Archive for Friday, October 23, 2009

Government unveils broad effort to limit executive pay

October 23, 2009


— The government zeroed in on corporate excess and recklessness Thursday with deep, unprecedented cuts in executive compensation at companies living on taxpayer money and a move to wield veto power over pay policy at thousands of banks to limit risk-taking.

The Treasury Department ordered seven big companies that haven’t repaid their government bailout money to cut their top executives’ average total compensation — salary and bonuses — in half, starting in November. Under the plan, cash salaries for the top 25 highest-paid executives will be limited in most cases to $500,000 and, in most cases, perks will be capped at $25,000.

The Federal Reserve came at the issue from another direction. It proposed to monitor pay packages at thousands of banks — even those that never received bailout money — to ensure they don’t encourage reckless gambles.

Neither plan, though, is expected to kill Wall Street’s culture of lavish pay. The Fed proposal doesn’t set specific limits on executive compensation, so it’s unclear how it would actually affect pay. And the Treasury plan covers only 175 people, with the pay limits lasting only until the companies repay what they received from the $700 billion bailout fund.

For the already struggling companies, it also introduces a new concern: brain drain. The executives targeted by “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg are among the most talented and productive at their companies.

“These people are considered the brains of the machine,” said Steven Hall, who runs an executive compensation firm bearing his name. “They are who can pull you through the tough times. This will give them reason to leave.”

The Treasury plan is limited to the seven bailed-out companies — Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial. The Fed’s proposal is much broader in scope, covering nearly 6,000 banks and a wider range of employees — from executives to traders to loan officers.

Rather than set pay levels at specific banks, the Fed would review — and could veto — pay policies. The plan is subject to a 30-day public comment period.

David Yermack, a finance professor at the Stern School of Business at New York University, called Treasury’s pay curbs a “symbolic” act.

“I think the government is trying to make examples of some banks and hoping others will follow,” Yermack said. “I think that’s naive. Wall Street bankers and traders are motivated by money, and they’re going to work for whoever pays them the most.”

He predicted the seven firms would find ways to bypass the curbs through implicit promises that aren’t written in contracts.

“They could say to someone, ‘I’ll give you a really big bonus three or four years from now. Just be patient,’” Yermack said. “There’s an understanding that if you play the game, you’ll be taken care of. That’s been going on as long as there have been businesses, and Feinberg isn’t going to be able to stop that.”

Feinberg restructured the pay packages for top executives to provide a base salary and a portion described as “stock salary.” The employees must hold the stock for two years. They can then sell only one-third of the stock payment each year for three years.

Feinberg became pay czar earlier this year as Congress was responding to outrage about huge bonuses being paid to AIG. Lawmakers amended the bailout law to require that executive compensation at companies getting exceptional assistance be curbed. Feinberg has been reviewing compensation packages since August.


JHOK32 8 years, 4 months ago

I think I speak for most Americans when I say "Thank you President Obama!" It is long overdue that these heartless pigs be held accountable for their unlimited lust for wealth. Most of these people will probably not even miss getting this year's lavish bonuses, but it does help us average Americans feel like someone is on our side for a change as we continue to fight this historic dreadful recession.

Flap Doodle 8 years, 4 months ago

The O'dude wants to control everybody & everything.

staff04 8 years, 4 months ago

At $500K/year they will still make $100K more than the highest paid employee of the federal government. I think that as long as they are on the taxpayer's teat, they shouldn't be paid any more than other federal employees.

ferrislives 8 years, 4 months ago

snap_pop_no_crackle: What is your argument in favor of those companies (as opposed to the taxpayers) who have unfortunately received a bailout from the American taxpayers? You seem to imply that they should receive whatever raises, bonuses, and crazy benefits that they want, even though we bailed them out.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.