Washington — Eight months in office, Barack Obama has now pushed closer than any other president in generations to creating a basic health care safety net for working Americans. Yet the fate of legislation delivering on his goal is far from certain: Republicans are nearly unified in opposition, Democrats hardly united in support.
Indeed, few if any of the major arguments about the scope and costs of the historic undertaking are settled as congressional leaders prepare to take legislation to the floor in the next two weeks.
Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee came together early Friday — after 2 a.m. — to finish the heavy lifting on a bill designed to appeal to moderates. Obama hailed it as a milestone and noted, for history, that overhauling health care has eluded presidents from Harry S. Truman to Richard Nixon to Bill Clinton.
“We are now closer than ever before to finally passing reform that will offer security to those who have coverage and affordable insurance to those who don’t,” Obama said.
But not yet. And not for sure.
Government plan
The 10-year, $900 billion bill would remake one-sixth of the U.S. economy, clearing a path to health insurance for millions who don’t have it now. It would be financed by reducing Medicare and Medicaid payments to health care providers, and by ordering new taxes and fees that are already meeting resistance. Insurers would no longer be able to turn away those in poor health.
Final passage in the Finance Committee, a political bellwether, is all but assured next week. After that, things really start to get interesting.
Senate Democratic leaders will begin tugging on Finance Chairman Max Baucus’ hard-won compromise to try to meld it with a liberal-leaning version passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. That second version would allow the government to sell insurance in competition with private industry, a highly controversial issue, while the plan from Baucus, D-Mont., would not.
The government-run plan doesn’t appear to have the votes to clear the Senate. In the House, it’s the other way around. A bill that doesn’t include a government plan to compete with private insurers won’t get off the floor, Democratic leaders say.
Taxes
That’s not the only fault line.
The House plan taxes the wealthy to pay for subsidies needed to make health coverage affordable for millions who are now uninsured. The Senate instead taxes the health care haves — those with expensive insurance plans.
The House plan — and the Senate health committee bill — would require employers to offer coverage to their workers or pay a tax penalty. The Senate Finance bill has no requirement that employers offer coverage, although it would levy a charge on businesses whose workers end up getting government subsidies.
If lawmakers manage to work their way through those issues, they still won’t be safely through the political minefield. They’ll face contentious issues including how to deal with coverage for abortions and how to keep benefits from going to illegal immigrants.
“A lot of people have a lot of nonstarters, and they are different nonstarters,” said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. “If you add up all the nonstarters, it makes it very difficult to pass a bill. When we get an agreement in the House, it will contain things some people will prefer weren’t in there. It will also contain things they want. As in every major piece of legislation, you have to find a balance.”
Keep it moving
Increasingly, Obama will have to step in to settle disputes and keep the bill moving forward. That will please some lawmakers and alienate others. He can’t afford to lose many of his fractious Democrats.
Polls show the public has many concerns and questions about the legislation. But for now, most Americans seem to want Congress to keep working.
Republicans are certain that the more people learn, the less they’ll like about the Democrats’ approach.
“What we know for sure about this proposal, the core of it will include half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts over 10 years and hundreds of billions of dollars in tax increases on both individuals and businesses,” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky told reporters Friday.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada has said he wants meld the Finance and health committee bills in fairly short order. He could have a bill on the floor the week after next, with debate expected to last for weeks.
Comments
igby 7 years, 9 months ago
Remember way back when you were a kid looking at the J.C Whitney, catalog and trying to decide if you were going to build a jeep or a VW bettle dune buggy or and old truck with all the hot rod hood scoops. But first you had to get a job after school. Then you figured out that all the jobs that you could get didn't pay squat. You could only work part time and after a few pay checks, you had enough only to buy a fishing rod and reel and a pup tent, an army canteen and a camping lantern. Then the summer went into fall and another issue of J.C. Whitney came in the mail and it reminded you of your failures and the lost dream of building that whatever that never did happen. Well, it never did happen. J.C. Whitney and the rich Soap Box derby kids with their rich parents with sail boats and 8mm movie cameras were from a different world. That never did change my way of thinking about reality and how the world really is and will be. Playing with nails and a hammer and building stuff from scraps and junk were my toys and after a while I realized that they weren't any fun anymore and moving on to other things. Reality being the same there as well, I learned not to set my hopes to high because my means were in touch more so with reality rather than hopes and dreams.
igby 7 years, 9 months ago
Remember way back when you were a kid looking at the Sears and Robuck catalog and trying to decide if you were going to ....get a tingle.......
You know the rest of the story.......
Forget it Obama!
...or was it J.C. Penny, I can't remember!
Richard Heckler 7 years, 9 months ago
If one would remove: elected officials as shareholders special interest campaign funding the insurance industry recklessly spending health care dollars to bribe votes the news media offering misinformation ( their large advertising revenue is at stake)
The nations consumers could have excellent medicare insurance for all.
Remember it is the most expensive medical insurance in the world that denies care and/or cancels coverage after taking ones money for years and years. Medicare Insurance for All would not all such arrogance.
Richard Heckler 7 years, 9 months ago
A family of four making the median income of $56,200 would pay about $2,700 in payroll tax for all health care costs.
HR 676 ends deductibles and co-payments. HR 676 would save hundreds of billions annually by eliminating the high overhead and profits of the private health insurance industry and HMOs.
Medicare Insurance for ALL (HR 676) http://www.healthcare-now.org/
Doctors for Single Payer(HR 676) http://www.pnhp.org/
Unions for HR 676 http://unionsforsinglepayerhr676.org/union_endorsers
Organizations and Government Bodies Endorsing HR 676 http://www.pnhp.org/action/organizations_and_government_bodies_endorsing_hr_676.php
Health Care In the USA http://www.dollarsandsense.org/healthcare.html
Consumer Reports On Health Care http://blogs.consumerreports.org/health/health_reform/
National Health Insurance does not remove competition from the actual health care industry. It will be alive and well. Profits will be based on customer service and clinic performance based on the clients experience. This is my perception of competition.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.