculous. Men and women are born with brains to reason through the consequences of their actions. Teenage boys are capable of thinking to use birth control, so we can expect them to do so.

The Religious Excuse: I have a lot of respect for religious guys (and girls) who swear they will not have sex before marriage. However, pretending you are not going to have sex and then having it on the spur of the moment without a condom doesn’t make the sex any less sinful.

The Enabling Excuse: You may worry that thinking about protection makes teenagers more interested in sex. As far as I can tell, guys are thinking about sex all the time anyway. If a guy isn’t planning to have sex, great. But he should be prepared just in case.

The “What’s In It for Him?” Excuse: While a guy SHOULD care about the possibility of dismantling a girl’s life by getting her pregnant, the sad truth is that some guys don’t. While we can’t force ethics down their throats, we do have other weapons of choice. For guys who sleep around, the chance of catching an STD is a good enough reason to use contraception. For monogamous guys, the answer lies in two words: child support. With a minimum-wage job, a teenage boy will have little money left for anything else. For 18 years, even when he settles down and starts a real family, he will have that responsibility looming over him. Guys can find at least one reason to use birth control.

For parents, it’s never too late to bring up contraception. There is no right time or convenient segue way to lead you to the conversation. Just do it. For boys, step up and take responsibility. Condoms are cheaper than babies.

Next week: A mother asks what to do about a daughter who lies – even to her therapist.

Discussion

LJWorld.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

8 September 2009
at 11:27 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

smitty (Anonymous) says…

Boys…birth control….hormones……….when I was young my folks taught me what to control or else. Never asked any more questions either but early on the meaning of accountability vs responsibility took hold. Now that approach is called bad parenting.
8 September 2009
at 12:06 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

pastempah (Anonymous) says…

I have had this talk with my sons. It is indeed difficult, but as a parent you face many difficult things with your children. This is just another aspect of this.

I would much rather go out and buy my sons or daughter a box of condoms instead of them coming home with a baby. Yes, I'd rather they waited, but realistically that's not going to happen.
8 September 2009
at 12:16 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

Multidisciplinary (Anonymous) says…

►Next week: A mother asks what to do about a daughter who lies – even to her therapist.

Shucks, Having been a teen girl myself, I kind of hoped they were going to do a follow up with:

►Next week: Boys direly need lessons to be taught sex is not all about 'them”.
8 September 2009
at 12:24 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

jonas_opines (Anonymous) says…

Diz iz all Goirge BUsh' fualts.

Sorry, I just thought I'd get that one covered before anyone said it for real.

As a teenage dad (son born 1 week prior to HS graduation), I can definitely get on the bus with getting boys to take responsability too. I thought that she had it covered, and it turned out that I was wrong. It is stupid, and dangerous, to ever push responsibility for something that can effect you onto the backs of anybody other than yourself. I don't know if greater parental involvement would have helped, but it is true that the first talk we had about sex was the “baby on the way” talk, and that, well, wasn't the best way to do it.

And believe me, I've already started on my boy, as he's getting pretty close to being a teenager now.
8 September 2009
at 12:49 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

ralphralph (Anonymous) says…

You can have a baby with no job.
The gub'ment will bring it cheese.
8 September 2009
at 12:51 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

hypocritessuck (Anonymous) says…

Boys definitely need to be taught to use protection. They need to be told that if they get a girl pregnant, they will be responsible for child support for the next eighteen years. If they can't handle that, they need to use protection or not have sex.
8 September 2009
at 2:37 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…

maybe girls' parents should do more to teach their daughters. yes boys are partly responsible, but as the male of the species, our animal minds are not set up to be concerned with the consequences. after all ladies, we're just men, right? we've been told for decades that we're not as smart as women, and everything we do is wrong. so it becomes incumbent upon the woman to make sure they are protected. Whether this means choosing guys who aren't tools, or making sure that they have protection in place. teach your daughters to think, because most of the teenage boys aren't going to.

8 September 2009
at 3:44 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

denak (Anonymous) says…

Over the years, I have talked to my son about sex. It isn't always easy. I am happy I started when he was young. Talking not only about his body but the female body. Now, he is 17 1/2, and trying to talk to him about sex is like pulling teeth. But much to his dismay, I persist.

Parents have a choice, they can chose to talk to their children about sex and all its responsibilities or not. With the former, at least you have a fighting chance that they will respect, listen, adhere to your values and learn something accurate.

If you chose the latter and not talk to your children about sex, you leave it up to the media or their friends, and I think we all know how unreliable that is.

Dena
8 September 2009
at 3:55 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

bad_dog (Anonymous) says…

nice post denak.
8 September 2009
at 9:52 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

tennesseerader (Anonymous) says…

I have three sons and fear is the greatest tool.
26 September 2009
at 1:58 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

beatrice (Anonymous) says…

“The teen birth rate actually rose by 3 percent between 2005 and 2006, after dropping 34 percent over the last decade.”

The results of abstinence-only sex education during this period perhaps?
26 September 2009
at 2:02 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

Valkyrie_of_Reason (Kathy Getto) says…

Good point, bea.