Advertisement

Archive for Thursday, July 9, 2009

U.S., other wealthy nations vow global warming cuts

July 9, 2009

Advertisement

— Targeting global warming, President Barack Obama and other leaders of the world’s richest industrial countries pledged Wednesday to seek dramatic cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 to slow dangerous climate change. Setting a marker for success, they agreed for the first time that worldwide temperatures must not rise more than a few degrees.

However, their goals are nonbinding, and it’s far from clear they will be met. The wealthy nations failed to persuade the leaders of big developing countries to promise to cut their own fast-spreading pollution, unable to overcome arguments that the well-established industrial giants aren’t doing enough in the short term.

Obama and his counterparts from the other wealthy Group of Eight nations agreed that global temperatures should be kept from rising by more than 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, in the fight against weather changes caused by mankind.

The results left some Western leaders cheering. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called the group’s statement a “historic agreement.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said it was “a clear step forward.”

Environmental groups said the effort fell far short in its bid to cut carbon emissions that come mainly from energy production and that trap heat in the atmosphere. Still, climate change experts said the measure on trying to limit temperature increases — with agreement by both the G-8 and a 17-member group of industrialized and developing nations meeting here this week — was an important step.

An increase up to the limit the leaders set wouldn’t eliminate the risk of runaway climate change but would reduce it, experts said. Even a slight increase in average temperatures could wreak havoc on farmers around the globe, as seasons shift, crops fail and storms and droughts ravage fields.

“After a long struggle, all of the G-8 nations have finally accepted the 2-degree goal,” said Merkel.

The United States and other G-8 nations set a goal of reducing their greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent or more by 2050. That’s part of a plan to have all such gases, from rich and poor nations alike, fall by 50 percent globally by that year.

But developing countries feel the better-established nations aren’t doing enough in the shorter term. They also worry that major reduction commitments on their parts, even if below the 80 percent target of rich nations, would hamper economic growth in China, India, Mexico, Brazil and many other non-G-8 countries.

As for the target for limiting global temperatures, a summit statement said it reflected a “broad scientific view.”

Until now, however, the U.S. had resisted embracing the target because it implied a commitment to dramatically change the way the world generates electricity, fuels its cars and builds its houses. U.S. businesses and the broader national economy could suffer badly under strict pollution limits, many argue.

Environmentalists welcomed the shift in U.S. policy but criticized the G-8’s failure to agree on more immediate goals for the industrial countries. The long-term ambition “is too far off to matter — poor people are being hit today,” said Antonio Hill, of the nonprofit Oxfam International.

The G-8 leaders also addressed the global recession and agreed economic conditions are still too shaky to begin rolling back massive fiscal stimulus plans.

A statement said leaders “note some signs of stabilization,” but it stressed the difficult outlook instead of counter-concerns over debt and high spending.

The leaders did commit to preparing exit strategies from the “unprecedented and concerted action” that has been taken to boost growth through government spending, low interest rates and expansive monetary policy. Germany, worried about running up crippling debt, has pressed for spending restraint, but other major economies including Britain, Japan and the United States won’t rule out the need to pump in more money.

The leaders gathered Wednesday in the earthquake-devastated central Italian city of L’Aquila, many arriving in electric cars and all welcomed by Italian host Premier Silvio Berlusconi. Over a long working dinner, they discussed world security issues ranging from Iran to North Korea.

Comments

Chris Golledge 5 years, 2 months ago

What, no conspiracy theories involving the miraculous secrecy of tens of thousands, no offhanded disregard for thousands of person-years of research? Where are all the usual posters on this topic?

0

JSDAD 5 years, 2 months ago

Less working = less warming it allready works

0

Flap Doodle 5 years, 2 months ago

Without China & India onboard, it's all just whizzing in the wind.

0

Chris Golledge 5 years, 2 months ago

Yes Nancy, compared to most of the world's population, you and everyone else reading this are very rich.

Snap, whatever. What are you saying? If you can't get the whole enchilada, you don't want anything?

China is producing marginally more CO2 than the US, yet have six times the population. So, roughly on average, US citizens produce 6 times as much CO2 as Chinese citizens. The wealth we enjoy is a product of our energy/fossil fuel consumption; so, is it a surprise that the Chinese and Indians have some different ideas about what is equitable and fair in terms of cutbacks?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.