Europeans detail drawbacks of state-run health care / LJWorld.com

Archive for Sunday, July 5, 2009

Associated Press

July 5, 2009

London — As President Barack Obama pushes to overhaul the American health care system, the role of government is at the heart of the debate. In Europe, free, state-run health care is a given.

But the system is far from perfect. In Britain, France, Switzerland and elsewhere, public health costs have skyrocketed and in some cases, patients have needlessly suffered and died.

Obama has said he does not want to bring European-style health care to the U.S. and that he intends to introduce a government-run plan to compete with private insurance, not replace it. Private health care is also available in Europe, creating in some instances a two-tier system that critics say defeats the egalitarian impulse on which national systems were built.

Critics of Britain’s National Health System say the policies are often driven more by politics than science. More serious problems in Britain’s health care were reported last month, when cancer researchers announced that as many as 15,000 people over age 75 were dying prematurely from cancer every year.

The U.S. already spends the most worldwide on health care. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the U.S. spent $7,290 per person in 2007, while Britain spent $2,992 and France spent $3,601.

Still, experts say that before committing the U.S. to footing the bill for universal health care, Obama should consider it has cost Europe. A World Health Organization survey in 2000 found that France had the world’s best health system. But its health budgets have been in the red since 1988.

Discussion

LJWorld.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

5 July 2009
at 9:25 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…

“The U.S. already spends the most worldwide on health care. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the U.S. spent $7,290 per person in 2007, while Britain spent $2,992 and France spent $3,601.”

If we want to continue to spend double what everybody else does, under a single-payer system, we could still cover everyone without any of the problems experienced in Europe that are mentioned in this article.
5 July 2009
at 11:09 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

pace (Anonymous) says…

odd no name but AP on this. Seems like an opinion piece and no name.
5 July 2009
at 12:51 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

SettingTheRecordStraight (Anonymous) says…

What's the operative word in all of bozo's musings about government-controlled health care? “We.” You'll hear advocates of bigger, more intrusive government use the term “we” constantly. As if your family is responsible for my family. As if your income is my income. As if your effort is not for your benefit but, instead, for the benefit of the commune or the collective.

It's frightening to think about what else bozo and his power-hungry elitist buddies have in store for you and me.
5 July 2009
at 1:10 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

barrypenders (Anonymous) says…

This can't be true! Europe is a progressive place. Obama and Europe know what's best for mankind. I bet some fired insurance dweeb is behind this or Palin is.