Advertisement

Archive for Saturday, May 30, 2009

Calipari is Kentucky’s problem now

May 30, 2009

Advertisement

An open letter to University of Kentucky President Lee T. Todd Jr.:

Re: The recent hiring by UK of a head men’s basketball coach whose former program now stands alleged of major NCAA violations.

Well that didn’t take long, did it Dr. Todd?

Exactly 56 days after you introduced John Calipari as Kentucky coach on April Fool’s Day, it became public that the NCAA is charging Cal’s former school, Memphis, with major violations including academic fraud.

Now you, Dr. Todd, as president of one of the most penalized schools in NCAA history, have hired a coach who may soon have Final Four trips from two different schools “vacated” due to rules infractions on his watch.

That would be a proud entry on the legacy of a university president, wouldn’t it?

It’s painful to watch a president I’ve always thought of as well-meaning and honest and who came into office preaching “reform” of a scandal-plagued UK athletics department now reduced to shamelessly operating in spin mode.

When the allegations against Memphis broke early Wednesday evening, Kentucky found itself with two public-relations options.

Essentially, Dr. Todd, you and Mitch Barnhart either had to admit you blew yet another background check on a major coaching hire (see Gillispie, Billy Clyde) or say that you knew about allegations that included academic fraud but did not consider that a deal breaker.

In a terse four-paragraph statement issued at 11:47 p.m. Wednesday, UK chose the latter course.

For a university president, Dr. Todd, that can’t be comfortable ground upon which to stand.

Kentucky and its spinners are hanging their “defense” of their new head coach on the fact that Calipari is not personally named by the NCAA in the allegations that apparently involve his signature player at Memphis, Derrick Rose.

Of course, Calipari was not “named” when his signature player at Massachusetts, Marcus Camby, was found to be on the payroll of an agent during his college playing days under Cal.

Alleged scandals like the one in Memphis tend to produce a “drip, drip, drip” of new accusations. You think there aren’t some Memphis backers, feeling jilted by Calipari’s departure, who may not have their tongues loosened?

Furthermore, Dr. Todd, you better hope that Calipari’s recruitment of mega-prospects John Wall and DeMarcus Cousins — which began on Memphis’ recruiting budget and ended with signatures on Kentucky letters of intent — was on the up-and-up.

Every media outlet with an investigative capacity has incentive now to take a fresh look at how Calipari’s program was operating.

So does the NCAA.

For 55 days, Dr. Todd, you basked in the positives that came from hiring John Calipari. The coach’s public-relations magic, his boundless energy, his big-picture vision for what Kentucky basketball can be.

On the 56th day, you found out exactly what the other side of being associated with Calipari is like.

You better get ready, Dr. Todd. Your sleepless nights have just begun.

Comments

sjposton 5 years, 6 months ago

Let's say for the sake of argument Calipari is dirt (however you define it). This conclusion about this guy is based primarily on two concrete events (one before this week) and a boat load of innuendo.

The first event, Camby taking money from an agent. How does that benefit Calipari? It doesn't. But he should have known! Really? How? No one would have known if Camby had not backed out of the deal with the crooked agent. My guess is (and I admit to hopeless cynicism) that this is not an unusual arrangement in many high profile program including the Dukes, the North Carolinas, the Kentuckys and the Kansi (Kansases?). The only unusual thing is that it has come out.

The second, and most recent incident, Rose possibly having someone else take his SAT so he could qualify to play D1. This one does benefit Calipari very directly. But, this likely happened before the kid ever set foot on campus. He should have know or been suspicious!! Why, every major school has kids who barely qualify. Do they go back and look at the SAT security photos on all of them (maybe they should).

Kansas, North Caralina and Duke all showed interest in John Wall who was a borderline qualifier. Were they going to have someone follow him around and spy on him until he took his SATs? How would they know if he had cheated. And the biggest question of all, would they even care as long as he didn't get caugh?

How would Self, Williams and Coach Mike at Duke police these two situations? If you turned over every little rock at every school you will find that these are not isolated incidents.

If both (not just one) of these situations happened at Duke, the players would get hammered and the coach would get a pass. Everyone would believe that he had no idea (even I would believe it). But somehow Calipari doesn't get that benefit of the doubt.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.