Advertisement

Archive for Friday, November 27, 2009

Car insurance scofflaws raise doubts for health mandate

November 27, 2009

Advertisement

— Thousands of drivers on the nation’s roads don’t carry auto insurance, despite laws in all but two states requiring it. Critics of President Barack Obama’s health overhaul plan ask: What are the chances scofflaws will treat a requirement to carry health insurance any differently?

Nearly 40 years of car insurance mandates — which the insurance industry says have failed to make roads safer or lower auto insurance costs — raise questions about how well such mandates work.

“Not everyone complies,” said Scott Harrington, a professor of health care management and risk management at the University of Pennsylvania. “The auto insurance mandate is almost everywhere. But it’s not rigorously enforceable.”

David Sampson, president and CEO of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, said drivers’ personal financial situations, not the rules of their states, are a better indicator of whether they carry insurance.

States with higher poverty rates show a corresponding rise in uninsured drivers, he said. Simply put, people skirt car insurance when they can’t afford it.

They may do the same with health insurance, so the trick for Congress will be how to enforce a mandate without scuttling the program.

Set fines too low and healthy folks may decide to simply pay them and not buy insurance. But if fines are too high, voters may reject the plan or worry they could end up in jail for not getting coverage.

The House version would fine people up to 2.5 percent of adjustable income by 2017, while a Senate version would fine adults up to $750 a year.

Requiring everyone to buy health insurance can help spread the responsibility for medical costs. With proposed subsidies to help the poor buy into it, the so-called “individual mandate” gets Democrats closer to moving millions of uninsured into coverage plans.

Obama did not support an individual mandate in his campaign, but now says his thinking has evolved.

“We’re not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you any more than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance,” Obama said in September on ABC’s “This Week” show.

Auto insurance mandates started cropping up in states in the 1970s, becoming virtually standard by the 1990s.

Comments

Richard Heckler 4 years, 4 months ago

This deal of criminalizing NOT having insurance is laughable.

What about this criminal like activity?

*elected officials as shareholders yet voting = conflicts of interest

*special interest campaign funding = illegal use of health care dollars

*the insurance industry recklessly spending health care dollars to bribe votes = crime

*industry over charging consumers = crime

*Is protecting the most expensive medical insurance in the world good for business?

*Is protecting the most expensive medical insurance in the world good for keeping the cost of of just about everything we buy in reasonable check?

*Did we elect people to office to protect the most expensive medical insurance in the world from a more reasonable and fiscally responsible insurance program? No way jose' That is corrupt.

*Did we send elected officials to Washington to accept special interest campaign money from the most expensive medical insurance program in the world?

0

Richard Heckler 4 years, 4 months ago

It is not necessarily Pelosi's bill at all. Part of it belongs to the Blue Dog Democrats and likely some to Sen Snowe of Maine a republican(probably one of two remaining republicans in the republican party).

0

jmadison 4 years, 4 months ago

Doesn't Pelosi's bill criminalize the act of not buying health insurance?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.